Cargando…
A simple tool for comparing benefits and ‘costs’ of COVID-19 exit strategies
BACKGROUND: Governments and health policymakers are now looking for strategies to lift the COVID-19 lockdown, while reducing risk to the public. METHODS: We propose the population attributable risk (PAR) as an established epidemiological tool that could support decision-making through quickly estima...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society for Public Health. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7831639/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33039678 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2020.08.025 |
_version_ | 1783641660568109056 |
---|---|
author | Frank, John Williams, Andrew J. |
author_facet | Frank, John Williams, Andrew J. |
author_sort | Frank, John |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Governments and health policymakers are now looking for strategies to lift the COVID-19 lockdown, while reducing risk to the public. METHODS: We propose the population attributable risk (PAR) as an established epidemiological tool that could support decision-making through quickly estimating the main benefits and costs of various exit strategies. RESULTS: We demonstrate the feasibility of use of PAR using pandemic data, that were publicly available in mid-May 2020 from Scotland and the US, to estimate the proportion of COVID-19 hospital admissions which might be avoided, and the proportion of adverse labour market effects – for various scenarios – based on maintaining the lockdown for those of certain ages with and without comorbidities. CONCLUSION: These calculations could be refined and applied in different countries to inform important COVID-19 policy decisions, using routinely collected data. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7831639 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | The Royal Society for Public Health. Published by Elsevier Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78316392021-01-26 A simple tool for comparing benefits and ‘costs’ of COVID-19 exit strategies Frank, John Williams, Andrew J. Public Health Original Research BACKGROUND: Governments and health policymakers are now looking for strategies to lift the COVID-19 lockdown, while reducing risk to the public. METHODS: We propose the population attributable risk (PAR) as an established epidemiological tool that could support decision-making through quickly estimating the main benefits and costs of various exit strategies. RESULTS: We demonstrate the feasibility of use of PAR using pandemic data, that were publicly available in mid-May 2020 from Scotland and the US, to estimate the proportion of COVID-19 hospital admissions which might be avoided, and the proportion of adverse labour market effects – for various scenarios – based on maintaining the lockdown for those of certain ages with and without comorbidities. CONCLUSION: These calculations could be refined and applied in different countries to inform important COVID-19 policy decisions, using routinely collected data. The Royal Society for Public Health. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2020-11 2020-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7831639/ /pubmed/33039678 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2020.08.025 Text en © 2020 The Royal Society for Public Health. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Frank, John Williams, Andrew J. A simple tool for comparing benefits and ‘costs’ of COVID-19 exit strategies |
title | A simple tool for comparing benefits and ‘costs’ of COVID-19 exit strategies |
title_full | A simple tool for comparing benefits and ‘costs’ of COVID-19 exit strategies |
title_fullStr | A simple tool for comparing benefits and ‘costs’ of COVID-19 exit strategies |
title_full_unstemmed | A simple tool for comparing benefits and ‘costs’ of COVID-19 exit strategies |
title_short | A simple tool for comparing benefits and ‘costs’ of COVID-19 exit strategies |
title_sort | simple tool for comparing benefits and ‘costs’ of covid-19 exit strategies |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7831639/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33039678 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2020.08.025 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT frankjohn asimpletoolforcomparingbenefitsandcostsofcovid19exitstrategies AT williamsandrewj asimpletoolforcomparingbenefitsandcostsofcovid19exitstrategies AT frankjohn simpletoolforcomparingbenefitsandcostsofcovid19exitstrategies AT williamsandrewj simpletoolforcomparingbenefitsandcostsofcovid19exitstrategies |