Cargando…

Minimizing contamination in the use of personal protective equipment: Simulation results through tracking contamination and enhanced protocols

BACKGROUND: Due to variations and the inadequate use of personal protective equipment (PPE), this study aimed to evaluate our enhanced PPE protocols for minimizing doffing contamination. METHODS: Among 3 PPE kits (simple, Level D, and Level C), 30 participants conducted the first simulation in their...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kang, JaHyun, Kim, Eun Jin, Choi, Jeong Hwa, Hong, Hae Kyung, Han, Si-Hyeon, Choi, In Soon, Kim, Jinhwa, Kim, Jae Yeun, Park, Eun Suk, Choe, Pyoeng Gyun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7832077/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33159995
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2020.11.002
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Due to variations and the inadequate use of personal protective equipment (PPE), this study aimed to evaluate our enhanced PPE protocols for minimizing doffing contamination. METHODS: Among 3 PPE kits (simple, Level D, and Level C), 30 participants conducted the first simulation in their adapted way and the second following enhanced protocols. After donning, participants performed a 1-minute simulation of direct care on a patient simulator covered with fluorescent powder. For tracking contamination routes between doffing processes, fluorescent powder contamination was examined with ultraviolet lamps in the darkened room. RESULTS: Participants were mostly registered nurses (N = 27, 90%), female (87%), and on average 31.7 years old with 8.5 years of clinical experience. Among 61 total simulations, 32 had at least 1 contamination (52.5%); “Noticeable” level (40%) at the “hands-fingers” and “shirt” body areas were most frequent. For first and second simulations with identical PPE kits, compared to the first with adapted practice, the second with enhanced protocols showed a significant reduction in doffing contamination rates (72.7% vs 22.7%, P = .0009 for both Level C and D; 77.8% vs 27.8%, P = .0027 for Level D). CONCLUSIONS: Our enhanced protocols could significantly reduce contaminations. More studies are necessary to provide safer PPE protocol options.