Cargando…

Current Advances in 3D Tissue and Organ Reconstruction

Bi-dimensional culture systems have represented the most used method to study cell biology outside the body for over a century. Although they convey useful information, such systems may lose tissue-specific architecture, biomechanical effectors, and biochemical cues deriving from the native extracel...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pennarossa, Georgia, Arcuri, Sharon, De Iorio, Teresina, Gandolfi, Fulvio, Brevini, Tiziana A. L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7830719/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33467648
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms22020830
_version_ 1783641483003297792
author Pennarossa, Georgia
Arcuri, Sharon
De Iorio, Teresina
Gandolfi, Fulvio
Brevini, Tiziana A. L.
author_facet Pennarossa, Georgia
Arcuri, Sharon
De Iorio, Teresina
Gandolfi, Fulvio
Brevini, Tiziana A. L.
author_sort Pennarossa, Georgia
collection PubMed
description Bi-dimensional culture systems have represented the most used method to study cell biology outside the body for over a century. Although they convey useful information, such systems may lose tissue-specific architecture, biomechanical effectors, and biochemical cues deriving from the native extracellular matrix, with significant alterations in several cellular functions and processes. Notably, the introduction of three-dimensional (3D) platforms that are able to re-create in vitro the structures of the native tissue, have overcome some of these issues, since they better mimic the in vivo milieu and reduce the gap between the cell culture ambient and the tissue environment. 3D culture systems are currently used in a broad range of studies, from cancer and stem cell biology, to drug testing and discovery. Here, we describe the mechanisms used by cells to perceive and respond to biomechanical cues and the main signaling pathways involved. We provide an overall perspective of the most recent 3D technologies. Given the breadth of the subject, we concentrate on the use of hydrogels, bioreactors, 3D printing and bioprinting, nanofiber-based scaffolds, and preparation of a decellularized bio-matrix. In addition, we report the possibility to combine the use of 3D cultures with functionalized nanoparticles to obtain highly predictive in vitro models for use in the nanomedicine field.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7830719
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78307192021-01-26 Current Advances in 3D Tissue and Organ Reconstruction Pennarossa, Georgia Arcuri, Sharon De Iorio, Teresina Gandolfi, Fulvio Brevini, Tiziana A. L. Int J Mol Sci Review Bi-dimensional culture systems have represented the most used method to study cell biology outside the body for over a century. Although they convey useful information, such systems may lose tissue-specific architecture, biomechanical effectors, and biochemical cues deriving from the native extracellular matrix, with significant alterations in several cellular functions and processes. Notably, the introduction of three-dimensional (3D) platforms that are able to re-create in vitro the structures of the native tissue, have overcome some of these issues, since they better mimic the in vivo milieu and reduce the gap between the cell culture ambient and the tissue environment. 3D culture systems are currently used in a broad range of studies, from cancer and stem cell biology, to drug testing and discovery. Here, we describe the mechanisms used by cells to perceive and respond to biomechanical cues and the main signaling pathways involved. We provide an overall perspective of the most recent 3D technologies. Given the breadth of the subject, we concentrate on the use of hydrogels, bioreactors, 3D printing and bioprinting, nanofiber-based scaffolds, and preparation of a decellularized bio-matrix. In addition, we report the possibility to combine the use of 3D cultures with functionalized nanoparticles to obtain highly predictive in vitro models for use in the nanomedicine field. MDPI 2021-01-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7830719/ /pubmed/33467648 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms22020830 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Pennarossa, Georgia
Arcuri, Sharon
De Iorio, Teresina
Gandolfi, Fulvio
Brevini, Tiziana A. L.
Current Advances in 3D Tissue and Organ Reconstruction
title Current Advances in 3D Tissue and Organ Reconstruction
title_full Current Advances in 3D Tissue and Organ Reconstruction
title_fullStr Current Advances in 3D Tissue and Organ Reconstruction
title_full_unstemmed Current Advances in 3D Tissue and Organ Reconstruction
title_short Current Advances in 3D Tissue and Organ Reconstruction
title_sort current advances in 3d tissue and organ reconstruction
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7830719/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33467648
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms22020830
work_keys_str_mv AT pennarossageorgia currentadvancesin3dtissueandorganreconstruction
AT arcurisharon currentadvancesin3dtissueandorganreconstruction
AT deiorioteresina currentadvancesin3dtissueandorganreconstruction
AT gandolfifulvio currentadvancesin3dtissueandorganreconstruction
AT brevinitizianaal currentadvancesin3dtissueandorganreconstruction