Cargando…
Bioactivity Comparison of Electrospun PCL Mats and Liver Extracellular Matrix as Scaffolds for HepG2 Cells
Cells grown on bioactive matrices have immensely advanced many aspects of biomedical research related to drug delivery and tissue engineering. Our main objective was to perform simple evaluation of the structural and biotic qualities of cell scaffolds made of affordable biomaterials for liver cell l...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7830273/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33467025 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym13020279 |
_version_ | 1783641371294302208 |
---|---|
author | Slivac, Igor Zdraveva, Emilija Ivančić, Fran Žunar, Bojan Holjevac Grgurić, Tamara Gaurina Srček, Višnja Svetec, Ivan-Krešimir Dolenec, Tamara Bajsić, Emi Govorčin Tominac Trcin, Mirna Mijović, Budimir |
author_facet | Slivac, Igor Zdraveva, Emilija Ivančić, Fran Žunar, Bojan Holjevac Grgurić, Tamara Gaurina Srček, Višnja Svetec, Ivan-Krešimir Dolenec, Tamara Bajsić, Emi Govorčin Tominac Trcin, Mirna Mijović, Budimir |
author_sort | Slivac, Igor |
collection | PubMed |
description | Cells grown on bioactive matrices have immensely advanced many aspects of biomedical research related to drug delivery and tissue engineering. Our main objective was to perform simple evaluation of the structural and biotic qualities of cell scaffolds made of affordable biomaterials for liver cell line (HepG2) cultivation in vitro. In this work the electrospun matrix made of synthetic polyester poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) was compared with the natural protein-based extracellular matrix isolated from porcine liver (ECM). Mechanical and structural analysis showed that ECM was about 12 times less resistant to tensile stress while it had significantly larger pore size and twice smaller water contact angle than PCL. Bioactivity assessment included comparison of cell growth and transfection efficiency on cell-seeded scaffolds. Despite the differences in composition and structure between the two respective matrices, the rate of cell spreading and the percentage of transfected cells on both scaffolds were fairly comparable. These results suggest that in an attempt to produce simple, cell carrying structures that adequately simulate the natural scaffold, one can rely on PCL electrospun mats. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7830273 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78302732021-01-26 Bioactivity Comparison of Electrospun PCL Mats and Liver Extracellular Matrix as Scaffolds for HepG2 Cells Slivac, Igor Zdraveva, Emilija Ivančić, Fran Žunar, Bojan Holjevac Grgurić, Tamara Gaurina Srček, Višnja Svetec, Ivan-Krešimir Dolenec, Tamara Bajsić, Emi Govorčin Tominac Trcin, Mirna Mijović, Budimir Polymers (Basel) Article Cells grown on bioactive matrices have immensely advanced many aspects of biomedical research related to drug delivery and tissue engineering. Our main objective was to perform simple evaluation of the structural and biotic qualities of cell scaffolds made of affordable biomaterials for liver cell line (HepG2) cultivation in vitro. In this work the electrospun matrix made of synthetic polyester poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) was compared with the natural protein-based extracellular matrix isolated from porcine liver (ECM). Mechanical and structural analysis showed that ECM was about 12 times less resistant to tensile stress while it had significantly larger pore size and twice smaller water contact angle than PCL. Bioactivity assessment included comparison of cell growth and transfection efficiency on cell-seeded scaffolds. Despite the differences in composition and structure between the two respective matrices, the rate of cell spreading and the percentage of transfected cells on both scaffolds were fairly comparable. These results suggest that in an attempt to produce simple, cell carrying structures that adequately simulate the natural scaffold, one can rely on PCL electrospun mats. MDPI 2021-01-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7830273/ /pubmed/33467025 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym13020279 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Slivac, Igor Zdraveva, Emilija Ivančić, Fran Žunar, Bojan Holjevac Grgurić, Tamara Gaurina Srček, Višnja Svetec, Ivan-Krešimir Dolenec, Tamara Bajsić, Emi Govorčin Tominac Trcin, Mirna Mijović, Budimir Bioactivity Comparison of Electrospun PCL Mats and Liver Extracellular Matrix as Scaffolds for HepG2 Cells |
title | Bioactivity Comparison of Electrospun PCL Mats and Liver Extracellular Matrix as Scaffolds for HepG2 Cells |
title_full | Bioactivity Comparison of Electrospun PCL Mats and Liver Extracellular Matrix as Scaffolds for HepG2 Cells |
title_fullStr | Bioactivity Comparison of Electrospun PCL Mats and Liver Extracellular Matrix as Scaffolds for HepG2 Cells |
title_full_unstemmed | Bioactivity Comparison of Electrospun PCL Mats and Liver Extracellular Matrix as Scaffolds for HepG2 Cells |
title_short | Bioactivity Comparison of Electrospun PCL Mats and Liver Extracellular Matrix as Scaffolds for HepG2 Cells |
title_sort | bioactivity comparison of electrospun pcl mats and liver extracellular matrix as scaffolds for hepg2 cells |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7830273/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33467025 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym13020279 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT slivacigor bioactivitycomparisonofelectrospunpclmatsandliverextracellularmatrixasscaffoldsforhepg2cells AT zdravevaemilija bioactivitycomparisonofelectrospunpclmatsandliverextracellularmatrixasscaffoldsforhepg2cells AT ivancicfran bioactivitycomparisonofelectrospunpclmatsandliverextracellularmatrixasscaffoldsforhepg2cells AT zunarbojan bioactivitycomparisonofelectrospunpclmatsandliverextracellularmatrixasscaffoldsforhepg2cells AT holjevacgrgurictamara bioactivitycomparisonofelectrospunpclmatsandliverextracellularmatrixasscaffoldsforhepg2cells AT gaurinasrcekvisnja bioactivitycomparisonofelectrospunpclmatsandliverextracellularmatrixasscaffoldsforhepg2cells AT svetecivankresimir bioactivitycomparisonofelectrospunpclmatsandliverextracellularmatrixasscaffoldsforhepg2cells AT dolenectamara bioactivitycomparisonofelectrospunpclmatsandliverextracellularmatrixasscaffoldsforhepg2cells AT bajsicemigovorcin bioactivitycomparisonofelectrospunpclmatsandliverextracellularmatrixasscaffoldsforhepg2cells AT tominactrcinmirna bioactivitycomparisonofelectrospunpclmatsandliverextracellularmatrixasscaffoldsforhepg2cells AT mijovicbudimir bioactivitycomparisonofelectrospunpclmatsandliverextracellularmatrixasscaffoldsforhepg2cells |