Cargando…

National survey regarding the timing of endoscopic procedures during the COVID-19 pandemic

BACKGROUND: During the COVID-19 pandemic, several questions have arisen about which endoscopic procedures (EPs) must be performed and which ones can be postponed. The aim of this study was to conduct a nationwide survey regarding the appropriate timing of EPs during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marroquín-Reyes, José Daniel, Zepeda-Gómez, Sergio, Tepox-Padrón, Alejandra, Quintanar-Martínez, Mariana, Trujillo-Benavides, Omar Edel, Téllez-Avila, Félix I.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7831145/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33492499
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08290-8
_version_ 1783641576079097856
author Marroquín-Reyes, José Daniel
Zepeda-Gómez, Sergio
Tepox-Padrón, Alejandra
Quintanar-Martínez, Mariana
Trujillo-Benavides, Omar Edel
Téllez-Avila, Félix I.
author_facet Marroquín-Reyes, José Daniel
Zepeda-Gómez, Sergio
Tepox-Padrón, Alejandra
Quintanar-Martínez, Mariana
Trujillo-Benavides, Omar Edel
Téllez-Avila, Félix I.
author_sort Marroquín-Reyes, José Daniel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: During the COVID-19 pandemic, several questions have arisen about which endoscopic procedures (EPs) must be performed and which ones can be postponed. The aim of this study was to conduct a nationwide survey regarding the appropriate timing of EPs during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: This prospective study was performed through a nationwide electronic survey. The survey consisted of 15 questions divided into three sections. The first evaluated the agreement for EPs classified as “time sensitive” and “not time sensitive”. Two other sections assessed “high-priority” and “low-priority” scenarios. Agreement was considered when > 75% of respondents answered a question in the same direction. RESULTS: The response rate was 27.2% (214/784). Among the respondents, agreement for the need to perform EP in < 72 h was only reached for variceal bleeding (93.4%). Dysphagia with alarm symptoms was the scenario in which the highest percentage of physicians (95.9%) agreed that an EP needed to be performed within a month. Less than 30% of endoscopists would perform an EP within the first 72 h for patients with mild cholangitis, non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding without hemodynamic instability, or severe anaemia without overt bleeding. In time-sensitive clinical scenarios suggestive of benign disease, none of the scenarios reached agreement in any sense. Among the time-sensitive clinical scenarios suggestive of malignancy, > 90% of the surveyed respondents considered that EP could not be postponed for > 8 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: There was no consensus among endoscopists about the timing of EPs in patients with pathologies considered time sensitive or in those with high-priority pathologies. Agreement was only reached in five (17%) of the evaluated clinical scenarios. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00464-021-08290-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7831145
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78311452021-01-25 National survey regarding the timing of endoscopic procedures during the COVID-19 pandemic Marroquín-Reyes, José Daniel Zepeda-Gómez, Sergio Tepox-Padrón, Alejandra Quintanar-Martínez, Mariana Trujillo-Benavides, Omar Edel Téllez-Avila, Félix I. Surg Endosc Article BACKGROUND: During the COVID-19 pandemic, several questions have arisen about which endoscopic procedures (EPs) must be performed and which ones can be postponed. The aim of this study was to conduct a nationwide survey regarding the appropriate timing of EPs during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: This prospective study was performed through a nationwide electronic survey. The survey consisted of 15 questions divided into three sections. The first evaluated the agreement for EPs classified as “time sensitive” and “not time sensitive”. Two other sections assessed “high-priority” and “low-priority” scenarios. Agreement was considered when > 75% of respondents answered a question in the same direction. RESULTS: The response rate was 27.2% (214/784). Among the respondents, agreement for the need to perform EP in < 72 h was only reached for variceal bleeding (93.4%). Dysphagia with alarm symptoms was the scenario in which the highest percentage of physicians (95.9%) agreed that an EP needed to be performed within a month. Less than 30% of endoscopists would perform an EP within the first 72 h for patients with mild cholangitis, non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding without hemodynamic instability, or severe anaemia without overt bleeding. In time-sensitive clinical scenarios suggestive of benign disease, none of the scenarios reached agreement in any sense. Among the time-sensitive clinical scenarios suggestive of malignancy, > 90% of the surveyed respondents considered that EP could not be postponed for > 8 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: There was no consensus among endoscopists about the timing of EPs in patients with pathologies considered time sensitive or in those with high-priority pathologies. Agreement was only reached in five (17%) of the evaluated clinical scenarios. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00464-021-08290-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2021-01-25 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC7831145/ /pubmed/33492499 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08290-8 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC part of Springer Nature 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Article
Marroquín-Reyes, José Daniel
Zepeda-Gómez, Sergio
Tepox-Padrón, Alejandra
Quintanar-Martínez, Mariana
Trujillo-Benavides, Omar Edel
Téllez-Avila, Félix I.
National survey regarding the timing of endoscopic procedures during the COVID-19 pandemic
title National survey regarding the timing of endoscopic procedures during the COVID-19 pandemic
title_full National survey regarding the timing of endoscopic procedures during the COVID-19 pandemic
title_fullStr National survey regarding the timing of endoscopic procedures during the COVID-19 pandemic
title_full_unstemmed National survey regarding the timing of endoscopic procedures during the COVID-19 pandemic
title_short National survey regarding the timing of endoscopic procedures during the COVID-19 pandemic
title_sort national survey regarding the timing of endoscopic procedures during the covid-19 pandemic
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7831145/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33492499
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08290-8
work_keys_str_mv AT marroquinreyesjosedaniel nationalsurveyregardingthetimingofendoscopicproceduresduringthecovid19pandemic
AT zepedagomezsergio nationalsurveyregardingthetimingofendoscopicproceduresduringthecovid19pandemic
AT tepoxpadronalejandra nationalsurveyregardingthetimingofendoscopicproceduresduringthecovid19pandemic
AT quintanarmartinezmariana nationalsurveyregardingthetimingofendoscopicproceduresduringthecovid19pandemic
AT trujillobenavidesomaredel nationalsurveyregardingthetimingofendoscopicproceduresduringthecovid19pandemic
AT tellezavilafelixi nationalsurveyregardingthetimingofendoscopicproceduresduringthecovid19pandemic