Cargando…
Scanning Accuracy of Bracket Features and Slot Base Angle in Different Bracket Materials by Four Intraoral Scanners: An In Vitro Study
The accurate expression of bracket prescription is important for successful orthodontic treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of digital scan images of brackets produced by four intraoral scanners (IOSs) when scanning the surface of the dental model attached with different br...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7828544/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33451075 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14020365 |
_version_ | 1783641034766417920 |
---|---|
author | Shin, Seon-Hee Yu, Hyung-Seog Cha, Jung-Yul Kwon, Jae-Sung Hwang, Chung-Ju |
author_facet | Shin, Seon-Hee Yu, Hyung-Seog Cha, Jung-Yul Kwon, Jae-Sung Hwang, Chung-Ju |
author_sort | Shin, Seon-Hee |
collection | PubMed |
description | The accurate expression of bracket prescription is important for successful orthodontic treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of digital scan images of brackets produced by four intraoral scanners (IOSs) when scanning the surface of the dental model attached with different bracket materials. Brackets made from stainless steel, polycrystalline alumina, composite, and composite/stainless steel slot were considered, which have been scanned from four different IOSs (Primescan, Trios, CS3600, and i500). SEM images were used as references. Each bracket axis was set in the reference scan image, and the axis was set identically by superimposing with the IOS image, and then only the brackets were divided and analyzed. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare the differences. The difference between the manufacturer’s nominal torque and bracket slot base angle was 0.39 in SEM, 1.96 in Primescan, 2.04 in Trios, and 5.21 in CS3600 (p < 0.001). The parallelism, which is the difference between the upper and lower angles of the slot wall, was 0.48 in SEM, 7.00 in Primescan, 5.52 in Trios, 6.34 in CS3600, and 23.74 in i500 (p < 0.001). This study evaluated the accuracy of the bracket only, and it must be admitted that there is some error in recognizing slots through scanning in general. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7828544 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78285442021-01-25 Scanning Accuracy of Bracket Features and Slot Base Angle in Different Bracket Materials by Four Intraoral Scanners: An In Vitro Study Shin, Seon-Hee Yu, Hyung-Seog Cha, Jung-Yul Kwon, Jae-Sung Hwang, Chung-Ju Materials (Basel) Article The accurate expression of bracket prescription is important for successful orthodontic treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of digital scan images of brackets produced by four intraoral scanners (IOSs) when scanning the surface of the dental model attached with different bracket materials. Brackets made from stainless steel, polycrystalline alumina, composite, and composite/stainless steel slot were considered, which have been scanned from four different IOSs (Primescan, Trios, CS3600, and i500). SEM images were used as references. Each bracket axis was set in the reference scan image, and the axis was set identically by superimposing with the IOS image, and then only the brackets were divided and analyzed. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare the differences. The difference between the manufacturer’s nominal torque and bracket slot base angle was 0.39 in SEM, 1.96 in Primescan, 2.04 in Trios, and 5.21 in CS3600 (p < 0.001). The parallelism, which is the difference between the upper and lower angles of the slot wall, was 0.48 in SEM, 7.00 in Primescan, 5.52 in Trios, 6.34 in CS3600, and 23.74 in i500 (p < 0.001). This study evaluated the accuracy of the bracket only, and it must be admitted that there is some error in recognizing slots through scanning in general. MDPI 2021-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7828544/ /pubmed/33451075 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14020365 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Shin, Seon-Hee Yu, Hyung-Seog Cha, Jung-Yul Kwon, Jae-Sung Hwang, Chung-Ju Scanning Accuracy of Bracket Features and Slot Base Angle in Different Bracket Materials by Four Intraoral Scanners: An In Vitro Study |
title | Scanning Accuracy of Bracket Features and Slot Base Angle in Different Bracket Materials by Four Intraoral Scanners: An In Vitro Study |
title_full | Scanning Accuracy of Bracket Features and Slot Base Angle in Different Bracket Materials by Four Intraoral Scanners: An In Vitro Study |
title_fullStr | Scanning Accuracy of Bracket Features and Slot Base Angle in Different Bracket Materials by Four Intraoral Scanners: An In Vitro Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Scanning Accuracy of Bracket Features and Slot Base Angle in Different Bracket Materials by Four Intraoral Scanners: An In Vitro Study |
title_short | Scanning Accuracy of Bracket Features and Slot Base Angle in Different Bracket Materials by Four Intraoral Scanners: An In Vitro Study |
title_sort | scanning accuracy of bracket features and slot base angle in different bracket materials by four intraoral scanners: an in vitro study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7828544/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33451075 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14020365 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shinseonhee scanningaccuracyofbracketfeaturesandslotbaseangleindifferentbracketmaterialsbyfourintraoralscannersaninvitrostudy AT yuhyungseog scanningaccuracyofbracketfeaturesandslotbaseangleindifferentbracketmaterialsbyfourintraoralscannersaninvitrostudy AT chajungyul scanningaccuracyofbracketfeaturesandslotbaseangleindifferentbracketmaterialsbyfourintraoralscannersaninvitrostudy AT kwonjaesung scanningaccuracyofbracketfeaturesandslotbaseangleindifferentbracketmaterialsbyfourintraoralscannersaninvitrostudy AT hwangchungju scanningaccuracyofbracketfeaturesandslotbaseangleindifferentbracketmaterialsbyfourintraoralscannersaninvitrostudy |