Cargando…

Intra-rater reliability of measurement of abdominal perimuscular connective tissue thickness on ultrasound images

[Purpose] The thickness of the perimuscular connective tissue (PMCT) reflects muscular atrophy and decreased flexibility that may cause low back pain. However, few studies have used ultrasound imaging to measure PMCT thickness. We aimed to examine and confirm the reliability of ultrasound in measuri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nanikawa, Wataru, Miyazaki, Junya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Society of Physical Therapy Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7829557/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33519071
http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.33.32
_version_ 1783641196021678080
author Nanikawa, Wataru
Miyazaki, Junya
author_facet Nanikawa, Wataru
Miyazaki, Junya
author_sort Nanikawa, Wataru
collection PubMed
description [Purpose] The thickness of the perimuscular connective tissue (PMCT) reflects muscular atrophy and decreased flexibility that may cause low back pain. However, few studies have used ultrasound imaging to measure PMCT thickness. We aimed to examine and confirm the reliability of ultrasound in measuring the thickness of the PMCT of the abdominal wall muscle. [Participants and Methods] The participants were 38 healthy adult males without chronic back pain. The images were acquired in B mode with the participants in the supine position and the PMCT thickness of the abdominal wall muscle was measured on the images. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to confirm reliability. [Results] The ICC for both within-day and between-day PMCT measurements by ultrasound were 0.7–0.9. The 95% confidence interval ranged from 0.5–0.9. The standard error of measurement (SEM) was 0.02–0.1 mm in the abdominal wall muscle and 0.5 mm in the interrecti distance (IRD). The 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of the minimum detectable change (MDC95) was 0.1–0.3 mm in the abdominal wall muscle and 1.3–1.4 mm in the IRD. [Conclusion] We conducted a study to confirm the reliability of ultrasound-based measurement of PMCT thickness of the abdominal wall muscle, and the ICC results established reliability. However, since the values measured were small (0.02–1.4 mm) and there is a limit to visual observation, it was necessary to measure using computer software.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7829557
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The Society of Physical Therapy Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78295572021-01-30 Intra-rater reliability of measurement of abdominal perimuscular connective tissue thickness on ultrasound images Nanikawa, Wataru Miyazaki, Junya J Phys Ther Sci Original Article [Purpose] The thickness of the perimuscular connective tissue (PMCT) reflects muscular atrophy and decreased flexibility that may cause low back pain. However, few studies have used ultrasound imaging to measure PMCT thickness. We aimed to examine and confirm the reliability of ultrasound in measuring the thickness of the PMCT of the abdominal wall muscle. [Participants and Methods] The participants were 38 healthy adult males without chronic back pain. The images were acquired in B mode with the participants in the supine position and the PMCT thickness of the abdominal wall muscle was measured on the images. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to confirm reliability. [Results] The ICC for both within-day and between-day PMCT measurements by ultrasound were 0.7–0.9. The 95% confidence interval ranged from 0.5–0.9. The standard error of measurement (SEM) was 0.02–0.1 mm in the abdominal wall muscle and 0.5 mm in the interrecti distance (IRD). The 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of the minimum detectable change (MDC95) was 0.1–0.3 mm in the abdominal wall muscle and 1.3–1.4 mm in the IRD. [Conclusion] We conducted a study to confirm the reliability of ultrasound-based measurement of PMCT thickness of the abdominal wall muscle, and the ICC results established reliability. However, since the values measured were small (0.02–1.4 mm) and there is a limit to visual observation, it was necessary to measure using computer software. The Society of Physical Therapy Science 2021-01-05 2021-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7829557/ /pubmed/33519071 http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.33.32 Text en 2021©by the Society of Physical Therapy Science. Published by IPEC Inc. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd) License. (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
spellingShingle Original Article
Nanikawa, Wataru
Miyazaki, Junya
Intra-rater reliability of measurement of abdominal perimuscular connective tissue thickness on ultrasound images
title Intra-rater reliability of measurement of abdominal perimuscular connective tissue thickness on ultrasound images
title_full Intra-rater reliability of measurement of abdominal perimuscular connective tissue thickness on ultrasound images
title_fullStr Intra-rater reliability of measurement of abdominal perimuscular connective tissue thickness on ultrasound images
title_full_unstemmed Intra-rater reliability of measurement of abdominal perimuscular connective tissue thickness on ultrasound images
title_short Intra-rater reliability of measurement of abdominal perimuscular connective tissue thickness on ultrasound images
title_sort intra-rater reliability of measurement of abdominal perimuscular connective tissue thickness on ultrasound images
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7829557/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33519071
http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.33.32
work_keys_str_mv AT nanikawawataru intraraterreliabilityofmeasurementofabdominalperimuscularconnectivetissuethicknessonultrasoundimages
AT miyazakijunya intraraterreliabilityofmeasurementofabdominalperimuscularconnectivetissuethicknessonultrasoundimages