Cargando…
The Risk of Spread of Infection During Craniotomy/Craniostomy on Patients with Active Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Infection: Myth or Fact?
OBJECTIVES: Craniotomies/craniostomies have been categorized as aerosol-generating procedures and are presumed to spread coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, the presence of severe acute respiratory distress syndrome coronavirus 2 virus in the generated bone dust has never been proved. Our...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7832802/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33326859 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2020.12.040 |
_version_ | 1783641916505587712 |
---|---|
author | Singh, Apinderpreet Salunke, Pravin Chhabra, Rajesh Sethi, Sunil Sahoo, Sushanta K. Karthigeyan, Madhivanan Gendle, Chandrasekhar Kumar, Rakesh Gupta, Sunil |
author_facet | Singh, Apinderpreet Salunke, Pravin Chhabra, Rajesh Sethi, Sunil Sahoo, Sushanta K. Karthigeyan, Madhivanan Gendle, Chandrasekhar Kumar, Rakesh Gupta, Sunil |
author_sort | Singh, Apinderpreet |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Craniotomies/craniostomies have been categorized as aerosol-generating procedures and are presumed to spread coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, the presence of severe acute respiratory distress syndrome coronavirus 2 virus in the generated bone dust has never been proved. Our objective is to evaluate the presence of virus in the bone dust (aerosol) generated during emergency neurosurgical procedures performed on patients with active COVID-19. This would determine the true risk of disease transmission during the surgery. METHODS: Ten patients with active COVID-19 infection admitted to our institute in 1 month required emergency craniotomy/craniostomy. The bone dust and mucosal scrapings form paranasal sinuses (if opened) collected during these procedures were tested for the virus using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. The entire surgical team was observed for any symptoms related to COVID-19 for 14 days following surgery. RESULTS: Nine patients had moderate viral load in their nasopharyngeal cavity, as detected on reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. None of the samples of bone dust from these 10 patients tested positive. Mucosal scrapping obtained in 1 patient in which mastoid air cells were inadvertently opened tested negative as well. No health workers from the operating room developed COVID-19–related symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: The bone dust generated during craniotomy/stomy of active patients does not contain the virus. The procedure on an active patient is unlikely to spread the disease. However, a study with larger cohort would be confirmatory. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7832802 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78328022021-01-26 The Risk of Spread of Infection During Craniotomy/Craniostomy on Patients with Active Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Infection: Myth or Fact? Singh, Apinderpreet Salunke, Pravin Chhabra, Rajesh Sethi, Sunil Sahoo, Sushanta K. Karthigeyan, Madhivanan Gendle, Chandrasekhar Kumar, Rakesh Gupta, Sunil World Neurosurg Original Article OBJECTIVES: Craniotomies/craniostomies have been categorized as aerosol-generating procedures and are presumed to spread coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, the presence of severe acute respiratory distress syndrome coronavirus 2 virus in the generated bone dust has never been proved. Our objective is to evaluate the presence of virus in the bone dust (aerosol) generated during emergency neurosurgical procedures performed on patients with active COVID-19. This would determine the true risk of disease transmission during the surgery. METHODS: Ten patients with active COVID-19 infection admitted to our institute in 1 month required emergency craniotomy/craniostomy. The bone dust and mucosal scrapings form paranasal sinuses (if opened) collected during these procedures were tested for the virus using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. The entire surgical team was observed for any symptoms related to COVID-19 for 14 days following surgery. RESULTS: Nine patients had moderate viral load in their nasopharyngeal cavity, as detected on reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. None of the samples of bone dust from these 10 patients tested positive. Mucosal scrapping obtained in 1 patient in which mastoid air cells were inadvertently opened tested negative as well. No health workers from the operating room developed COVID-19–related symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: The bone dust generated during craniotomy/stomy of active patients does not contain the virus. The procedure on an active patient is unlikely to spread the disease. However, a study with larger cohort would be confirmatory. Elsevier Inc. 2021-03 2020-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7832802/ /pubmed/33326859 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2020.12.040 Text en © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Singh, Apinderpreet Salunke, Pravin Chhabra, Rajesh Sethi, Sunil Sahoo, Sushanta K. Karthigeyan, Madhivanan Gendle, Chandrasekhar Kumar, Rakesh Gupta, Sunil The Risk of Spread of Infection During Craniotomy/Craniostomy on Patients with Active Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Infection: Myth or Fact? |
title | The Risk of Spread of Infection During Craniotomy/Craniostomy on Patients with Active Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Infection: Myth or Fact? |
title_full | The Risk of Spread of Infection During Craniotomy/Craniostomy on Patients with Active Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Infection: Myth or Fact? |
title_fullStr | The Risk of Spread of Infection During Craniotomy/Craniostomy on Patients with Active Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Infection: Myth or Fact? |
title_full_unstemmed | The Risk of Spread of Infection During Craniotomy/Craniostomy on Patients with Active Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Infection: Myth or Fact? |
title_short | The Risk of Spread of Infection During Craniotomy/Craniostomy on Patients with Active Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Infection: Myth or Fact? |
title_sort | risk of spread of infection during craniotomy/craniostomy on patients with active coronavirus disease 2019 (covid-19) infection: myth or fact? |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7832802/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33326859 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2020.12.040 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT singhapinderpreet theriskofspreadofinfectionduringcraniotomycraniostomyonpatientswithactivecoronavirusdisease2019covid19infectionmythorfact AT salunkepravin theriskofspreadofinfectionduringcraniotomycraniostomyonpatientswithactivecoronavirusdisease2019covid19infectionmythorfact AT chhabrarajesh theriskofspreadofinfectionduringcraniotomycraniostomyonpatientswithactivecoronavirusdisease2019covid19infectionmythorfact AT sethisunil theriskofspreadofinfectionduringcraniotomycraniostomyonpatientswithactivecoronavirusdisease2019covid19infectionmythorfact AT sahoosushantak theriskofspreadofinfectionduringcraniotomycraniostomyonpatientswithactivecoronavirusdisease2019covid19infectionmythorfact AT karthigeyanmadhivanan theriskofspreadofinfectionduringcraniotomycraniostomyonpatientswithactivecoronavirusdisease2019covid19infectionmythorfact AT gendlechandrasekhar theriskofspreadofinfectionduringcraniotomycraniostomyonpatientswithactivecoronavirusdisease2019covid19infectionmythorfact AT kumarrakesh theriskofspreadofinfectionduringcraniotomycraniostomyonpatientswithactivecoronavirusdisease2019covid19infectionmythorfact AT guptasunil theriskofspreadofinfectionduringcraniotomycraniostomyonpatientswithactivecoronavirusdisease2019covid19infectionmythorfact AT singhapinderpreet riskofspreadofinfectionduringcraniotomycraniostomyonpatientswithactivecoronavirusdisease2019covid19infectionmythorfact AT salunkepravin riskofspreadofinfectionduringcraniotomycraniostomyonpatientswithactivecoronavirusdisease2019covid19infectionmythorfact AT chhabrarajesh riskofspreadofinfectionduringcraniotomycraniostomyonpatientswithactivecoronavirusdisease2019covid19infectionmythorfact AT sethisunil riskofspreadofinfectionduringcraniotomycraniostomyonpatientswithactivecoronavirusdisease2019covid19infectionmythorfact AT sahoosushantak riskofspreadofinfectionduringcraniotomycraniostomyonpatientswithactivecoronavirusdisease2019covid19infectionmythorfact AT karthigeyanmadhivanan riskofspreadofinfectionduringcraniotomycraniostomyonpatientswithactivecoronavirusdisease2019covid19infectionmythorfact AT gendlechandrasekhar riskofspreadofinfectionduringcraniotomycraniostomyonpatientswithactivecoronavirusdisease2019covid19infectionmythorfact AT kumarrakesh riskofspreadofinfectionduringcraniotomycraniostomyonpatientswithactivecoronavirusdisease2019covid19infectionmythorfact AT guptasunil riskofspreadofinfectionduringcraniotomycraniostomyonpatientswithactivecoronavirusdisease2019covid19infectionmythorfact |