Cargando…
Comparison of some forecasting methods for COVID-19
In this paper, we use forecasting methods such as Euler’s iterative method and cubic spline interpolation to predict the total number of people infected and the number of active cases for COVID-19 propagation. We construct a novel iterative method, which is based on cubic spline interpolation and Eu...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Faculty of Engineering, Alexandria University.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7832450/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2020.11.011 |
_version_ | 1783641839555837952 |
---|---|
author | Appadu, A.R. Kelil, A.S. Tijani, Y.O. |
author_facet | Appadu, A.R. Kelil, A.S. Tijani, Y.O. |
author_sort | Appadu, A.R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | In this paper, we use forecasting methods such as Euler’s iterative method and cubic spline interpolation to predict the total number of people infected and the number of active cases for COVID-19 propagation. We construct a novel iterative method, which is based on cubic spline interpolation and Euler’s method and it is an improvement over the two latter methods. The novel method is very efficient for forecasting and to describe the underlying dynamics of the pandemic. Our predicted results are also compared with an iterative method developed by Perc et al. (2020) [1]. Our study encompasses the following countries namely; South Korea, India, South Africa, Germany, and Italy. We use data from 15 February 2020 to 31 May 2020 in order to obtain graphs and then obtain predicted values as from 01 June 2020. We use two criteria to classify whether the predicted value for a certain day is effective or not. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7832450 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Faculty of Engineering, Alexandria University. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78324502021-01-26 Comparison of some forecasting methods for COVID-19 Appadu, A.R. Kelil, A.S. Tijani, Y.O. Alexandria Engineering Journal Article In this paper, we use forecasting methods such as Euler’s iterative method and cubic spline interpolation to predict the total number of people infected and the number of active cases for COVID-19 propagation. We construct a novel iterative method, which is based on cubic spline interpolation and Euler’s method and it is an improvement over the two latter methods. The novel method is very efficient for forecasting and to describe the underlying dynamics of the pandemic. Our predicted results are also compared with an iterative method developed by Perc et al. (2020) [1]. Our study encompasses the following countries namely; South Korea, India, South Africa, Germany, and Italy. We use data from 15 February 2020 to 31 May 2020 in order to obtain graphs and then obtain predicted values as from 01 June 2020. We use two criteria to classify whether the predicted value for a certain day is effective or not. The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Faculty of Engineering, Alexandria University. 2021-02 2020-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7832450/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2020.11.011 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Faculty of Engineering, Alexandria University. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Appadu, A.R. Kelil, A.S. Tijani, Y.O. Comparison of some forecasting methods for COVID-19 |
title | Comparison of some forecasting methods for COVID-19 |
title_full | Comparison of some forecasting methods for COVID-19 |
title_fullStr | Comparison of some forecasting methods for COVID-19 |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of some forecasting methods for COVID-19 |
title_short | Comparison of some forecasting methods for COVID-19 |
title_sort | comparison of some forecasting methods for covid-19 |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7832450/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2020.11.011 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT appaduar comparisonofsomeforecastingmethodsforcovid19 AT kelilas comparisonofsomeforecastingmethodsforcovid19 AT tijaniyo comparisonofsomeforecastingmethodsforcovid19 |