Cargando…

Clinical Impact of Lymphadenectomy after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Review of Available Data

Recent robust data allow for omitting lymph node dissection for patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) and without any suspicion of lymph node metastases, without compromising recurrence-free survival (RFS), nor overall survival (OS), in the setting of primary surgical treatment. Evi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Seidler, Stephanie, Koual, Meriem, Achen, Guillaume, Bentivegna, Enrica, Fournier, Laure, Delanoy, Nicolas, Nguyen-Xuan, Huyên-Thu, Bats, Anne-Sophie, Azaïs, Henri
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7830759/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33477449
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10020334
_version_ 1783641489884053504
author Seidler, Stephanie
Koual, Meriem
Achen, Guillaume
Bentivegna, Enrica
Fournier, Laure
Delanoy, Nicolas
Nguyen-Xuan, Huyên-Thu
Bats, Anne-Sophie
Azaïs, Henri
author_facet Seidler, Stephanie
Koual, Meriem
Achen, Guillaume
Bentivegna, Enrica
Fournier, Laure
Delanoy, Nicolas
Nguyen-Xuan, Huyên-Thu
Bats, Anne-Sophie
Azaïs, Henri
author_sort Seidler, Stephanie
collection PubMed
description Recent robust data allow for omitting lymph node dissection for patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) and without any suspicion of lymph node metastases, without compromising recurrence-free survival (RFS), nor overall survival (OS), in the setting of primary surgical treatment. Evidence supporting the same postulate for patients undergoing complete cytoreductive surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is lacking. Throughout a systematic literature review, the aim of our study was to evaluate the impact of lymph node dissection in patients undergoing surgery for advanced-stage EOC after NACT. A total of 1094 patients, included in six retrospective series, underwent either systematic, selective or no lymph node dissection. Only one study reveals a positive effect of lymphadenectomy on OS, and two on RFS. The four remaining series fail to demonstrate any beneficial effect on survival, neither for RFS nor OS. All of them highlight the higher peri- and post-operative complication rate associated with systematic lymph node dissection. Despite heterogeneity in the design of the studies included, there seems to be a trend showing no improvement on OS for systematic lymph node dissection in node negative patients. A well-conducted prospective trial is mandatory to evaluate this matter.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7830759
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78307592021-01-26 Clinical Impact of Lymphadenectomy after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Review of Available Data Seidler, Stephanie Koual, Meriem Achen, Guillaume Bentivegna, Enrica Fournier, Laure Delanoy, Nicolas Nguyen-Xuan, Huyên-Thu Bats, Anne-Sophie Azaïs, Henri J Clin Med Review Recent robust data allow for omitting lymph node dissection for patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) and without any suspicion of lymph node metastases, without compromising recurrence-free survival (RFS), nor overall survival (OS), in the setting of primary surgical treatment. Evidence supporting the same postulate for patients undergoing complete cytoreductive surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is lacking. Throughout a systematic literature review, the aim of our study was to evaluate the impact of lymph node dissection in patients undergoing surgery for advanced-stage EOC after NACT. A total of 1094 patients, included in six retrospective series, underwent either systematic, selective or no lymph node dissection. Only one study reveals a positive effect of lymphadenectomy on OS, and two on RFS. The four remaining series fail to demonstrate any beneficial effect on survival, neither for RFS nor OS. All of them highlight the higher peri- and post-operative complication rate associated with systematic lymph node dissection. Despite heterogeneity in the design of the studies included, there seems to be a trend showing no improvement on OS for systematic lymph node dissection in node negative patients. A well-conducted prospective trial is mandatory to evaluate this matter. MDPI 2021-01-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7830759/ /pubmed/33477449 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10020334 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Seidler, Stephanie
Koual, Meriem
Achen, Guillaume
Bentivegna, Enrica
Fournier, Laure
Delanoy, Nicolas
Nguyen-Xuan, Huyên-Thu
Bats, Anne-Sophie
Azaïs, Henri
Clinical Impact of Lymphadenectomy after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Review of Available Data
title Clinical Impact of Lymphadenectomy after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Review of Available Data
title_full Clinical Impact of Lymphadenectomy after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Review of Available Data
title_fullStr Clinical Impact of Lymphadenectomy after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Review of Available Data
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Impact of Lymphadenectomy after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Review of Available Data
title_short Clinical Impact of Lymphadenectomy after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Review of Available Data
title_sort clinical impact of lymphadenectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a review of available data
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7830759/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33477449
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10020334
work_keys_str_mv AT seidlerstephanie clinicalimpactoflymphadenectomyafterneoadjuvantchemotherapyinadvancedepithelialovariancancerareviewofavailabledata
AT koualmeriem clinicalimpactoflymphadenectomyafterneoadjuvantchemotherapyinadvancedepithelialovariancancerareviewofavailabledata
AT achenguillaume clinicalimpactoflymphadenectomyafterneoadjuvantchemotherapyinadvancedepithelialovariancancerareviewofavailabledata
AT bentivegnaenrica clinicalimpactoflymphadenectomyafterneoadjuvantchemotherapyinadvancedepithelialovariancancerareviewofavailabledata
AT fournierlaure clinicalimpactoflymphadenectomyafterneoadjuvantchemotherapyinadvancedepithelialovariancancerareviewofavailabledata
AT delanoynicolas clinicalimpactoflymphadenectomyafterneoadjuvantchemotherapyinadvancedepithelialovariancancerareviewofavailabledata
AT nguyenxuanhuyenthu clinicalimpactoflymphadenectomyafterneoadjuvantchemotherapyinadvancedepithelialovariancancerareviewofavailabledata
AT batsannesophie clinicalimpactoflymphadenectomyafterneoadjuvantchemotherapyinadvancedepithelialovariancancerareviewofavailabledata
AT azaishenri clinicalimpactoflymphadenectomyafterneoadjuvantchemotherapyinadvancedepithelialovariancancerareviewofavailabledata