Cargando…
Clinical Impact of Lymphadenectomy after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Review of Available Data
Recent robust data allow for omitting lymph node dissection for patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) and without any suspicion of lymph node metastases, without compromising recurrence-free survival (RFS), nor overall survival (OS), in the setting of primary surgical treatment. Evi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7830759/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33477449 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10020334 |
_version_ | 1783641489884053504 |
---|---|
author | Seidler, Stephanie Koual, Meriem Achen, Guillaume Bentivegna, Enrica Fournier, Laure Delanoy, Nicolas Nguyen-Xuan, Huyên-Thu Bats, Anne-Sophie Azaïs, Henri |
author_facet | Seidler, Stephanie Koual, Meriem Achen, Guillaume Bentivegna, Enrica Fournier, Laure Delanoy, Nicolas Nguyen-Xuan, Huyên-Thu Bats, Anne-Sophie Azaïs, Henri |
author_sort | Seidler, Stephanie |
collection | PubMed |
description | Recent robust data allow for omitting lymph node dissection for patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) and without any suspicion of lymph node metastases, without compromising recurrence-free survival (RFS), nor overall survival (OS), in the setting of primary surgical treatment. Evidence supporting the same postulate for patients undergoing complete cytoreductive surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is lacking. Throughout a systematic literature review, the aim of our study was to evaluate the impact of lymph node dissection in patients undergoing surgery for advanced-stage EOC after NACT. A total of 1094 patients, included in six retrospective series, underwent either systematic, selective or no lymph node dissection. Only one study reveals a positive effect of lymphadenectomy on OS, and two on RFS. The four remaining series fail to demonstrate any beneficial effect on survival, neither for RFS nor OS. All of them highlight the higher peri- and post-operative complication rate associated with systematic lymph node dissection. Despite heterogeneity in the design of the studies included, there seems to be a trend showing no improvement on OS for systematic lymph node dissection in node negative patients. A well-conducted prospective trial is mandatory to evaluate this matter. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7830759 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78307592021-01-26 Clinical Impact of Lymphadenectomy after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Review of Available Data Seidler, Stephanie Koual, Meriem Achen, Guillaume Bentivegna, Enrica Fournier, Laure Delanoy, Nicolas Nguyen-Xuan, Huyên-Thu Bats, Anne-Sophie Azaïs, Henri J Clin Med Review Recent robust data allow for omitting lymph node dissection for patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) and without any suspicion of lymph node metastases, without compromising recurrence-free survival (RFS), nor overall survival (OS), in the setting of primary surgical treatment. Evidence supporting the same postulate for patients undergoing complete cytoreductive surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is lacking. Throughout a systematic literature review, the aim of our study was to evaluate the impact of lymph node dissection in patients undergoing surgery for advanced-stage EOC after NACT. A total of 1094 patients, included in six retrospective series, underwent either systematic, selective or no lymph node dissection. Only one study reveals a positive effect of lymphadenectomy on OS, and two on RFS. The four remaining series fail to demonstrate any beneficial effect on survival, neither for RFS nor OS. All of them highlight the higher peri- and post-operative complication rate associated with systematic lymph node dissection. Despite heterogeneity in the design of the studies included, there seems to be a trend showing no improvement on OS for systematic lymph node dissection in node negative patients. A well-conducted prospective trial is mandatory to evaluate this matter. MDPI 2021-01-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7830759/ /pubmed/33477449 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10020334 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Seidler, Stephanie Koual, Meriem Achen, Guillaume Bentivegna, Enrica Fournier, Laure Delanoy, Nicolas Nguyen-Xuan, Huyên-Thu Bats, Anne-Sophie Azaïs, Henri Clinical Impact of Lymphadenectomy after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Review of Available Data |
title | Clinical Impact of Lymphadenectomy after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Review of Available Data |
title_full | Clinical Impact of Lymphadenectomy after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Review of Available Data |
title_fullStr | Clinical Impact of Lymphadenectomy after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Review of Available Data |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical Impact of Lymphadenectomy after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Review of Available Data |
title_short | Clinical Impact of Lymphadenectomy after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Review of Available Data |
title_sort | clinical impact of lymphadenectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a review of available data |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7830759/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33477449 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10020334 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT seidlerstephanie clinicalimpactoflymphadenectomyafterneoadjuvantchemotherapyinadvancedepithelialovariancancerareviewofavailabledata AT koualmeriem clinicalimpactoflymphadenectomyafterneoadjuvantchemotherapyinadvancedepithelialovariancancerareviewofavailabledata AT achenguillaume clinicalimpactoflymphadenectomyafterneoadjuvantchemotherapyinadvancedepithelialovariancancerareviewofavailabledata AT bentivegnaenrica clinicalimpactoflymphadenectomyafterneoadjuvantchemotherapyinadvancedepithelialovariancancerareviewofavailabledata AT fournierlaure clinicalimpactoflymphadenectomyafterneoadjuvantchemotherapyinadvancedepithelialovariancancerareviewofavailabledata AT delanoynicolas clinicalimpactoflymphadenectomyafterneoadjuvantchemotherapyinadvancedepithelialovariancancerareviewofavailabledata AT nguyenxuanhuyenthu clinicalimpactoflymphadenectomyafterneoadjuvantchemotherapyinadvancedepithelialovariancancerareviewofavailabledata AT batsannesophie clinicalimpactoflymphadenectomyafterneoadjuvantchemotherapyinadvancedepithelialovariancancerareviewofavailabledata AT azaishenri clinicalimpactoflymphadenectomyafterneoadjuvantchemotherapyinadvancedepithelialovariancancerareviewofavailabledata |