Cargando…

Adoption of single fraction radiotherapy for uncomplicated bone metastases in a tertiary centre

BACKGROUND: Single-fraction radiotherapy (SFRT) offers equal pain relief for uncomplicated painful bone metastases as compared to multiple-fraction radiotherapy (MFRT). Despite this evidence, the adoption of SFRT has been poor with published rates of SFRT for uncomplicated bone metastases ranging fr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peters, Cedric, Vandewiele, Julie, Lievens, Yolande, van Eijkeren, Marc, Fonteyne, Valérie, Boterberg, Tom, Deseyne, Pieter, Veldeman, Liv, De Neve, Wilfried, Monten, Chris, Braems, Sabine, Duprez, Fréderic, Vandecasteele, Katrien, Ost, Piet
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7829104/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33532632
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2021.01.004
_version_ 1783641118466899968
author Peters, Cedric
Vandewiele, Julie
Lievens, Yolande
van Eijkeren, Marc
Fonteyne, Valérie
Boterberg, Tom
Deseyne, Pieter
Veldeman, Liv
De Neve, Wilfried
Monten, Chris
Braems, Sabine
Duprez, Fréderic
Vandecasteele, Katrien
Ost, Piet
author_facet Peters, Cedric
Vandewiele, Julie
Lievens, Yolande
van Eijkeren, Marc
Fonteyne, Valérie
Boterberg, Tom
Deseyne, Pieter
Veldeman, Liv
De Neve, Wilfried
Monten, Chris
Braems, Sabine
Duprez, Fréderic
Vandecasteele, Katrien
Ost, Piet
author_sort Peters, Cedric
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Single-fraction radiotherapy (SFRT) offers equal pain relief for uncomplicated painful bone metastases as compared to multiple-fraction radiotherapy (MFRT). Despite this evidence, the adoption of SFRT has been poor with published rates of SFRT for uncomplicated bone metastases ranging from <10% to 70%. We aimed to evaluate the adoption of SFRT and its evolution over time following the more formal endorsement of the international guidelines in our centre starting from 2013. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of fractionation schedules at our centre for painful uncomplicated bone metastases from January 2013 until December 2017. Only patients treated with 1 × 8 Gy (SFRT-group) or 10 × 3 Gy (MFRT-group) were included. We excluded other fractionation schedules, primary cancer of the bone and post-operative radiotherapy. Uncomplicated was defined as painful but not associated with impending fracture, existing fracture or existing neurological compression. Temporal trends in SFRT/MFRT usage and overall survival were investigated. We performed a lesion-based patterns of care analysis and a patient-based survival analysis. Mann-Whitney U and Chi-square test were used to assess differences between fractionation schedules and temporal trends in prescription, with Kaplan-Meier estimates used for survival analysis (p-value <0.05 considered significant). RESULTS: Overall, 352 patients and 594 uncomplicated bone metastases met inclusion criteria. Patient characteristics were comparable between SFRT and MFRT, except for age. Overall, SFRT was used in 92% of all metastases compared to 8% for MFRT. SFRT rates increased throughout the study period from 85% in 2013 to 95% in 2017 (p = 0.06). Re-irradiation rates were higher in patients treated with SFRT (14%) as compared to MFRT (4%) (p = 0.046). Four-week mortality and median overall survival did not differ significantly between SFRT and MFRT (17% vs 18%, p = 0.8 and 25 weeks vs 38 weeks, p = 0.97, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to the international guidelines for SFRT for uncomplicated bone metastasis was high and increased over time to 95%, which is the highest reported rate in literature.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7829104
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78291042021-02-01 Adoption of single fraction radiotherapy for uncomplicated bone metastases in a tertiary centre Peters, Cedric Vandewiele, Julie Lievens, Yolande van Eijkeren, Marc Fonteyne, Valérie Boterberg, Tom Deseyne, Pieter Veldeman, Liv De Neve, Wilfried Monten, Chris Braems, Sabine Duprez, Fréderic Vandecasteele, Katrien Ost, Piet Clin Transl Radiat Oncol Original Research Article BACKGROUND: Single-fraction radiotherapy (SFRT) offers equal pain relief for uncomplicated painful bone metastases as compared to multiple-fraction radiotherapy (MFRT). Despite this evidence, the adoption of SFRT has been poor with published rates of SFRT for uncomplicated bone metastases ranging from <10% to 70%. We aimed to evaluate the adoption of SFRT and its evolution over time following the more formal endorsement of the international guidelines in our centre starting from 2013. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of fractionation schedules at our centre for painful uncomplicated bone metastases from January 2013 until December 2017. Only patients treated with 1 × 8 Gy (SFRT-group) or 10 × 3 Gy (MFRT-group) were included. We excluded other fractionation schedules, primary cancer of the bone and post-operative radiotherapy. Uncomplicated was defined as painful but not associated with impending fracture, existing fracture or existing neurological compression. Temporal trends in SFRT/MFRT usage and overall survival were investigated. We performed a lesion-based patterns of care analysis and a patient-based survival analysis. Mann-Whitney U and Chi-square test were used to assess differences between fractionation schedules and temporal trends in prescription, with Kaplan-Meier estimates used for survival analysis (p-value <0.05 considered significant). RESULTS: Overall, 352 patients and 594 uncomplicated bone metastases met inclusion criteria. Patient characteristics were comparable between SFRT and MFRT, except for age. Overall, SFRT was used in 92% of all metastases compared to 8% for MFRT. SFRT rates increased throughout the study period from 85% in 2013 to 95% in 2017 (p = 0.06). Re-irradiation rates were higher in patients treated with SFRT (14%) as compared to MFRT (4%) (p = 0.046). Four-week mortality and median overall survival did not differ significantly between SFRT and MFRT (17% vs 18%, p = 0.8 and 25 weeks vs 38 weeks, p = 0.97, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to the international guidelines for SFRT for uncomplicated bone metastasis was high and increased over time to 95%, which is the highest reported rate in literature. Elsevier 2021-01-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7829104/ /pubmed/33532632 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2021.01.004 Text en © 2021 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Peters, Cedric
Vandewiele, Julie
Lievens, Yolande
van Eijkeren, Marc
Fonteyne, Valérie
Boterberg, Tom
Deseyne, Pieter
Veldeman, Liv
De Neve, Wilfried
Monten, Chris
Braems, Sabine
Duprez, Fréderic
Vandecasteele, Katrien
Ost, Piet
Adoption of single fraction radiotherapy for uncomplicated bone metastases in a tertiary centre
title Adoption of single fraction radiotherapy for uncomplicated bone metastases in a tertiary centre
title_full Adoption of single fraction radiotherapy for uncomplicated bone metastases in a tertiary centre
title_fullStr Adoption of single fraction radiotherapy for uncomplicated bone metastases in a tertiary centre
title_full_unstemmed Adoption of single fraction radiotherapy for uncomplicated bone metastases in a tertiary centre
title_short Adoption of single fraction radiotherapy for uncomplicated bone metastases in a tertiary centre
title_sort adoption of single fraction radiotherapy for uncomplicated bone metastases in a tertiary centre
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7829104/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33532632
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2021.01.004
work_keys_str_mv AT peterscedric adoptionofsinglefractionradiotherapyforuncomplicatedbonemetastasesinatertiarycentre
AT vandewielejulie adoptionofsinglefractionradiotherapyforuncomplicatedbonemetastasesinatertiarycentre
AT lievensyolande adoptionofsinglefractionradiotherapyforuncomplicatedbonemetastasesinatertiarycentre
AT vaneijkerenmarc adoptionofsinglefractionradiotherapyforuncomplicatedbonemetastasesinatertiarycentre
AT fonteynevalerie adoptionofsinglefractionradiotherapyforuncomplicatedbonemetastasesinatertiarycentre
AT boterbergtom adoptionofsinglefractionradiotherapyforuncomplicatedbonemetastasesinatertiarycentre
AT deseynepieter adoptionofsinglefractionradiotherapyforuncomplicatedbonemetastasesinatertiarycentre
AT veldemanliv adoptionofsinglefractionradiotherapyforuncomplicatedbonemetastasesinatertiarycentre
AT denevewilfried adoptionofsinglefractionradiotherapyforuncomplicatedbonemetastasesinatertiarycentre
AT montenchris adoptionofsinglefractionradiotherapyforuncomplicatedbonemetastasesinatertiarycentre
AT braemssabine adoptionofsinglefractionradiotherapyforuncomplicatedbonemetastasesinatertiarycentre
AT duprezfrederic adoptionofsinglefractionradiotherapyforuncomplicatedbonemetastasesinatertiarycentre
AT vandecasteelekatrien adoptionofsinglefractionradiotherapyforuncomplicatedbonemetastasesinatertiarycentre
AT ostpiet adoptionofsinglefractionradiotherapyforuncomplicatedbonemetastasesinatertiarycentre