Cargando…
‘Most at risk’ for COVID19? The imperative to expand the definition from biological to social factors for equity
First recognized in December 2019, the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID19) was declared a global pandemic by the World Health Organization on March 11, 2020. To date, the most utilized definition of ‘most at risk’ for COVID19 morbidity and mortality has focused on biological susceptibility to the vir...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7831462/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32763263 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106229 |
_version_ | 1783641627413184512 |
---|---|
author | Afifi, Rima A. Novak, Nicole Gilbert, Paul A. Pauly, Bernadette Abdulrahim, Sawsan Rashid, Sabina Faiz Ortega, Fernando Ferrand, Rashida A. |
author_facet | Afifi, Rima A. Novak, Nicole Gilbert, Paul A. Pauly, Bernadette Abdulrahim, Sawsan Rashid, Sabina Faiz Ortega, Fernando Ferrand, Rashida A. |
author_sort | Afifi, Rima A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | First recognized in December 2019, the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID19) was declared a global pandemic by the World Health Organization on March 11, 2020. To date, the most utilized definition of ‘most at risk’ for COVID19 morbidity and mortality has focused on biological susceptibility to the virus. This paper argues that this dominant biomedical definition has neglected the ‘fundamental social causes’ of disease, constraining the effectiveness of prevention and mitigation measures; and exacerbating COVID19 morbidity and mortality for population groups living in marginalizing circumstances. It is clear - even at this early stage of the pandemic - that inequitable social conditions lead to both more infections and worse outcomes. Expanding the definition of ‘most at risk’ to include social factors is critical to implementing equitable interventions and saving lives. Prioritizing populations with social conditions is necessary for more effective control of the epidemic in its next phase; and should become standard in the planning for, and prevention and mitigation of all health conditions. Reversing disparities and health inequities is only possible through an expansion of our ‘most-at-risk’ definition to also include social factors. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7831462 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Elsevier Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78314622021-01-26 ‘Most at risk’ for COVID19? The imperative to expand the definition from biological to social factors for equity Afifi, Rima A. Novak, Nicole Gilbert, Paul A. Pauly, Bernadette Abdulrahim, Sawsan Rashid, Sabina Faiz Ortega, Fernando Ferrand, Rashida A. Prev Med Commentary First recognized in December 2019, the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID19) was declared a global pandemic by the World Health Organization on March 11, 2020. To date, the most utilized definition of ‘most at risk’ for COVID19 morbidity and mortality has focused on biological susceptibility to the virus. This paper argues that this dominant biomedical definition has neglected the ‘fundamental social causes’ of disease, constraining the effectiveness of prevention and mitigation measures; and exacerbating COVID19 morbidity and mortality for population groups living in marginalizing circumstances. It is clear - even at this early stage of the pandemic - that inequitable social conditions lead to both more infections and worse outcomes. Expanding the definition of ‘most at risk’ to include social factors is critical to implementing equitable interventions and saving lives. Prioritizing populations with social conditions is necessary for more effective control of the epidemic in its next phase; and should become standard in the planning for, and prevention and mitigation of all health conditions. Reversing disparities and health inequities is only possible through an expansion of our ‘most-at-risk’ definition to also include social factors. Elsevier Inc. 2020-10 2020-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7831462/ /pubmed/32763263 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106229 Text en © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Commentary Afifi, Rima A. Novak, Nicole Gilbert, Paul A. Pauly, Bernadette Abdulrahim, Sawsan Rashid, Sabina Faiz Ortega, Fernando Ferrand, Rashida A. ‘Most at risk’ for COVID19? The imperative to expand the definition from biological to social factors for equity |
title | ‘Most at risk’ for COVID19? The imperative to expand the definition from biological to social factors for equity |
title_full | ‘Most at risk’ for COVID19? The imperative to expand the definition from biological to social factors for equity |
title_fullStr | ‘Most at risk’ for COVID19? The imperative to expand the definition from biological to social factors for equity |
title_full_unstemmed | ‘Most at risk’ for COVID19? The imperative to expand the definition from biological to social factors for equity |
title_short | ‘Most at risk’ for COVID19? The imperative to expand the definition from biological to social factors for equity |
title_sort | ‘most at risk’ for covid19? the imperative to expand the definition from biological to social factors for equity |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7831462/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32763263 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106229 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT afifirimaa mostatriskforcovid19theimperativetoexpandthedefinitionfrombiologicaltosocialfactorsforequity AT novaknicole mostatriskforcovid19theimperativetoexpandthedefinitionfrombiologicaltosocialfactorsforequity AT gilbertpaula mostatriskforcovid19theimperativetoexpandthedefinitionfrombiologicaltosocialfactorsforequity AT paulybernadette mostatriskforcovid19theimperativetoexpandthedefinitionfrombiologicaltosocialfactorsforequity AT abdulrahimsawsan mostatriskforcovid19theimperativetoexpandthedefinitionfrombiologicaltosocialfactorsforequity AT rashidsabinafaiz mostatriskforcovid19theimperativetoexpandthedefinitionfrombiologicaltosocialfactorsforequity AT ortegafernando mostatriskforcovid19theimperativetoexpandthedefinitionfrombiologicaltosocialfactorsforequity AT ferrandrashidaa mostatriskforcovid19theimperativetoexpandthedefinitionfrombiologicaltosocialfactorsforequity |