Cargando…

Evaluation of Wearable Technology in Dementia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: The objective of this analysis was to systematically review studies employing wearable technology in patients with dementia by quantifying differences in digitally captured physiological endpoints. Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis was based on web searches of Cochrane Da...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cote, Alanna C., Phelps, Riley J., Kabiri, Nina Shaafi, Bhangu, Jaspreet S., Thomas, Kevin “Kip”
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7829192/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33505979
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2020.501104
_version_ 1783641134918008832
author Cote, Alanna C.
Phelps, Riley J.
Kabiri, Nina Shaafi
Bhangu, Jaspreet S.
Thomas, Kevin “Kip”
author_facet Cote, Alanna C.
Phelps, Riley J.
Kabiri, Nina Shaafi
Bhangu, Jaspreet S.
Thomas, Kevin “Kip”
author_sort Cote, Alanna C.
collection PubMed
description Background: The objective of this analysis was to systematically review studies employing wearable technology in patients with dementia by quantifying differences in digitally captured physiological endpoints. Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis was based on web searches of Cochrane Database, PsycInfo, Pubmed, Embase, and IEEE between October 25–31st, 2017. Observational studies providing physiological data measured by wearable technology on participants with dementia with a mean age ≥50. Data were extracted according to PRISMA guidelines and methodological quality assessed independently using Downs and Black criteria. Standardized mean differences between cases and controls were estimated using random-effects models. Results: Forty-eight studies from 18,456 screened abstracts (Dementia: n = 2,516, Control: n = 1,224) met inclusion criteria for the systematic review. Nineteen of these studies were included in one or multiple meta-analyses (Dementia: n = 617, Control: n = 406). Participants with dementia demonstrated lower levels of daily activity (standardized mean difference (SMD), −1.60; 95% CI, −2.66 to −0.55), decreased sleep efficiency (SMD, −0.52; 95% CI, −0.89 to −0.16), and greater intradaily circadian variability (SMD, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.27 to 0.65) than controls, among other measures. Statistical between-study heterogeneity was observed, possibly due to variation in testing duration, device type or patient setting. Conclusions and Relevance: Digitally captured data using wearable devices revealed that adults with dementia were less active, demonstrated increased fragmentation of their sleep-wake cycle and a loss of typical diurnal variation in circadian rhythm as compared to controls.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7829192
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78291922021-01-26 Evaluation of Wearable Technology in Dementia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Cote, Alanna C. Phelps, Riley J. Kabiri, Nina Shaafi Bhangu, Jaspreet S. Thomas, Kevin “Kip” Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine Background: The objective of this analysis was to systematically review studies employing wearable technology in patients with dementia by quantifying differences in digitally captured physiological endpoints. Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis was based on web searches of Cochrane Database, PsycInfo, Pubmed, Embase, and IEEE between October 25–31st, 2017. Observational studies providing physiological data measured by wearable technology on participants with dementia with a mean age ≥50. Data were extracted according to PRISMA guidelines and methodological quality assessed independently using Downs and Black criteria. Standardized mean differences between cases and controls were estimated using random-effects models. Results: Forty-eight studies from 18,456 screened abstracts (Dementia: n = 2,516, Control: n = 1,224) met inclusion criteria for the systematic review. Nineteen of these studies were included in one or multiple meta-analyses (Dementia: n = 617, Control: n = 406). Participants with dementia demonstrated lower levels of daily activity (standardized mean difference (SMD), −1.60; 95% CI, −2.66 to −0.55), decreased sleep efficiency (SMD, −0.52; 95% CI, −0.89 to −0.16), and greater intradaily circadian variability (SMD, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.27 to 0.65) than controls, among other measures. Statistical between-study heterogeneity was observed, possibly due to variation in testing duration, device type or patient setting. Conclusions and Relevance: Digitally captured data using wearable devices revealed that adults with dementia were less active, demonstrated increased fragmentation of their sleep-wake cycle and a loss of typical diurnal variation in circadian rhythm as compared to controls. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-01-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7829192/ /pubmed/33505979 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2020.501104 Text en Copyright © 2021 Cote, Phelps, Kabiri, Bhangu and Thomas. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Medicine
Cote, Alanna C.
Phelps, Riley J.
Kabiri, Nina Shaafi
Bhangu, Jaspreet S.
Thomas, Kevin “Kip”
Evaluation of Wearable Technology in Dementia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Evaluation of Wearable Technology in Dementia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Evaluation of Wearable Technology in Dementia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Evaluation of Wearable Technology in Dementia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Wearable Technology in Dementia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Evaluation of Wearable Technology in Dementia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort evaluation of wearable technology in dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7829192/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33505979
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2020.501104
work_keys_str_mv AT cotealannac evaluationofwearabletechnologyindementiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT phelpsrileyj evaluationofwearabletechnologyindementiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kabirininashaafi evaluationofwearabletechnologyindementiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT bhangujaspreets evaluationofwearabletechnologyindementiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT thomaskevinkip evaluationofwearabletechnologyindementiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis