Cargando…

Strategies for financing social health insurance schemes for providing universal health care: a comparative analysis of five countries

Background: Universal Health Coverage has become a political priority for many African countries yet there are clear challenges in achieving this goal. Though social health insurance is considered a mechanism for providing financial protection, less well documented in the literature is evidence from...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fenny, Ama P., Yates, Robert, Thompson, Rachel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7833020/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33472557
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2020.1868054
_version_ 1783641969733402624
author Fenny, Ama P.
Yates, Robert
Thompson, Rachel
author_facet Fenny, Ama P.
Yates, Robert
Thompson, Rachel
author_sort Fenny, Ama P.
collection PubMed
description Background: Universal Health Coverage has become a political priority for many African countries yet there are clear challenges in achieving this goal. Though social health insurance is considered a mechanism for providing financial protection, less well documented in the literature is evidence from countries in Africa who are at various stages of adopting this financing strategy as a way to improve health insurance coverage for their populations. Objectives: The study investigates whether social health insurance schemes are effectively and efficiently covering all groups. The objective is to provide evidence of how these schemes have been implemented and whether the fundamental goals are met. The selected countries are Ghana, Rwanda, Tanzania, Kenya and Ethiopia. The study draws lessons from the literature about how policy tools can be used to reduce financial barriers whilst ensuring a broad geographic coverage in Africa. Methods: The study relies primarily on a review of literature, both documented and grey matter, which include key documents such as government health policy documents, strategic plans, health financing policy documents, Universal Health Coverage policy documents, published literature, unpublished documents, media reports and National Health Accounts reports. Results: The results show that each of the selected countries relies on a plurality of health insurance schemes with each targeting different groups. Additionally, many of the Social Health Insurance programs start by covering the formal sector first, with the hope of covering other groups in the informal sector at a later stage. Health insurance coverage for poor groups is very low, with targeting mechanisms to cover the poor in the form of exemptions and waivers achieving no desirable results. Conclusions: The ability for Social Health Insurance programs to cover all groups has been limited in the selected countries. Hence, relying solely on social health insurance schemes to achieve Universal Health Coverage may not be plausible in Africa. Also, highly fragmented risk pools impede efforts to widen the insurance pools and promote cross-subsidies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7833020
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78330202021-02-02 Strategies for financing social health insurance schemes for providing universal health care: a comparative analysis of five countries Fenny, Ama P. Yates, Robert Thompson, Rachel Glob Health Action Original Article Background: Universal Health Coverage has become a political priority for many African countries yet there are clear challenges in achieving this goal. Though social health insurance is considered a mechanism for providing financial protection, less well documented in the literature is evidence from countries in Africa who are at various stages of adopting this financing strategy as a way to improve health insurance coverage for their populations. Objectives: The study investigates whether social health insurance schemes are effectively and efficiently covering all groups. The objective is to provide evidence of how these schemes have been implemented and whether the fundamental goals are met. The selected countries are Ghana, Rwanda, Tanzania, Kenya and Ethiopia. The study draws lessons from the literature about how policy tools can be used to reduce financial barriers whilst ensuring a broad geographic coverage in Africa. Methods: The study relies primarily on a review of literature, both documented and grey matter, which include key documents such as government health policy documents, strategic plans, health financing policy documents, Universal Health Coverage policy documents, published literature, unpublished documents, media reports and National Health Accounts reports. Results: The results show that each of the selected countries relies on a plurality of health insurance schemes with each targeting different groups. Additionally, many of the Social Health Insurance programs start by covering the formal sector first, with the hope of covering other groups in the informal sector at a later stage. Health insurance coverage for poor groups is very low, with targeting mechanisms to cover the poor in the form of exemptions and waivers achieving no desirable results. Conclusions: The ability for Social Health Insurance programs to cover all groups has been limited in the selected countries. Hence, relying solely on social health insurance schemes to achieve Universal Health Coverage may not be plausible in Africa. Also, highly fragmented risk pools impede efforts to widen the insurance pools and promote cross-subsidies. Taylor & Francis 2021-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7833020/ /pubmed/33472557 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2020.1868054 Text en © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Fenny, Ama P.
Yates, Robert
Thompson, Rachel
Strategies for financing social health insurance schemes for providing universal health care: a comparative analysis of five countries
title Strategies for financing social health insurance schemes for providing universal health care: a comparative analysis of five countries
title_full Strategies for financing social health insurance schemes for providing universal health care: a comparative analysis of five countries
title_fullStr Strategies for financing social health insurance schemes for providing universal health care: a comparative analysis of five countries
title_full_unstemmed Strategies for financing social health insurance schemes for providing universal health care: a comparative analysis of five countries
title_short Strategies for financing social health insurance schemes for providing universal health care: a comparative analysis of five countries
title_sort strategies for financing social health insurance schemes for providing universal health care: a comparative analysis of five countries
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7833020/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33472557
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2020.1868054
work_keys_str_mv AT fennyamap strategiesforfinancingsocialhealthinsuranceschemesforprovidinguniversalhealthcareacomparativeanalysisoffivecountries
AT yatesrobert strategiesforfinancingsocialhealthinsuranceschemesforprovidinguniversalhealthcareacomparativeanalysisoffivecountries
AT thompsonrachel strategiesforfinancingsocialhealthinsuranceschemesforprovidinguniversalhealthcareacomparativeanalysisoffivecountries