Cargando…

MM-250: Impact of Prolonged Dose Delays on Response with Belantamab Mafodotin (Belamaf; GSK2857916) Treatment in the DREAMM-2 Study: 13-Month Follow-Up

CONTEXT: Single-agent belamaf demonstrated deep and durable responses in the DREAMM-2 (NCT03525678) primary analysis (1) and long-term follow-up (2,3). Keratopathy (microcyst-like epithelial changes [MECs] observed on eye examination with/without symptoms) were managed through dose delays and reduct...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cohen, Adam D, Lee, Hans C, Trudel, Suzanne, Abdallah, Al-Ola, Callander, Natalie, Libby, Edward, Karlin, Lionel, Lonial, Sagar, Womersley, Lynsey, Baron, January, Lewis, Eric, Nungesser, Katlyn, Gupta, Ira, Opalinska, Joanna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7832238/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2152-2650(20)30949-6
_version_ 1783641792146571264
author Cohen, Adam D
Lee, Hans C
Trudel, Suzanne
Abdallah, Al-Ola
Callander, Natalie
Libby, Edward
Karlin, Lionel
Lonial, Sagar
Womersley, Lynsey
Baron, January
Lewis, Eric
Nungesser, Katlyn
Gupta, Ira
Opalinska, Joanna
author_facet Cohen, Adam D
Lee, Hans C
Trudel, Suzanne
Abdallah, Al-Ola
Callander, Natalie
Libby, Edward
Karlin, Lionel
Lonial, Sagar
Womersley, Lynsey
Baron, January
Lewis, Eric
Nungesser, Katlyn
Gupta, Ira
Opalinska, Joanna
author_sort Cohen, Adam D
collection PubMed
description CONTEXT: Single-agent belamaf demonstrated deep and durable responses in the DREAMM-2 (NCT03525678) primary analysis (1) and long-term follow-up (2,3). Keratopathy (microcyst-like epithelial changes [MECs] observed on eye examination with/without symptoms) were managed through dose delays and reductions. OBJECTIVE: To provide an update on the impact of dose delays on responses in patients receiving single-agent belamaf 2.5-mg/kg in DREAMM-2 (13-month follow-up). METHODS: In the DREAMM-2 study (single-agent belamaf 2.5 mg/kg [n=97] or 3.4 mg/kg [n=99] Q3W), dose modifications were permitted to manage adverse events (AEs), including keratopathy (MECs), an eye examination finding that may/may not be associated with symptoms. Objective response (IMWG criteria 2016) was assessed by an independent review committee Q3W, regardless of treatment delays. Here, we report a post-hoc analysis on the impact of dose delays >63 days on clinical response in the 2.5-mg/kg arm (the selected dose for future clinical development based on risk–benefit assessment). RESULTS: In patients receiving single-agent belamaf (2.5 mg/kg), dose delays (54%) and reductions (35%) due to AEs were common (2,3). Keratopathy (MECs) was the most frequent reason for dose delays (47%) and reductions (25%), leading to only 1 patient (1%) discontinuing treatment (2,3). Of 31 patients with ≥partial response, 16 had prolonged treatment interruptions (>63 days). Of these 16 patients, 14 (88%) continued experiencing a clinical benefit during the first prolonged delay: 6 (38%) deepened their response during delay (1 SD to MR; 2 PR to VGPR; 2 MR to VGPR; 1 VGPR to CR); 6 (38%) maintained the same response category as that of the last evaluable assessment during delay/first evaluable assessment after delay; 2 (13%) had increasing paraproteins during the delay but did not meet progression criteria. Two (13%) developed disease progression (1 patient 6 weeks into delay; 1 patient 3 weeks after delay). CONCLUSIONS: Despite dose delays lasting for several cycles to manage AEs, most responses were sustained throughout the delay, thus maintaining clinical benefit for the majority of patients. FUNDING: GlaxoSmithKline (205678). Drug linker technology licensed from Seattle Genetics; monoclonal antibody produced using POTELLIGENT Technology licensed from BioWa. REFERENCES: [1] Lonial Lancet Oncol 2020. [2] Lonial ASCO 2020, EP436. [3] Lonial EHA 2020, EP970.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7832238
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78322382021-01-26 MM-250: Impact of Prolonged Dose Delays on Response with Belantamab Mafodotin (Belamaf; GSK2857916) Treatment in the DREAMM-2 Study: 13-Month Follow-Up Cohen, Adam D Lee, Hans C Trudel, Suzanne Abdallah, Al-Ola Callander, Natalie Libby, Edward Karlin, Lionel Lonial, Sagar Womersley, Lynsey Baron, January Lewis, Eric Nungesser, Katlyn Gupta, Ira Opalinska, Joanna Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk Submitted Abstracts CONTEXT: Single-agent belamaf demonstrated deep and durable responses in the DREAMM-2 (NCT03525678) primary analysis (1) and long-term follow-up (2,3). Keratopathy (microcyst-like epithelial changes [MECs] observed on eye examination with/without symptoms) were managed through dose delays and reductions. OBJECTIVE: To provide an update on the impact of dose delays on responses in patients receiving single-agent belamaf 2.5-mg/kg in DREAMM-2 (13-month follow-up). METHODS: In the DREAMM-2 study (single-agent belamaf 2.5 mg/kg [n=97] or 3.4 mg/kg [n=99] Q3W), dose modifications were permitted to manage adverse events (AEs), including keratopathy (MECs), an eye examination finding that may/may not be associated with symptoms. Objective response (IMWG criteria 2016) was assessed by an independent review committee Q3W, regardless of treatment delays. Here, we report a post-hoc analysis on the impact of dose delays >63 days on clinical response in the 2.5-mg/kg arm (the selected dose for future clinical development based on risk–benefit assessment). RESULTS: In patients receiving single-agent belamaf (2.5 mg/kg), dose delays (54%) and reductions (35%) due to AEs were common (2,3). Keratopathy (MECs) was the most frequent reason for dose delays (47%) and reductions (25%), leading to only 1 patient (1%) discontinuing treatment (2,3). Of 31 patients with ≥partial response, 16 had prolonged treatment interruptions (>63 days). Of these 16 patients, 14 (88%) continued experiencing a clinical benefit during the first prolonged delay: 6 (38%) deepened their response during delay (1 SD to MR; 2 PR to VGPR; 2 MR to VGPR; 1 VGPR to CR); 6 (38%) maintained the same response category as that of the last evaluable assessment during delay/first evaluable assessment after delay; 2 (13%) had increasing paraproteins during the delay but did not meet progression criteria. Two (13%) developed disease progression (1 patient 6 weeks into delay; 1 patient 3 weeks after delay). CONCLUSIONS: Despite dose delays lasting for several cycles to manage AEs, most responses were sustained throughout the delay, thus maintaining clinical benefit for the majority of patients. FUNDING: GlaxoSmithKline (205678). Drug linker technology licensed from Seattle Genetics; monoclonal antibody produced using POTELLIGENT Technology licensed from BioWa. REFERENCES: [1] Lonial Lancet Oncol 2020. [2] Lonial ASCO 2020, EP436. [3] Lonial EHA 2020, EP970. Elsevier Inc. 2020-09 2020-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7832238/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2152-2650(20)30949-6 Text en Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Submitted Abstracts
Cohen, Adam D
Lee, Hans C
Trudel, Suzanne
Abdallah, Al-Ola
Callander, Natalie
Libby, Edward
Karlin, Lionel
Lonial, Sagar
Womersley, Lynsey
Baron, January
Lewis, Eric
Nungesser, Katlyn
Gupta, Ira
Opalinska, Joanna
MM-250: Impact of Prolonged Dose Delays on Response with Belantamab Mafodotin (Belamaf; GSK2857916) Treatment in the DREAMM-2 Study: 13-Month Follow-Up
title MM-250: Impact of Prolonged Dose Delays on Response with Belantamab Mafodotin (Belamaf; GSK2857916) Treatment in the DREAMM-2 Study: 13-Month Follow-Up
title_full MM-250: Impact of Prolonged Dose Delays on Response with Belantamab Mafodotin (Belamaf; GSK2857916) Treatment in the DREAMM-2 Study: 13-Month Follow-Up
title_fullStr MM-250: Impact of Prolonged Dose Delays on Response with Belantamab Mafodotin (Belamaf; GSK2857916) Treatment in the DREAMM-2 Study: 13-Month Follow-Up
title_full_unstemmed MM-250: Impact of Prolonged Dose Delays on Response with Belantamab Mafodotin (Belamaf; GSK2857916) Treatment in the DREAMM-2 Study: 13-Month Follow-Up
title_short MM-250: Impact of Prolonged Dose Delays on Response with Belantamab Mafodotin (Belamaf; GSK2857916) Treatment in the DREAMM-2 Study: 13-Month Follow-Up
title_sort mm-250: impact of prolonged dose delays on response with belantamab mafodotin (belamaf; gsk2857916) treatment in the dreamm-2 study: 13-month follow-up
topic Submitted Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7832238/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2152-2650(20)30949-6
work_keys_str_mv AT cohenadamd mm250impactofprolongeddosedelaysonresponsewithbelantamabmafodotinbelamafgsk2857916treatmentinthedreamm2study13monthfollowup
AT leehansc mm250impactofprolongeddosedelaysonresponsewithbelantamabmafodotinbelamafgsk2857916treatmentinthedreamm2study13monthfollowup
AT trudelsuzanne mm250impactofprolongeddosedelaysonresponsewithbelantamabmafodotinbelamafgsk2857916treatmentinthedreamm2study13monthfollowup
AT abdallahalola mm250impactofprolongeddosedelaysonresponsewithbelantamabmafodotinbelamafgsk2857916treatmentinthedreamm2study13monthfollowup
AT callandernatalie mm250impactofprolongeddosedelaysonresponsewithbelantamabmafodotinbelamafgsk2857916treatmentinthedreamm2study13monthfollowup
AT libbyedward mm250impactofprolongeddosedelaysonresponsewithbelantamabmafodotinbelamafgsk2857916treatmentinthedreamm2study13monthfollowup
AT karlinlionel mm250impactofprolongeddosedelaysonresponsewithbelantamabmafodotinbelamafgsk2857916treatmentinthedreamm2study13monthfollowup
AT lonialsagar mm250impactofprolongeddosedelaysonresponsewithbelantamabmafodotinbelamafgsk2857916treatmentinthedreamm2study13monthfollowup
AT womersleylynsey mm250impactofprolongeddosedelaysonresponsewithbelantamabmafodotinbelamafgsk2857916treatmentinthedreamm2study13monthfollowup
AT baronjanuary mm250impactofprolongeddosedelaysonresponsewithbelantamabmafodotinbelamafgsk2857916treatmentinthedreamm2study13monthfollowup
AT lewiseric mm250impactofprolongeddosedelaysonresponsewithbelantamabmafodotinbelamafgsk2857916treatmentinthedreamm2study13monthfollowup
AT nungesserkatlyn mm250impactofprolongeddosedelaysonresponsewithbelantamabmafodotinbelamafgsk2857916treatmentinthedreamm2study13monthfollowup
AT guptaira mm250impactofprolongeddosedelaysonresponsewithbelantamabmafodotinbelamafgsk2857916treatmentinthedreamm2study13monthfollowup
AT opalinskajoanna mm250impactofprolongeddosedelaysonresponsewithbelantamabmafodotinbelamafgsk2857916treatmentinthedreamm2study13monthfollowup