Cargando…

A Systematic Review of Sources of Outcomes and Cost Data Utilized in Economic Evaluation Research Conducted in the Gulf Cooperation Council

BACKGROUND: Transparency and clarity in reporting of methods used to identify, measure, and value outcomes and resources in published economic evaluations is crucial. OBJECTIVE: The aims of this review were to identify and assess the quality of published economic evaluation studies in the Gulf Coope...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: AlAujan, Shiekha S, Almazrou, Saja H, Al-Aqeel, Sinaa A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7829123/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33505174
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S285359
_version_ 1783641122719924224
author AlAujan, Shiekha S
Almazrou, Saja H
Al-Aqeel, Sinaa A
author_facet AlAujan, Shiekha S
Almazrou, Saja H
Al-Aqeel, Sinaa A
author_sort AlAujan, Shiekha S
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Transparency and clarity in reporting of methods used to identify, measure, and value outcomes and resources in published economic evaluations is crucial. OBJECTIVE: The aims of this review were to identify and assess the quality of published economic evaluation studies in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) region, with a specific focus on methods used to identify, measure, and value cost and outcomes data. METHODS: An electronic search of publications from 2009 to October 2019 was performed in three clinical (Medline, Scopus, and EMBASE) and one economic (NHS EED) databases. Full economic evaluations undertaken in GCC countries from any perspective were included. Reference lists of three reviews on the same topic and area were also searched for further eligible articles. The Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) checklist was used for methodological quality assessment. Data on type and source of cost and outcomes data were collected. RESULTS: Out of 1857 studies identified, 14 relevant studies were eligible and included. Eleven studies were based in Saudi Arabia, and the remaining studies were published in the United Arab of Emirates (UAE), Qatar, and Oman. Majority of the evaluations were based on the Markov modelling (n=8). None of the studies fully fulfilled the CHEERS quality criteria. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) was the main outcome (n=10). The EQ-5D was valued using the UK value set tariff (n=6). Published literature was the source of outcomes data in seven studies. Hospital-based data were used as a source of healthcare resource use data in four studies, whereas hospital-based costs (n = 7) combined with other sources such as local/national data were the sources of unit cost data in the majority of the studies. CONCLUSION: Rigorous economic evaluations are lacking in the region leading to inaccurate information being given to decision-makers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7829123
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78291232021-01-26 A Systematic Review of Sources of Outcomes and Cost Data Utilized in Economic Evaluation Research Conducted in the Gulf Cooperation Council AlAujan, Shiekha S Almazrou, Saja H Al-Aqeel, Sinaa A Risk Manag Healthc Policy Review BACKGROUND: Transparency and clarity in reporting of methods used to identify, measure, and value outcomes and resources in published economic evaluations is crucial. OBJECTIVE: The aims of this review were to identify and assess the quality of published economic evaluation studies in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) region, with a specific focus on methods used to identify, measure, and value cost and outcomes data. METHODS: An electronic search of publications from 2009 to October 2019 was performed in three clinical (Medline, Scopus, and EMBASE) and one economic (NHS EED) databases. Full economic evaluations undertaken in GCC countries from any perspective were included. Reference lists of three reviews on the same topic and area were also searched for further eligible articles. The Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) checklist was used for methodological quality assessment. Data on type and source of cost and outcomes data were collected. RESULTS: Out of 1857 studies identified, 14 relevant studies were eligible and included. Eleven studies were based in Saudi Arabia, and the remaining studies were published in the United Arab of Emirates (UAE), Qatar, and Oman. Majority of the evaluations were based on the Markov modelling (n=8). None of the studies fully fulfilled the CHEERS quality criteria. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) was the main outcome (n=10). The EQ-5D was valued using the UK value set tariff (n=6). Published literature was the source of outcomes data in seven studies. Hospital-based data were used as a source of healthcare resource use data in four studies, whereas hospital-based costs (n = 7) combined with other sources such as local/national data were the sources of unit cost data in the majority of the studies. CONCLUSION: Rigorous economic evaluations are lacking in the region leading to inaccurate information being given to decision-makers. Dove 2021-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7829123/ /pubmed/33505174 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S285359 Text en © 2021 AlAujan et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Review
AlAujan, Shiekha S
Almazrou, Saja H
Al-Aqeel, Sinaa A
A Systematic Review of Sources of Outcomes and Cost Data Utilized in Economic Evaluation Research Conducted in the Gulf Cooperation Council
title A Systematic Review of Sources of Outcomes and Cost Data Utilized in Economic Evaluation Research Conducted in the Gulf Cooperation Council
title_full A Systematic Review of Sources of Outcomes and Cost Data Utilized in Economic Evaluation Research Conducted in the Gulf Cooperation Council
title_fullStr A Systematic Review of Sources of Outcomes and Cost Data Utilized in Economic Evaluation Research Conducted in the Gulf Cooperation Council
title_full_unstemmed A Systematic Review of Sources of Outcomes and Cost Data Utilized in Economic Evaluation Research Conducted in the Gulf Cooperation Council
title_short A Systematic Review of Sources of Outcomes and Cost Data Utilized in Economic Evaluation Research Conducted in the Gulf Cooperation Council
title_sort systematic review of sources of outcomes and cost data utilized in economic evaluation research conducted in the gulf cooperation council
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7829123/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33505174
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S285359
work_keys_str_mv AT alaujanshiekhas asystematicreviewofsourcesofoutcomesandcostdatautilizedineconomicevaluationresearchconductedinthegulfcooperationcouncil
AT almazrousajah asystematicreviewofsourcesofoutcomesandcostdatautilizedineconomicevaluationresearchconductedinthegulfcooperationcouncil
AT alaqeelsinaaa asystematicreviewofsourcesofoutcomesandcostdatautilizedineconomicevaluationresearchconductedinthegulfcooperationcouncil
AT alaujanshiekhas systematicreviewofsourcesofoutcomesandcostdatautilizedineconomicevaluationresearchconductedinthegulfcooperationcouncil
AT almazrousajah systematicreviewofsourcesofoutcomesandcostdatautilizedineconomicevaluationresearchconductedinthegulfcooperationcouncil
AT alaqeelsinaaa systematicreviewofsourcesofoutcomesandcostdatautilizedineconomicevaluationresearchconductedinthegulfcooperationcouncil