Cargando…
Contribution to the Understanding of the Interaction between a Polydopamine Molecular Imprint and a Protein Model: Ionic Strength and pH Effect Investigation
Several studies were devoted to the design of molecularly imprinted polymer (MIP)-based sensors for the detection of a given protein. Here, we bring elements that could contribute to the understanding of the interaction mechanism involved in the recognition of a protein by an imprint. For this purpo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7830185/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33477338 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21020619 |
Sumario: | Several studies were devoted to the design of molecularly imprinted polymer (MIP)-based sensors for the detection of a given protein. Here, we bring elements that could contribute to the understanding of the interaction mechanism involved in the recognition of a protein by an imprint. For this purpose, a polydopamine (PDA)-MIP was designed for bovine serum albumin (BSA) recognition. Prior to BSA grafting, the gold surfaces were functionalized with mixed self-assembled monolayers of (MUDA)/(MHOH) (1/9, v/v). The MIP was then elaborated by dopamine electropolymerization and further extraction of BSA templates by incubating the electrode in proteinase K solution. Three complementary techniques, electrochemistry, zetametry, and Fourier-transform infrared spectrometry, were used to investigate pH and ionic strength effects on a MIP’s design and the further recognition process of the analytes by the imprints. Several MIPs were thus designed in acidic, neutral, and basic media and at various ionic strength values. Results indicate that the most appropriate conditions, to achieve a successful MIPs, were an ionic strength of 167 mM and a pH of 7.4. Sensitivity and dissociation constant of the designed sensor were of order of (3.36 ± 0.13) µA·cm(−2)·mg(−1)·mL and (8.56 ± 6.09) × 10(−11) mg/mL, respectively. |
---|