Cargando…

Endoscopic Ultrasound vs. Computed Tomography for Gastric Cancer Staging: A Network Meta-Analysis

Gastric cancer preoperative staging is of outmost importance to assure proper management of the disease. Providing a relevant clinical stage relies on different imaging methods such as computed tomography (CT) or endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). We aimed to perform a network meta-analysis for gastric ca...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ungureanu, Bogdan Silviu, Sacerdotianu, Victor Mihai, Turcu-Stiolica, Adina, Cazacu, Irina Mihaela, Saftoiu, Adrian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7829791/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33467164
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11010134
_version_ 1783641250959720448
author Ungureanu, Bogdan Silviu
Sacerdotianu, Victor Mihai
Turcu-Stiolica, Adina
Cazacu, Irina Mihaela
Saftoiu, Adrian
author_facet Ungureanu, Bogdan Silviu
Sacerdotianu, Victor Mihai
Turcu-Stiolica, Adina
Cazacu, Irina Mihaela
Saftoiu, Adrian
author_sort Ungureanu, Bogdan Silviu
collection PubMed
description Gastric cancer preoperative staging is of outmost importance to assure proper management of the disease. Providing a relevant clinical stage relies on different imaging methods such as computed tomography (CT) or endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). We aimed to perform a network meta-analysis for gastric cancer clinical stage diagnostic tests, thus comparing the diagnostic accuracy of EUS vs. multidetector CT (MDCT) and EUS vs. EUS + MDCT. We plotted study estimates of pooled sensitivity and specificity on forest plots and summary receiver operating characteristic space to explore between-study variation in the performance of EUS, MDCT and EUS + MDCT for T1–T4, N0–N3, M0–M1 when data were available. Exploratory analyses were undertaken in RevMan 5. We included twelve studies with 2047 patients. Our results suggest that EUS was superior to MDCT in preoperative T1 and N staging. MDCT is more specific for the M stage but no significant difference in sensitivity was obtained. When comparing EUS vs. EUS + MDCT for T1 both sensitivity and specificity were not relevant. No significant differences were observed in T2–T4 stages. Even though EUS helped differentiate between the presence of invaded nodules, N stages should be carefully assessed by both methods since there is not sufficient data.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7829791
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78297912021-01-26 Endoscopic Ultrasound vs. Computed Tomography for Gastric Cancer Staging: A Network Meta-Analysis Ungureanu, Bogdan Silviu Sacerdotianu, Victor Mihai Turcu-Stiolica, Adina Cazacu, Irina Mihaela Saftoiu, Adrian Diagnostics (Basel) Review Gastric cancer preoperative staging is of outmost importance to assure proper management of the disease. Providing a relevant clinical stage relies on different imaging methods such as computed tomography (CT) or endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). We aimed to perform a network meta-analysis for gastric cancer clinical stage diagnostic tests, thus comparing the diagnostic accuracy of EUS vs. multidetector CT (MDCT) and EUS vs. EUS + MDCT. We plotted study estimates of pooled sensitivity and specificity on forest plots and summary receiver operating characteristic space to explore between-study variation in the performance of EUS, MDCT and EUS + MDCT for T1–T4, N0–N3, M0–M1 when data were available. Exploratory analyses were undertaken in RevMan 5. We included twelve studies with 2047 patients. Our results suggest that EUS was superior to MDCT in preoperative T1 and N staging. MDCT is more specific for the M stage but no significant difference in sensitivity was obtained. When comparing EUS vs. EUS + MDCT for T1 both sensitivity and specificity were not relevant. No significant differences were observed in T2–T4 stages. Even though EUS helped differentiate between the presence of invaded nodules, N stages should be carefully assessed by both methods since there is not sufficient data. MDPI 2021-01-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7829791/ /pubmed/33467164 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11010134 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Ungureanu, Bogdan Silviu
Sacerdotianu, Victor Mihai
Turcu-Stiolica, Adina
Cazacu, Irina Mihaela
Saftoiu, Adrian
Endoscopic Ultrasound vs. Computed Tomography for Gastric Cancer Staging: A Network Meta-Analysis
title Endoscopic Ultrasound vs. Computed Tomography for Gastric Cancer Staging: A Network Meta-Analysis
title_full Endoscopic Ultrasound vs. Computed Tomography for Gastric Cancer Staging: A Network Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Endoscopic Ultrasound vs. Computed Tomography for Gastric Cancer Staging: A Network Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Endoscopic Ultrasound vs. Computed Tomography for Gastric Cancer Staging: A Network Meta-Analysis
title_short Endoscopic Ultrasound vs. Computed Tomography for Gastric Cancer Staging: A Network Meta-Analysis
title_sort endoscopic ultrasound vs. computed tomography for gastric cancer staging: a network meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7829791/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33467164
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11010134
work_keys_str_mv AT ungureanubogdansilviu endoscopicultrasoundvscomputedtomographyforgastriccancerstaginganetworkmetaanalysis
AT sacerdotianuvictormihai endoscopicultrasoundvscomputedtomographyforgastriccancerstaginganetworkmetaanalysis
AT turcustiolicaadina endoscopicultrasoundvscomputedtomographyforgastriccancerstaginganetworkmetaanalysis
AT cazacuirinamihaela endoscopicultrasoundvscomputedtomographyforgastriccancerstaginganetworkmetaanalysis
AT saftoiuadrian endoscopicultrasoundvscomputedtomographyforgastriccancerstaginganetworkmetaanalysis