Cargando…
Machine Learning-Based Microclimate Model for Indoor Air Temperature and Relative Humidity Prediction in a Swine Building
SIMPLE SUMMARY: Indoor air temperature (IAT) and indoor relative humidity (IRH) are the prominent microclimatic variables. Among other livestock animals, pigs are more sensitive to environmental equilibrium; a lack of favorable environment in barns affects the productivity parameters such as volunta...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7831115/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33477540 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani11010222 |
Sumario: | SIMPLE SUMMARY: Indoor air temperature (IAT) and indoor relative humidity (IRH) are the prominent microclimatic variables. Among other livestock animals, pigs are more sensitive to environmental equilibrium; a lack of favorable environment in barns affects the productivity parameters such as voluntary feed intake, feed conversion, heat stress, etc. Machine learning (ML) based prediction models are utilized for solving various nonlinear problems in the current decade. Meanwhile, multiple linear regression (MLR), multilayered perceptron (MLP), random forest regression (RFR), decision tree regression (DTR), and support vector regression (SVR) models were utilized for the prediction. Typically, most of the available IAT and IRH models are limited to feed the animal biological data as the input. Since the biological factors of the internal animals are challenging to acquire, this study used accessible factors such as external environmental data to simulate the models. Three different input datasets named S1 (weather station parameters), S2 (weather station parameters and indoor attributes), and S3 (Highly correlated values) were used to assess the models. From the results, RFR models performed better results in both IAT (R(2) = 0.9913; RMSE = 0.476; MAE = 0.3535) and IRH (R(2) = 0.9594; RMSE = 2.429; MAE = 1.47) prediction with S3 input datasets. In addition, it has been proven that selecting the right features from the given input data builds supportive conditions under which the expected results are available. ABSTRACT: Indoor air temperature (IAT) and indoor relative humidity (IRH) are the prominent microclimatic variables; still, potential contributors that influence the homeostasis of livestock animals reared in closed barns. Further, predicting IAT and IRH encourages farmers to think ahead actively and to prepare the optimum solutions. Therefore, the primary objective of the current literature is to build and investigate extensive performance analysis between popular ML models in practice used for IAT and IRH predictions. Meanwhile, multiple linear regression (MLR), multilayered perceptron (MLP), random forest regression (RFR), decision tree regression (DTR), and support vector regression (SVR) models were utilized for the prediction. This study used accessible factors such as external environmental data to simulate the models. In addition, three different input datasets named S1, S2, and S3 were used to assess the models. From the results, RFR models performed better results in both IAT (R(2) = 0.9913; RMSE = 0.476; MAE = 0.3535) and IRH (R(2) = 0.9594; RMSE = 2.429; MAE = 1.47) prediction among other models particularly with S3 input datasets. In addition, it has been proven that selecting the right features from the given input data builds supportive conditions under which the expected results are available. Overall, the current study demonstrates a better model among other models to predict IAT and IRH of a naturally ventilated swine building containing animals with fewer input attributes. |
---|