Cargando…
Adoption of single fraction radiotherapy for uncomplicated bone metastases in a tertiary centre
BACKGROUND: Single-fraction radiotherapy (SFRT) offers equal pain relief for uncomplicated painful bone metastases as compared to multiple-fraction radiotherapy (MFRT). Despite this evidence, the adoption of SFRT has been poor with published rates of SFRT for uncomplicated bone metastases ranging fr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7829104/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33532632 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2021.01.004 |
_version_ | 1783641118466899968 |
---|---|
author | Peters, Cedric Vandewiele, Julie Lievens, Yolande van Eijkeren, Marc Fonteyne, Valérie Boterberg, Tom Deseyne, Pieter Veldeman, Liv De Neve, Wilfried Monten, Chris Braems, Sabine Duprez, Fréderic Vandecasteele, Katrien Ost, Piet |
author_facet | Peters, Cedric Vandewiele, Julie Lievens, Yolande van Eijkeren, Marc Fonteyne, Valérie Boterberg, Tom Deseyne, Pieter Veldeman, Liv De Neve, Wilfried Monten, Chris Braems, Sabine Duprez, Fréderic Vandecasteele, Katrien Ost, Piet |
author_sort | Peters, Cedric |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Single-fraction radiotherapy (SFRT) offers equal pain relief for uncomplicated painful bone metastases as compared to multiple-fraction radiotherapy (MFRT). Despite this evidence, the adoption of SFRT has been poor with published rates of SFRT for uncomplicated bone metastases ranging from <10% to 70%. We aimed to evaluate the adoption of SFRT and its evolution over time following the more formal endorsement of the international guidelines in our centre starting from 2013. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of fractionation schedules at our centre for painful uncomplicated bone metastases from January 2013 until December 2017. Only patients treated with 1 × 8 Gy (SFRT-group) or 10 × 3 Gy (MFRT-group) were included. We excluded other fractionation schedules, primary cancer of the bone and post-operative radiotherapy. Uncomplicated was defined as painful but not associated with impending fracture, existing fracture or existing neurological compression. Temporal trends in SFRT/MFRT usage and overall survival were investigated. We performed a lesion-based patterns of care analysis and a patient-based survival analysis. Mann-Whitney U and Chi-square test were used to assess differences between fractionation schedules and temporal trends in prescription, with Kaplan-Meier estimates used for survival analysis (p-value <0.05 considered significant). RESULTS: Overall, 352 patients and 594 uncomplicated bone metastases met inclusion criteria. Patient characteristics were comparable between SFRT and MFRT, except for age. Overall, SFRT was used in 92% of all metastases compared to 8% for MFRT. SFRT rates increased throughout the study period from 85% in 2013 to 95% in 2017 (p = 0.06). Re-irradiation rates were higher in patients treated with SFRT (14%) as compared to MFRT (4%) (p = 0.046). Four-week mortality and median overall survival did not differ significantly between SFRT and MFRT (17% vs 18%, p = 0.8 and 25 weeks vs 38 weeks, p = 0.97, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to the international guidelines for SFRT for uncomplicated bone metastasis was high and increased over time to 95%, which is the highest reported rate in literature. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7829104 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78291042021-02-01 Adoption of single fraction radiotherapy for uncomplicated bone metastases in a tertiary centre Peters, Cedric Vandewiele, Julie Lievens, Yolande van Eijkeren, Marc Fonteyne, Valérie Boterberg, Tom Deseyne, Pieter Veldeman, Liv De Neve, Wilfried Monten, Chris Braems, Sabine Duprez, Fréderic Vandecasteele, Katrien Ost, Piet Clin Transl Radiat Oncol Original Research Article BACKGROUND: Single-fraction radiotherapy (SFRT) offers equal pain relief for uncomplicated painful bone metastases as compared to multiple-fraction radiotherapy (MFRT). Despite this evidence, the adoption of SFRT has been poor with published rates of SFRT for uncomplicated bone metastases ranging from <10% to 70%. We aimed to evaluate the adoption of SFRT and its evolution over time following the more formal endorsement of the international guidelines in our centre starting from 2013. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of fractionation schedules at our centre for painful uncomplicated bone metastases from January 2013 until December 2017. Only patients treated with 1 × 8 Gy (SFRT-group) or 10 × 3 Gy (MFRT-group) were included. We excluded other fractionation schedules, primary cancer of the bone and post-operative radiotherapy. Uncomplicated was defined as painful but not associated with impending fracture, existing fracture or existing neurological compression. Temporal trends in SFRT/MFRT usage and overall survival were investigated. We performed a lesion-based patterns of care analysis and a patient-based survival analysis. Mann-Whitney U and Chi-square test were used to assess differences between fractionation schedules and temporal trends in prescription, with Kaplan-Meier estimates used for survival analysis (p-value <0.05 considered significant). RESULTS: Overall, 352 patients and 594 uncomplicated bone metastases met inclusion criteria. Patient characteristics were comparable between SFRT and MFRT, except for age. Overall, SFRT was used in 92% of all metastases compared to 8% for MFRT. SFRT rates increased throughout the study period from 85% in 2013 to 95% in 2017 (p = 0.06). Re-irradiation rates were higher in patients treated with SFRT (14%) as compared to MFRT (4%) (p = 0.046). Four-week mortality and median overall survival did not differ significantly between SFRT and MFRT (17% vs 18%, p = 0.8 and 25 weeks vs 38 weeks, p = 0.97, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to the international guidelines for SFRT for uncomplicated bone metastasis was high and increased over time to 95%, which is the highest reported rate in literature. Elsevier 2021-01-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7829104/ /pubmed/33532632 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2021.01.004 Text en © 2021 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Peters, Cedric Vandewiele, Julie Lievens, Yolande van Eijkeren, Marc Fonteyne, Valérie Boterberg, Tom Deseyne, Pieter Veldeman, Liv De Neve, Wilfried Monten, Chris Braems, Sabine Duprez, Fréderic Vandecasteele, Katrien Ost, Piet Adoption of single fraction radiotherapy for uncomplicated bone metastases in a tertiary centre |
title | Adoption of single fraction radiotherapy for uncomplicated bone metastases in a tertiary centre |
title_full | Adoption of single fraction radiotherapy for uncomplicated bone metastases in a tertiary centre |
title_fullStr | Adoption of single fraction radiotherapy for uncomplicated bone metastases in a tertiary centre |
title_full_unstemmed | Adoption of single fraction radiotherapy for uncomplicated bone metastases in a tertiary centre |
title_short | Adoption of single fraction radiotherapy for uncomplicated bone metastases in a tertiary centre |
title_sort | adoption of single fraction radiotherapy for uncomplicated bone metastases in a tertiary centre |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7829104/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33532632 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2021.01.004 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT peterscedric adoptionofsinglefractionradiotherapyforuncomplicatedbonemetastasesinatertiarycentre AT vandewielejulie adoptionofsinglefractionradiotherapyforuncomplicatedbonemetastasesinatertiarycentre AT lievensyolande adoptionofsinglefractionradiotherapyforuncomplicatedbonemetastasesinatertiarycentre AT vaneijkerenmarc adoptionofsinglefractionradiotherapyforuncomplicatedbonemetastasesinatertiarycentre AT fonteynevalerie adoptionofsinglefractionradiotherapyforuncomplicatedbonemetastasesinatertiarycentre AT boterbergtom adoptionofsinglefractionradiotherapyforuncomplicatedbonemetastasesinatertiarycentre AT deseynepieter adoptionofsinglefractionradiotherapyforuncomplicatedbonemetastasesinatertiarycentre AT veldemanliv adoptionofsinglefractionradiotherapyforuncomplicatedbonemetastasesinatertiarycentre AT denevewilfried adoptionofsinglefractionradiotherapyforuncomplicatedbonemetastasesinatertiarycentre AT montenchris adoptionofsinglefractionradiotherapyforuncomplicatedbonemetastasesinatertiarycentre AT braemssabine adoptionofsinglefractionradiotherapyforuncomplicatedbonemetastasesinatertiarycentre AT duprezfrederic adoptionofsinglefractionradiotherapyforuncomplicatedbonemetastasesinatertiarycentre AT vandecasteelekatrien adoptionofsinglefractionradiotherapyforuncomplicatedbonemetastasesinatertiarycentre AT ostpiet adoptionofsinglefractionradiotherapyforuncomplicatedbonemetastasesinatertiarycentre |