Cargando…

Scanning Accuracy of Bracket Features and Slot Base Angle in Different Bracket Materials by Four Intraoral Scanners: An In Vitro Study

The accurate expression of bracket prescription is important for successful orthodontic treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of digital scan images of brackets produced by four intraoral scanners (IOSs) when scanning the surface of the dental model attached with different br...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shin, Seon-Hee, Yu, Hyung-Seog, Cha, Jung-Yul, Kwon, Jae-Sung, Hwang, Chung-Ju
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7828544/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33451075
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14020365
_version_ 1783641034766417920
author Shin, Seon-Hee
Yu, Hyung-Seog
Cha, Jung-Yul
Kwon, Jae-Sung
Hwang, Chung-Ju
author_facet Shin, Seon-Hee
Yu, Hyung-Seog
Cha, Jung-Yul
Kwon, Jae-Sung
Hwang, Chung-Ju
author_sort Shin, Seon-Hee
collection PubMed
description The accurate expression of bracket prescription is important for successful orthodontic treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of digital scan images of brackets produced by four intraoral scanners (IOSs) when scanning the surface of the dental model attached with different bracket materials. Brackets made from stainless steel, polycrystalline alumina, composite, and composite/stainless steel slot were considered, which have been scanned from four different IOSs (Primescan, Trios, CS3600, and i500). SEM images were used as references. Each bracket axis was set in the reference scan image, and the axis was set identically by superimposing with the IOS image, and then only the brackets were divided and analyzed. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare the differences. The difference between the manufacturer’s nominal torque and bracket slot base angle was 0.39 in SEM, 1.96 in Primescan, 2.04 in Trios, and 5.21 in CS3600 (p < 0.001). The parallelism, which is the difference between the upper and lower angles of the slot wall, was 0.48 in SEM, 7.00 in Primescan, 5.52 in Trios, 6.34 in CS3600, and 23.74 in i500 (p < 0.001). This study evaluated the accuracy of the bracket only, and it must be admitted that there is some error in recognizing slots through scanning in general.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7828544
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78285442021-01-25 Scanning Accuracy of Bracket Features and Slot Base Angle in Different Bracket Materials by Four Intraoral Scanners: An In Vitro Study Shin, Seon-Hee Yu, Hyung-Seog Cha, Jung-Yul Kwon, Jae-Sung Hwang, Chung-Ju Materials (Basel) Article The accurate expression of bracket prescription is important for successful orthodontic treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of digital scan images of brackets produced by four intraoral scanners (IOSs) when scanning the surface of the dental model attached with different bracket materials. Brackets made from stainless steel, polycrystalline alumina, composite, and composite/stainless steel slot were considered, which have been scanned from four different IOSs (Primescan, Trios, CS3600, and i500). SEM images were used as references. Each bracket axis was set in the reference scan image, and the axis was set identically by superimposing with the IOS image, and then only the brackets were divided and analyzed. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare the differences. The difference between the manufacturer’s nominal torque and bracket slot base angle was 0.39 in SEM, 1.96 in Primescan, 2.04 in Trios, and 5.21 in CS3600 (p < 0.001). The parallelism, which is the difference between the upper and lower angles of the slot wall, was 0.48 in SEM, 7.00 in Primescan, 5.52 in Trios, 6.34 in CS3600, and 23.74 in i500 (p < 0.001). This study evaluated the accuracy of the bracket only, and it must be admitted that there is some error in recognizing slots through scanning in general. MDPI 2021-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7828544/ /pubmed/33451075 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14020365 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Shin, Seon-Hee
Yu, Hyung-Seog
Cha, Jung-Yul
Kwon, Jae-Sung
Hwang, Chung-Ju
Scanning Accuracy of Bracket Features and Slot Base Angle in Different Bracket Materials by Four Intraoral Scanners: An In Vitro Study
title Scanning Accuracy of Bracket Features and Slot Base Angle in Different Bracket Materials by Four Intraoral Scanners: An In Vitro Study
title_full Scanning Accuracy of Bracket Features and Slot Base Angle in Different Bracket Materials by Four Intraoral Scanners: An In Vitro Study
title_fullStr Scanning Accuracy of Bracket Features and Slot Base Angle in Different Bracket Materials by Four Intraoral Scanners: An In Vitro Study
title_full_unstemmed Scanning Accuracy of Bracket Features and Slot Base Angle in Different Bracket Materials by Four Intraoral Scanners: An In Vitro Study
title_short Scanning Accuracy of Bracket Features and Slot Base Angle in Different Bracket Materials by Four Intraoral Scanners: An In Vitro Study
title_sort scanning accuracy of bracket features and slot base angle in different bracket materials by four intraoral scanners: an in vitro study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7828544/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33451075
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14020365
work_keys_str_mv AT shinseonhee scanningaccuracyofbracketfeaturesandslotbaseangleindifferentbracketmaterialsbyfourintraoralscannersaninvitrostudy
AT yuhyungseog scanningaccuracyofbracketfeaturesandslotbaseangleindifferentbracketmaterialsbyfourintraoralscannersaninvitrostudy
AT chajungyul scanningaccuracyofbracketfeaturesandslotbaseangleindifferentbracketmaterialsbyfourintraoralscannersaninvitrostudy
AT kwonjaesung scanningaccuracyofbracketfeaturesandslotbaseangleindifferentbracketmaterialsbyfourintraoralscannersaninvitrostudy
AT hwangchungju scanningaccuracyofbracketfeaturesandslotbaseangleindifferentbracketmaterialsbyfourintraoralscannersaninvitrostudy