Cargando…

The Impact of Lipid Handling and Phase Distribution on the Acoustic Behavior of Microbubbles

Phospholipid-coated microbubbles are ultrasound contrast agents that can be employed for ultrasound molecular imaging and drug delivery. For safe and effective implementation, microbubbles must respond uniformly and predictably to ultrasound. Therefore, we investigated how lipid handling and phase d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Langeveld, Simone A.G., Beekers, Inés, Collado-Lara, Gonzalo, van der Steen, Antonius F. W., de Jong, Nico, Kooiman, Klazina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7832861/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33477843
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics13010119
_version_ 1783641929474375680
author Langeveld, Simone A.G.
Beekers, Inés
Collado-Lara, Gonzalo
van der Steen, Antonius F. W.
de Jong, Nico
Kooiman, Klazina
author_facet Langeveld, Simone A.G.
Beekers, Inés
Collado-Lara, Gonzalo
van der Steen, Antonius F. W.
de Jong, Nico
Kooiman, Klazina
author_sort Langeveld, Simone A.G.
collection PubMed
description Phospholipid-coated microbubbles are ultrasound contrast agents that can be employed for ultrasound molecular imaging and drug delivery. For safe and effective implementation, microbubbles must respond uniformly and predictably to ultrasound. Therefore, we investigated how lipid handling and phase distribution affected the variability in the acoustic behavior of microbubbles. Cholesterol was used to modify the lateral molecular packing of 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DSPC)-based microbubbles. To assess the effect of lipid handling, microbubbles were produced by a direct method, i.e., lipids directly dispersed in an aqueous medium or indirect method, i.e., lipids first dissolved in an organic solvent. The lipid phase and ligand distribution in the microbubble coating were investigated using confocal microscopy, and the acoustic response was recorded with the Brandaris 128 ultra-high-speed camera. In microbubbles with 12 mol% cholesterol, the lipids were miscible and all in the same phase, which resulted in more buckle formation, lower shell elasticity and higher shell viscosity. Indirect DSPC microbubbles had a more uniform response to ultrasound than direct DSPC and indirect DSPC-cholesterol microbubbles. The difference in lipid handling between direct and indirect DSPC microbubbles significantly affected the acoustic behavior. Indirect DSPC microbubbles are the most promising candidate for ultrasound molecular imaging and drug delivery applications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7832861
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78328612021-01-26 The Impact of Lipid Handling and Phase Distribution on the Acoustic Behavior of Microbubbles Langeveld, Simone A.G. Beekers, Inés Collado-Lara, Gonzalo van der Steen, Antonius F. W. de Jong, Nico Kooiman, Klazina Pharmaceutics Article Phospholipid-coated microbubbles are ultrasound contrast agents that can be employed for ultrasound molecular imaging and drug delivery. For safe and effective implementation, microbubbles must respond uniformly and predictably to ultrasound. Therefore, we investigated how lipid handling and phase distribution affected the variability in the acoustic behavior of microbubbles. Cholesterol was used to modify the lateral molecular packing of 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DSPC)-based microbubbles. To assess the effect of lipid handling, microbubbles were produced by a direct method, i.e., lipids directly dispersed in an aqueous medium or indirect method, i.e., lipids first dissolved in an organic solvent. The lipid phase and ligand distribution in the microbubble coating were investigated using confocal microscopy, and the acoustic response was recorded with the Brandaris 128 ultra-high-speed camera. In microbubbles with 12 mol% cholesterol, the lipids were miscible and all in the same phase, which resulted in more buckle formation, lower shell elasticity and higher shell viscosity. Indirect DSPC microbubbles had a more uniform response to ultrasound than direct DSPC and indirect DSPC-cholesterol microbubbles. The difference in lipid handling between direct and indirect DSPC microbubbles significantly affected the acoustic behavior. Indirect DSPC microbubbles are the most promising candidate for ultrasound molecular imaging and drug delivery applications. MDPI 2021-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7832861/ /pubmed/33477843 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics13010119 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Langeveld, Simone A.G.
Beekers, Inés
Collado-Lara, Gonzalo
van der Steen, Antonius F. W.
de Jong, Nico
Kooiman, Klazina
The Impact of Lipid Handling and Phase Distribution on the Acoustic Behavior of Microbubbles
title The Impact of Lipid Handling and Phase Distribution on the Acoustic Behavior of Microbubbles
title_full The Impact of Lipid Handling and Phase Distribution on the Acoustic Behavior of Microbubbles
title_fullStr The Impact of Lipid Handling and Phase Distribution on the Acoustic Behavior of Microbubbles
title_full_unstemmed The Impact of Lipid Handling and Phase Distribution on the Acoustic Behavior of Microbubbles
title_short The Impact of Lipid Handling and Phase Distribution on the Acoustic Behavior of Microbubbles
title_sort impact of lipid handling and phase distribution on the acoustic behavior of microbubbles
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7832861/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33477843
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics13010119
work_keys_str_mv AT langeveldsimoneag theimpactoflipidhandlingandphasedistributionontheacousticbehaviorofmicrobubbles
AT beekersines theimpactoflipidhandlingandphasedistributionontheacousticbehaviorofmicrobubbles
AT colladolaragonzalo theimpactoflipidhandlingandphasedistributionontheacousticbehaviorofmicrobubbles
AT vandersteenantoniusfw theimpactoflipidhandlingandphasedistributionontheacousticbehaviorofmicrobubbles
AT dejongnico theimpactoflipidhandlingandphasedistributionontheacousticbehaviorofmicrobubbles
AT kooimanklazina theimpactoflipidhandlingandphasedistributionontheacousticbehaviorofmicrobubbles
AT langeveldsimoneag impactoflipidhandlingandphasedistributionontheacousticbehaviorofmicrobubbles
AT beekersines impactoflipidhandlingandphasedistributionontheacousticbehaviorofmicrobubbles
AT colladolaragonzalo impactoflipidhandlingandphasedistributionontheacousticbehaviorofmicrobubbles
AT vandersteenantoniusfw impactoflipidhandlingandphasedistributionontheacousticbehaviorofmicrobubbles
AT dejongnico impactoflipidhandlingandphasedistributionontheacousticbehaviorofmicrobubbles
AT kooimanklazina impactoflipidhandlingandphasedistributionontheacousticbehaviorofmicrobubbles