Cargando…
The Impact of Lipid Handling and Phase Distribution on the Acoustic Behavior of Microbubbles
Phospholipid-coated microbubbles are ultrasound contrast agents that can be employed for ultrasound molecular imaging and drug delivery. For safe and effective implementation, microbubbles must respond uniformly and predictably to ultrasound. Therefore, we investigated how lipid handling and phase d...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7832861/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33477843 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics13010119 |
_version_ | 1783641929474375680 |
---|---|
author | Langeveld, Simone A.G. Beekers, Inés Collado-Lara, Gonzalo van der Steen, Antonius F. W. de Jong, Nico Kooiman, Klazina |
author_facet | Langeveld, Simone A.G. Beekers, Inés Collado-Lara, Gonzalo van der Steen, Antonius F. W. de Jong, Nico Kooiman, Klazina |
author_sort | Langeveld, Simone A.G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Phospholipid-coated microbubbles are ultrasound contrast agents that can be employed for ultrasound molecular imaging and drug delivery. For safe and effective implementation, microbubbles must respond uniformly and predictably to ultrasound. Therefore, we investigated how lipid handling and phase distribution affected the variability in the acoustic behavior of microbubbles. Cholesterol was used to modify the lateral molecular packing of 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DSPC)-based microbubbles. To assess the effect of lipid handling, microbubbles were produced by a direct method, i.e., lipids directly dispersed in an aqueous medium or indirect method, i.e., lipids first dissolved in an organic solvent. The lipid phase and ligand distribution in the microbubble coating were investigated using confocal microscopy, and the acoustic response was recorded with the Brandaris 128 ultra-high-speed camera. In microbubbles with 12 mol% cholesterol, the lipids were miscible and all in the same phase, which resulted in more buckle formation, lower shell elasticity and higher shell viscosity. Indirect DSPC microbubbles had a more uniform response to ultrasound than direct DSPC and indirect DSPC-cholesterol microbubbles. The difference in lipid handling between direct and indirect DSPC microbubbles significantly affected the acoustic behavior. Indirect DSPC microbubbles are the most promising candidate for ultrasound molecular imaging and drug delivery applications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7832861 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78328612021-01-26 The Impact of Lipid Handling and Phase Distribution on the Acoustic Behavior of Microbubbles Langeveld, Simone A.G. Beekers, Inés Collado-Lara, Gonzalo van der Steen, Antonius F. W. de Jong, Nico Kooiman, Klazina Pharmaceutics Article Phospholipid-coated microbubbles are ultrasound contrast agents that can be employed for ultrasound molecular imaging and drug delivery. For safe and effective implementation, microbubbles must respond uniformly and predictably to ultrasound. Therefore, we investigated how lipid handling and phase distribution affected the variability in the acoustic behavior of microbubbles. Cholesterol was used to modify the lateral molecular packing of 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DSPC)-based microbubbles. To assess the effect of lipid handling, microbubbles were produced by a direct method, i.e., lipids directly dispersed in an aqueous medium or indirect method, i.e., lipids first dissolved in an organic solvent. The lipid phase and ligand distribution in the microbubble coating were investigated using confocal microscopy, and the acoustic response was recorded with the Brandaris 128 ultra-high-speed camera. In microbubbles with 12 mol% cholesterol, the lipids were miscible and all in the same phase, which resulted in more buckle formation, lower shell elasticity and higher shell viscosity. Indirect DSPC microbubbles had a more uniform response to ultrasound than direct DSPC and indirect DSPC-cholesterol microbubbles. The difference in lipid handling between direct and indirect DSPC microbubbles significantly affected the acoustic behavior. Indirect DSPC microbubbles are the most promising candidate for ultrasound molecular imaging and drug delivery applications. MDPI 2021-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7832861/ /pubmed/33477843 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics13010119 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Langeveld, Simone A.G. Beekers, Inés Collado-Lara, Gonzalo van der Steen, Antonius F. W. de Jong, Nico Kooiman, Klazina The Impact of Lipid Handling and Phase Distribution on the Acoustic Behavior of Microbubbles |
title | The Impact of Lipid Handling and Phase Distribution on the Acoustic Behavior of Microbubbles |
title_full | The Impact of Lipid Handling and Phase Distribution on the Acoustic Behavior of Microbubbles |
title_fullStr | The Impact of Lipid Handling and Phase Distribution on the Acoustic Behavior of Microbubbles |
title_full_unstemmed | The Impact of Lipid Handling and Phase Distribution on the Acoustic Behavior of Microbubbles |
title_short | The Impact of Lipid Handling and Phase Distribution on the Acoustic Behavior of Microbubbles |
title_sort | impact of lipid handling and phase distribution on the acoustic behavior of microbubbles |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7832861/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33477843 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics13010119 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT langeveldsimoneag theimpactoflipidhandlingandphasedistributionontheacousticbehaviorofmicrobubbles AT beekersines theimpactoflipidhandlingandphasedistributionontheacousticbehaviorofmicrobubbles AT colladolaragonzalo theimpactoflipidhandlingandphasedistributionontheacousticbehaviorofmicrobubbles AT vandersteenantoniusfw theimpactoflipidhandlingandphasedistributionontheacousticbehaviorofmicrobubbles AT dejongnico theimpactoflipidhandlingandphasedistributionontheacousticbehaviorofmicrobubbles AT kooimanklazina theimpactoflipidhandlingandphasedistributionontheacousticbehaviorofmicrobubbles AT langeveldsimoneag impactoflipidhandlingandphasedistributionontheacousticbehaviorofmicrobubbles AT beekersines impactoflipidhandlingandphasedistributionontheacousticbehaviorofmicrobubbles AT colladolaragonzalo impactoflipidhandlingandphasedistributionontheacousticbehaviorofmicrobubbles AT vandersteenantoniusfw impactoflipidhandlingandphasedistributionontheacousticbehaviorofmicrobubbles AT dejongnico impactoflipidhandlingandphasedistributionontheacousticbehaviorofmicrobubbles AT kooimanklazina impactoflipidhandlingandphasedistributionontheacousticbehaviorofmicrobubbles |