Cargando…

Bioactivity Comparison of Electrospun PCL Mats and Liver Extracellular Matrix as Scaffolds for HepG2 Cells

Cells grown on bioactive matrices have immensely advanced many aspects of biomedical research related to drug delivery and tissue engineering. Our main objective was to perform simple evaluation of the structural and biotic qualities of cell scaffolds made of affordable biomaterials for liver cell l...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Slivac, Igor, Zdraveva, Emilija, Ivančić, Fran, Žunar, Bojan, Holjevac Grgurić, Tamara, Gaurina Srček, Višnja, Svetec, Ivan-Krešimir, Dolenec, Tamara, Bajsić, Emi Govorčin, Tominac Trcin, Mirna, Mijović, Budimir
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7830273/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33467025
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym13020279
_version_ 1783641371294302208
author Slivac, Igor
Zdraveva, Emilija
Ivančić, Fran
Žunar, Bojan
Holjevac Grgurić, Tamara
Gaurina Srček, Višnja
Svetec, Ivan-Krešimir
Dolenec, Tamara
Bajsić, Emi Govorčin
Tominac Trcin, Mirna
Mijović, Budimir
author_facet Slivac, Igor
Zdraveva, Emilija
Ivančić, Fran
Žunar, Bojan
Holjevac Grgurić, Tamara
Gaurina Srček, Višnja
Svetec, Ivan-Krešimir
Dolenec, Tamara
Bajsić, Emi Govorčin
Tominac Trcin, Mirna
Mijović, Budimir
author_sort Slivac, Igor
collection PubMed
description Cells grown on bioactive matrices have immensely advanced many aspects of biomedical research related to drug delivery and tissue engineering. Our main objective was to perform simple evaluation of the structural and biotic qualities of cell scaffolds made of affordable biomaterials for liver cell line (HepG2) cultivation in vitro. In this work the electrospun matrix made of synthetic polyester poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) was compared with the natural protein-based extracellular matrix isolated from porcine liver (ECM). Mechanical and structural analysis showed that ECM was about 12 times less resistant to tensile stress while it had significantly larger pore size and twice smaller water contact angle than PCL. Bioactivity assessment included comparison of cell growth and transfection efficiency on cell-seeded scaffolds. Despite the differences in composition and structure between the two respective matrices, the rate of cell spreading and the percentage of transfected cells on both scaffolds were fairly comparable. These results suggest that in an attempt to produce simple, cell carrying structures that adequately simulate the natural scaffold, one can rely on PCL electrospun mats.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7830273
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78302732021-01-26 Bioactivity Comparison of Electrospun PCL Mats and Liver Extracellular Matrix as Scaffolds for HepG2 Cells Slivac, Igor Zdraveva, Emilija Ivančić, Fran Žunar, Bojan Holjevac Grgurić, Tamara Gaurina Srček, Višnja Svetec, Ivan-Krešimir Dolenec, Tamara Bajsić, Emi Govorčin Tominac Trcin, Mirna Mijović, Budimir Polymers (Basel) Article Cells grown on bioactive matrices have immensely advanced many aspects of biomedical research related to drug delivery and tissue engineering. Our main objective was to perform simple evaluation of the structural and biotic qualities of cell scaffolds made of affordable biomaterials for liver cell line (HepG2) cultivation in vitro. In this work the electrospun matrix made of synthetic polyester poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) was compared with the natural protein-based extracellular matrix isolated from porcine liver (ECM). Mechanical and structural analysis showed that ECM was about 12 times less resistant to tensile stress while it had significantly larger pore size and twice smaller water contact angle than PCL. Bioactivity assessment included comparison of cell growth and transfection efficiency on cell-seeded scaffolds. Despite the differences in composition and structure between the two respective matrices, the rate of cell spreading and the percentage of transfected cells on both scaffolds were fairly comparable. These results suggest that in an attempt to produce simple, cell carrying structures that adequately simulate the natural scaffold, one can rely on PCL electrospun mats. MDPI 2021-01-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7830273/ /pubmed/33467025 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym13020279 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Slivac, Igor
Zdraveva, Emilija
Ivančić, Fran
Žunar, Bojan
Holjevac Grgurić, Tamara
Gaurina Srček, Višnja
Svetec, Ivan-Krešimir
Dolenec, Tamara
Bajsić, Emi Govorčin
Tominac Trcin, Mirna
Mijović, Budimir
Bioactivity Comparison of Electrospun PCL Mats and Liver Extracellular Matrix as Scaffolds for HepG2 Cells
title Bioactivity Comparison of Electrospun PCL Mats and Liver Extracellular Matrix as Scaffolds for HepG2 Cells
title_full Bioactivity Comparison of Electrospun PCL Mats and Liver Extracellular Matrix as Scaffolds for HepG2 Cells
title_fullStr Bioactivity Comparison of Electrospun PCL Mats and Liver Extracellular Matrix as Scaffolds for HepG2 Cells
title_full_unstemmed Bioactivity Comparison of Electrospun PCL Mats and Liver Extracellular Matrix as Scaffolds for HepG2 Cells
title_short Bioactivity Comparison of Electrospun PCL Mats and Liver Extracellular Matrix as Scaffolds for HepG2 Cells
title_sort bioactivity comparison of electrospun pcl mats and liver extracellular matrix as scaffolds for hepg2 cells
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7830273/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33467025
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym13020279
work_keys_str_mv AT slivacigor bioactivitycomparisonofelectrospunpclmatsandliverextracellularmatrixasscaffoldsforhepg2cells
AT zdravevaemilija bioactivitycomparisonofelectrospunpclmatsandliverextracellularmatrixasscaffoldsforhepg2cells
AT ivancicfran bioactivitycomparisonofelectrospunpclmatsandliverextracellularmatrixasscaffoldsforhepg2cells
AT zunarbojan bioactivitycomparisonofelectrospunpclmatsandliverextracellularmatrixasscaffoldsforhepg2cells
AT holjevacgrgurictamara bioactivitycomparisonofelectrospunpclmatsandliverextracellularmatrixasscaffoldsforhepg2cells
AT gaurinasrcekvisnja bioactivitycomparisonofelectrospunpclmatsandliverextracellularmatrixasscaffoldsforhepg2cells
AT svetecivankresimir bioactivitycomparisonofelectrospunpclmatsandliverextracellularmatrixasscaffoldsforhepg2cells
AT dolenectamara bioactivitycomparisonofelectrospunpclmatsandliverextracellularmatrixasscaffoldsforhepg2cells
AT bajsicemigovorcin bioactivitycomparisonofelectrospunpclmatsandliverextracellularmatrixasscaffoldsforhepg2cells
AT tominactrcinmirna bioactivitycomparisonofelectrospunpclmatsandliverextracellularmatrixasscaffoldsforhepg2cells
AT mijovicbudimir bioactivitycomparisonofelectrospunpclmatsandliverextracellularmatrixasscaffoldsforhepg2cells