Cargando…
Impact of Different Positive End-Expiratory Pressures on Lung Mechanics in the Setting of Moderately Elevated Intra-Abdominal Pressure and Acute Lung Injury in a Porcine Model
The effects of a moderately elevated intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) on lung mechanics in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) have still not been fully analyzed. Moreover, the optimal positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in elevated IAP and ARDS is unclear. In this paper, 18 pigs under gene...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7830768/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33467666 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10020306 |
_version_ | 1783641492194066432 |
---|---|
author | Fiedler, Mascha O. Simeliunas, Emilis Deutsch, B. Luise Diktanaite, Dovile Harms, Alexander Brune, Maik Dietrich, Maximilian Uhle, Florian Weigand, Markus A. Kalenka, Armin |
author_facet | Fiedler, Mascha O. Simeliunas, Emilis Deutsch, B. Luise Diktanaite, Dovile Harms, Alexander Brune, Maik Dietrich, Maximilian Uhle, Florian Weigand, Markus A. Kalenka, Armin |
author_sort | Fiedler, Mascha O. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The effects of a moderately elevated intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) on lung mechanics in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) have still not been fully analyzed. Moreover, the optimal positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in elevated IAP and ARDS is unclear. In this paper, 18 pigs under general anesthesia received a double hit lung injury. After saline lung lavage and 2 h of injurious mechanical ventilation to induce an acute lung injury (ALI), an intra-abdominal balloon was filled until an IAP of 10 mmHg was generated. Animals were randomly assigned to one of three groups (group A = PEEP 5, B = PEEP 10 and C = PEEP 15 cmH(2)O) and ventilated for 6 h. We measured end-expiratory lung volume (EELV) per kg bodyweight, driving pressure (ΔP), transpulmonary pressure (ΔP(L)), static lung compliance (C(stat)), oxygenation (P/F ratio) and cardiac index (CI). In group A, we found increases in ΔP (22 ± 1 vs. 28 ± 2 cmH(2)O; p = 0.006) and ΔP(L) (16 ± 1 vs. 22 ± 2 cmH(2)O; p = 0.007), with no change in EELV/kg (15 ± 1 vs. 14 ± 1 mL/kg) when comparing hours 0 and 6. In group B, there was no change in ΔP (26 ± 2 vs. 25 ± 2 cmH(2)O), ΔP(L) (19 ± 2 vs. 18 ± 2 cmH(2)O), C(stat) (21 ± 3 vs. 21 ± 2 cmH(2)O/mL) or EELV/kg (12 ± 2 vs. 13 ± 3 mL/kg). ΔP and ΔP(L) were significantly lower after 6 h when comparing between group C and A (21 ± 1 vs. 28 ± 2 cmH(2)O; p = 0.020) and (14 ± 1 vs. 22 ± 2 cmH(2)O; p = 0.013)). The EELV/kg increased over time in group C (13 ± 1 vs. 19 ± 2 mL/kg; p = 0.034). The P/F ratio increased in all groups over time. CI decreased in groups B and C. The global lung injury score did not significantly differ between groups (A: 0.25 ± 0.05, B: 0.21 ± 0.02, C: 0.22 ± 0.03). In this model of ALI, elevated IAP, ΔP and ΔP(L) increased further over time in the group with a PEEP of 5 cmH(2)O applied over 6 h. This was not the case in the groups with a PEEP of 10 and 15 cmH(2)O. Although ΔP and ΔP(L) were significantly lower after 6 hours in group C compared to group A, we could not show significant differences in histological lung injury score. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7830768 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78307682021-01-26 Impact of Different Positive End-Expiratory Pressures on Lung Mechanics in the Setting of Moderately Elevated Intra-Abdominal Pressure and Acute Lung Injury in a Porcine Model Fiedler, Mascha O. Simeliunas, Emilis Deutsch, B. Luise Diktanaite, Dovile Harms, Alexander Brune, Maik Dietrich, Maximilian Uhle, Florian Weigand, Markus A. Kalenka, Armin J Clin Med Article The effects of a moderately elevated intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) on lung mechanics in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) have still not been fully analyzed. Moreover, the optimal positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in elevated IAP and ARDS is unclear. In this paper, 18 pigs under general anesthesia received a double hit lung injury. After saline lung lavage and 2 h of injurious mechanical ventilation to induce an acute lung injury (ALI), an intra-abdominal balloon was filled until an IAP of 10 mmHg was generated. Animals were randomly assigned to one of three groups (group A = PEEP 5, B = PEEP 10 and C = PEEP 15 cmH(2)O) and ventilated for 6 h. We measured end-expiratory lung volume (EELV) per kg bodyweight, driving pressure (ΔP), transpulmonary pressure (ΔP(L)), static lung compliance (C(stat)), oxygenation (P/F ratio) and cardiac index (CI). In group A, we found increases in ΔP (22 ± 1 vs. 28 ± 2 cmH(2)O; p = 0.006) and ΔP(L) (16 ± 1 vs. 22 ± 2 cmH(2)O; p = 0.007), with no change in EELV/kg (15 ± 1 vs. 14 ± 1 mL/kg) when comparing hours 0 and 6. In group B, there was no change in ΔP (26 ± 2 vs. 25 ± 2 cmH(2)O), ΔP(L) (19 ± 2 vs. 18 ± 2 cmH(2)O), C(stat) (21 ± 3 vs. 21 ± 2 cmH(2)O/mL) or EELV/kg (12 ± 2 vs. 13 ± 3 mL/kg). ΔP and ΔP(L) were significantly lower after 6 h when comparing between group C and A (21 ± 1 vs. 28 ± 2 cmH(2)O; p = 0.020) and (14 ± 1 vs. 22 ± 2 cmH(2)O; p = 0.013)). The EELV/kg increased over time in group C (13 ± 1 vs. 19 ± 2 mL/kg; p = 0.034). The P/F ratio increased in all groups over time. CI decreased in groups B and C. The global lung injury score did not significantly differ between groups (A: 0.25 ± 0.05, B: 0.21 ± 0.02, C: 0.22 ± 0.03). In this model of ALI, elevated IAP, ΔP and ΔP(L) increased further over time in the group with a PEEP of 5 cmH(2)O applied over 6 h. This was not the case in the groups with a PEEP of 10 and 15 cmH(2)O. Although ΔP and ΔP(L) were significantly lower after 6 hours in group C compared to group A, we could not show significant differences in histological lung injury score. MDPI 2021-01-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7830768/ /pubmed/33467666 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10020306 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Fiedler, Mascha O. Simeliunas, Emilis Deutsch, B. Luise Diktanaite, Dovile Harms, Alexander Brune, Maik Dietrich, Maximilian Uhle, Florian Weigand, Markus A. Kalenka, Armin Impact of Different Positive End-Expiratory Pressures on Lung Mechanics in the Setting of Moderately Elevated Intra-Abdominal Pressure and Acute Lung Injury in a Porcine Model |
title | Impact of Different Positive End-Expiratory Pressures on Lung Mechanics in the Setting of Moderately Elevated Intra-Abdominal Pressure and Acute Lung Injury in a Porcine Model |
title_full | Impact of Different Positive End-Expiratory Pressures on Lung Mechanics in the Setting of Moderately Elevated Intra-Abdominal Pressure and Acute Lung Injury in a Porcine Model |
title_fullStr | Impact of Different Positive End-Expiratory Pressures on Lung Mechanics in the Setting of Moderately Elevated Intra-Abdominal Pressure and Acute Lung Injury in a Porcine Model |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of Different Positive End-Expiratory Pressures on Lung Mechanics in the Setting of Moderately Elevated Intra-Abdominal Pressure and Acute Lung Injury in a Porcine Model |
title_short | Impact of Different Positive End-Expiratory Pressures on Lung Mechanics in the Setting of Moderately Elevated Intra-Abdominal Pressure and Acute Lung Injury in a Porcine Model |
title_sort | impact of different positive end-expiratory pressures on lung mechanics in the setting of moderately elevated intra-abdominal pressure and acute lung injury in a porcine model |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7830768/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33467666 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10020306 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fiedlermaschao impactofdifferentpositiveendexpiratorypressuresonlungmechanicsinthesettingofmoderatelyelevatedintraabdominalpressureandacutelunginjuryinaporcinemodel AT simeliunasemilis impactofdifferentpositiveendexpiratorypressuresonlungmechanicsinthesettingofmoderatelyelevatedintraabdominalpressureandacutelunginjuryinaporcinemodel AT deutschbluise impactofdifferentpositiveendexpiratorypressuresonlungmechanicsinthesettingofmoderatelyelevatedintraabdominalpressureandacutelunginjuryinaporcinemodel AT diktanaitedovile impactofdifferentpositiveendexpiratorypressuresonlungmechanicsinthesettingofmoderatelyelevatedintraabdominalpressureandacutelunginjuryinaporcinemodel AT harmsalexander impactofdifferentpositiveendexpiratorypressuresonlungmechanicsinthesettingofmoderatelyelevatedintraabdominalpressureandacutelunginjuryinaporcinemodel AT brunemaik impactofdifferentpositiveendexpiratorypressuresonlungmechanicsinthesettingofmoderatelyelevatedintraabdominalpressureandacutelunginjuryinaporcinemodel AT dietrichmaximilian impactofdifferentpositiveendexpiratorypressuresonlungmechanicsinthesettingofmoderatelyelevatedintraabdominalpressureandacutelunginjuryinaporcinemodel AT uhleflorian impactofdifferentpositiveendexpiratorypressuresonlungmechanicsinthesettingofmoderatelyelevatedintraabdominalpressureandacutelunginjuryinaporcinemodel AT weigandmarkusa impactofdifferentpositiveendexpiratorypressuresonlungmechanicsinthesettingofmoderatelyelevatedintraabdominalpressureandacutelunginjuryinaporcinemodel AT kalenkaarmin impactofdifferentpositiveendexpiratorypressuresonlungmechanicsinthesettingofmoderatelyelevatedintraabdominalpressureandacutelunginjuryinaporcinemodel |