Cargando…

The potential public health and economic value of a hypothetical COVID-19 vaccine in the United States: Use of cost-effectiveness modeling to inform vaccination prioritization

BACKGROUND: Researchers are working at unprecedented speed to develop a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. We aimed to assess the value of a hypothetical vaccine and its potential public health impact when prioritization is required due to supply constraints. METHODS: A Markov cohort model was used to estimate COV...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kohli, Michele, Maschio, Michael, Becker, Debbie, Weinstein, Milton C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7832653/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33483216
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.12.078
_version_ 1783641884492562432
author Kohli, Michele
Maschio, Michael
Becker, Debbie
Weinstein, Milton C.
author_facet Kohli, Michele
Maschio, Michael
Becker, Debbie
Weinstein, Milton C.
author_sort Kohli, Michele
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Researchers are working at unprecedented speed to develop a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. We aimed to assess the value of a hypothetical vaccine and its potential public health impact when prioritization is required due to supply constraints. METHODS: A Markov cohort model was used to estimate COVID-19 related direct medical costs and deaths in the United States (US), with and without implementation of a 60% efficacious vaccine. To prioritize the vaccine under constrained supply, the population was divided into tiers based on age; risk and age; and occupation and age; and outcomes were compared across one year under various supply assumptions. The incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained versus no vaccine was calculated for the entire adult population and for each tier in the three prioritization schemes. RESULTS: The incremental cost per QALY gained for the US adult population was $8,200 versus no vaccination. For the tiers at highest risk of complications from COVID-19, such as those ages 65 years and older, vaccination was cost-saving compared to no vaccination. The cost per QALY gained increased to over $94,000 for those with a low risk of hospitalization and death following infection. Results were most sensitive to infection incidence, vaccine price, the cost of treating COVID-19, and vaccine efficacy. Under the most optimistic supply scenario, the hypothetical vaccine may prevent 31% of expected deaths. As supply becomes more constrained, only 23% of deaths may be prevented. In lower supply scenarios, prioritization becomes more important to maximize the number of deaths prevented. CONCLUSIONS: A COVID-19 vaccine is predicted to be good value for money (cost per QALY gained <$50,000). The speed at which an effective vaccine can be made available will determine how much morbidity and mortality may be prevented in the US.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7832653
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78326532021-01-26 The potential public health and economic value of a hypothetical COVID-19 vaccine in the United States: Use of cost-effectiveness modeling to inform vaccination prioritization Kohli, Michele Maschio, Michael Becker, Debbie Weinstein, Milton C. Vaccine Article BACKGROUND: Researchers are working at unprecedented speed to develop a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. We aimed to assess the value of a hypothetical vaccine and its potential public health impact when prioritization is required due to supply constraints. METHODS: A Markov cohort model was used to estimate COVID-19 related direct medical costs and deaths in the United States (US), with and without implementation of a 60% efficacious vaccine. To prioritize the vaccine under constrained supply, the population was divided into tiers based on age; risk and age; and occupation and age; and outcomes were compared across one year under various supply assumptions. The incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained versus no vaccine was calculated for the entire adult population and for each tier in the three prioritization schemes. RESULTS: The incremental cost per QALY gained for the US adult population was $8,200 versus no vaccination. For the tiers at highest risk of complications from COVID-19, such as those ages 65 years and older, vaccination was cost-saving compared to no vaccination. The cost per QALY gained increased to over $94,000 for those with a low risk of hospitalization and death following infection. Results were most sensitive to infection incidence, vaccine price, the cost of treating COVID-19, and vaccine efficacy. Under the most optimistic supply scenario, the hypothetical vaccine may prevent 31% of expected deaths. As supply becomes more constrained, only 23% of deaths may be prevented. In lower supply scenarios, prioritization becomes more important to maximize the number of deaths prevented. CONCLUSIONS: A COVID-19 vaccine is predicted to be good value for money (cost per QALY gained <$50,000). The speed at which an effective vaccine can be made available will determine how much morbidity and mortality may be prevented in the US. The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2021-02-12 2021-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7832653/ /pubmed/33483216 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.12.078 Text en © 2021 The Authors Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Kohli, Michele
Maschio, Michael
Becker, Debbie
Weinstein, Milton C.
The potential public health and economic value of a hypothetical COVID-19 vaccine in the United States: Use of cost-effectiveness modeling to inform vaccination prioritization
title The potential public health and economic value of a hypothetical COVID-19 vaccine in the United States: Use of cost-effectiveness modeling to inform vaccination prioritization
title_full The potential public health and economic value of a hypothetical COVID-19 vaccine in the United States: Use of cost-effectiveness modeling to inform vaccination prioritization
title_fullStr The potential public health and economic value of a hypothetical COVID-19 vaccine in the United States: Use of cost-effectiveness modeling to inform vaccination prioritization
title_full_unstemmed The potential public health and economic value of a hypothetical COVID-19 vaccine in the United States: Use of cost-effectiveness modeling to inform vaccination prioritization
title_short The potential public health and economic value of a hypothetical COVID-19 vaccine in the United States: Use of cost-effectiveness modeling to inform vaccination prioritization
title_sort potential public health and economic value of a hypothetical covid-19 vaccine in the united states: use of cost-effectiveness modeling to inform vaccination prioritization
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7832653/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33483216
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.12.078
work_keys_str_mv AT kohlimichele thepotentialpublichealthandeconomicvalueofahypotheticalcovid19vaccineintheunitedstatesuseofcosteffectivenessmodelingtoinformvaccinationprioritization
AT maschiomichael thepotentialpublichealthandeconomicvalueofahypotheticalcovid19vaccineintheunitedstatesuseofcosteffectivenessmodelingtoinformvaccinationprioritization
AT beckerdebbie thepotentialpublichealthandeconomicvalueofahypotheticalcovid19vaccineintheunitedstatesuseofcosteffectivenessmodelingtoinformvaccinationprioritization
AT weinsteinmiltonc thepotentialpublichealthandeconomicvalueofahypotheticalcovid19vaccineintheunitedstatesuseofcosteffectivenessmodelingtoinformvaccinationprioritization
AT kohlimichele potentialpublichealthandeconomicvalueofahypotheticalcovid19vaccineintheunitedstatesuseofcosteffectivenessmodelingtoinformvaccinationprioritization
AT maschiomichael potentialpublichealthandeconomicvalueofahypotheticalcovid19vaccineintheunitedstatesuseofcosteffectivenessmodelingtoinformvaccinationprioritization
AT beckerdebbie potentialpublichealthandeconomicvalueofahypotheticalcovid19vaccineintheunitedstatesuseofcosteffectivenessmodelingtoinformvaccinationprioritization
AT weinsteinmiltonc potentialpublichealthandeconomicvalueofahypotheticalcovid19vaccineintheunitedstatesuseofcosteffectivenessmodelingtoinformvaccinationprioritization