Cargando…

Improving native human sperm freezing protection by using a modified vitrification method

Slow freezing is the most commonly used technique for the cryopreservation of spermatozoa in clinical practice. However, it has been shown to have a negative impact on sperm function and structure. Vitrification as a successful alternative method has been proved to have better protective effects on...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhou, Dai, Wang, Xing-Ming, Li, Rui-Xue, Wang, Yi-Ze, Chao, Yuan-Chi, Liu, Zhi-Zhong, Huang, Zeng-Hui, Nie, Hong-Chuan, Zhu, Wen-Bing, Tan, Yue-Qiu, Fan, Li-Qing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7831840/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32567578
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aja.aja_29_20
_version_ 1783641704588378112
author Zhou, Dai
Wang, Xing-Ming
Li, Rui-Xue
Wang, Yi-Ze
Chao, Yuan-Chi
Liu, Zhi-Zhong
Huang, Zeng-Hui
Nie, Hong-Chuan
Zhu, Wen-Bing
Tan, Yue-Qiu
Fan, Li-Qing
author_facet Zhou, Dai
Wang, Xing-Ming
Li, Rui-Xue
Wang, Yi-Ze
Chao, Yuan-Chi
Liu, Zhi-Zhong
Huang, Zeng-Hui
Nie, Hong-Chuan
Zhu, Wen-Bing
Tan, Yue-Qiu
Fan, Li-Qing
author_sort Zhou, Dai
collection PubMed
description Slow freezing is the most commonly used technique for the cryopreservation of spermatozoa in clinical practice. However, it has been shown to have a negative impact on sperm function and structure. Vitrification as a successful alternative method has been proved to have better protective effects on human embryos, but vitrification of spermatozoa is still subject to low recovery rates. In this study, a modified vitrification method for native spermatozoa was developed. A total of 28 semen samples were included; each sample was divided into three equal parts and assigned to fresh, slow freezing, and vitrification groups. Sperm vitality, motility, morphology, DNA integrity, and acrosome reaction were assessed for each of the groups. The results showed that vitrification achieves better results for several sperm protection parameters than slow freezing; vitrification achieves a higher recovery rate (P < 0.05), motility (P < 0.05), morphology (P < 0.05), and curve line velocity (P < 0.05) than slow freezing. Furthermore, DNA fragmentation was decreased (P < 0.05) and better acrosome protection (P < 0.05) was exhibited in the spermatozoa after vitrification. Principal component analysis of all sperm parameters revealed that the vitrification cluster was closer to the fresh cluster, indicating that spermatozoa are better preserved through vitrification. In conclusion, while both slow freezing and vitrification have negative effects on sperm function and structure, the vitrification protocol described here had a relatively better recovery rate (65.8%) and showed improved preservation of several sperm quality parameters compared with slow freezing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7831840
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78318402021-02-01 Improving native human sperm freezing protection by using a modified vitrification method Zhou, Dai Wang, Xing-Ming Li, Rui-Xue Wang, Yi-Ze Chao, Yuan-Chi Liu, Zhi-Zhong Huang, Zeng-Hui Nie, Hong-Chuan Zhu, Wen-Bing Tan, Yue-Qiu Fan, Li-Qing Asian J Androl Original Article Slow freezing is the most commonly used technique for the cryopreservation of spermatozoa in clinical practice. However, it has been shown to have a negative impact on sperm function and structure. Vitrification as a successful alternative method has been proved to have better protective effects on human embryos, but vitrification of spermatozoa is still subject to low recovery rates. In this study, a modified vitrification method for native spermatozoa was developed. A total of 28 semen samples were included; each sample was divided into three equal parts and assigned to fresh, slow freezing, and vitrification groups. Sperm vitality, motility, morphology, DNA integrity, and acrosome reaction were assessed for each of the groups. The results showed that vitrification achieves better results for several sperm protection parameters than slow freezing; vitrification achieves a higher recovery rate (P < 0.05), motility (P < 0.05), morphology (P < 0.05), and curve line velocity (P < 0.05) than slow freezing. Furthermore, DNA fragmentation was decreased (P < 0.05) and better acrosome protection (P < 0.05) was exhibited in the spermatozoa after vitrification. Principal component analysis of all sperm parameters revealed that the vitrification cluster was closer to the fresh cluster, indicating that spermatozoa are better preserved through vitrification. In conclusion, while both slow freezing and vitrification have negative effects on sperm function and structure, the vitrification protocol described here had a relatively better recovery rate (65.8%) and showed improved preservation of several sperm quality parameters compared with slow freezing. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7831840/ /pubmed/32567578 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aja.aja_29_20 Text en Copyright: ©The Author(s)(2020) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Zhou, Dai
Wang, Xing-Ming
Li, Rui-Xue
Wang, Yi-Ze
Chao, Yuan-Chi
Liu, Zhi-Zhong
Huang, Zeng-Hui
Nie, Hong-Chuan
Zhu, Wen-Bing
Tan, Yue-Qiu
Fan, Li-Qing
Improving native human sperm freezing protection by using a modified vitrification method
title Improving native human sperm freezing protection by using a modified vitrification method
title_full Improving native human sperm freezing protection by using a modified vitrification method
title_fullStr Improving native human sperm freezing protection by using a modified vitrification method
title_full_unstemmed Improving native human sperm freezing protection by using a modified vitrification method
title_short Improving native human sperm freezing protection by using a modified vitrification method
title_sort improving native human sperm freezing protection by using a modified vitrification method
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7831840/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32567578
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aja.aja_29_20
work_keys_str_mv AT zhoudai improvingnativehumanspermfreezingprotectionbyusingamodifiedvitrificationmethod
AT wangxingming improvingnativehumanspermfreezingprotectionbyusingamodifiedvitrificationmethod
AT liruixue improvingnativehumanspermfreezingprotectionbyusingamodifiedvitrificationmethod
AT wangyize improvingnativehumanspermfreezingprotectionbyusingamodifiedvitrificationmethod
AT chaoyuanchi improvingnativehumanspermfreezingprotectionbyusingamodifiedvitrificationmethod
AT liuzhizhong improvingnativehumanspermfreezingprotectionbyusingamodifiedvitrificationmethod
AT huangzenghui improvingnativehumanspermfreezingprotectionbyusingamodifiedvitrificationmethod
AT niehongchuan improvingnativehumanspermfreezingprotectionbyusingamodifiedvitrificationmethod
AT zhuwenbing improvingnativehumanspermfreezingprotectionbyusingamodifiedvitrificationmethod
AT tanyueqiu improvingnativehumanspermfreezingprotectionbyusingamodifiedvitrificationmethod
AT fanliqing improvingnativehumanspermfreezingprotectionbyusingamodifiedvitrificationmethod