Cargando…
Teaching the Evaluation of Female Pelvic Pain: A Hands-On Simulation to Reinforce Exam Skills and Introduce Transvaginal Ultrasound
INTRODUCTION: Reproductive-age female patients commonly seek evaluation for pelvic pain in a variety of health care settings. Thus, teaching medical students how to effectively evaluate female pelvic pain is a necessary part of medical education. There are limited opportunities, however, to reinforc...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Association of American Medical Colleges
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7830760/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33511274 http://dx.doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11080 |
Sumario: | INTRODUCTION: Reproductive-age female patients commonly seek evaluation for pelvic pain in a variety of health care settings. Thus, teaching medical students how to effectively evaluate female pelvic pain is a necessary part of medical education. There are limited opportunities, however, to reinforce the needed skills for this common but sensitive presentation that can be anxiety-producing for preclinical students. METHODS: The case involved a 23-year-old female presenting with lower abdominal/pelvic pain. Students performed the necessary history, physical examination, cervical sampling, and transvaginal ultrasound evaluation to make the diagnosis of pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) complicated by a tubo-ovarian abscess. The 30-minute simulated patient encounter was followed by a 30–40 minute faculty-led debrief. RESULTS: This simulation case has been sustained in the curriculum since 2011 for 65 students per year. Through use of a faculty critical action checklist, debrief discussion, examination performance, and student evaluation feedback, this simulation has demonstrated effectiveness. Of students, 93 of 193 students (48%) who participated in the simulation case from 2018–2020 completed a survey in which they rated the degree of agreement with statements about the simulation based on a 5-point Likert Scale (1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree). All questions had a mean response of 4.5–4.8 in 2018–2020, demonstrating the consistent agreement by students of the clarity, fidelity, and knowledge-enhancing value of the simulation. DISCUSSION: This simulation provided a useful opportunity and a safe environment for preclinical medical students to acquire knowledge and skills necessary to evaluate a female patient with pelvic pain and PID. |
---|