Cargando…
Why are self-medication opportunities limited in Austria? An interview study and comparison with other countries
BACKGROUND: Austria has high health resource use compared to similar countries. Reclassifying (switching) medicines from prescription to non-prescription can reduce pressure on health resources and aid timely access to medicines. Since Austria is less progressive in this area than many other countri...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7833129/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33493218 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245504 |
_version_ | 1783641993598992384 |
---|---|
author | Gauld, Natalie J. Baumgärtel, Christoph A. Buetow, Stephen A. |
author_facet | Gauld, Natalie J. Baumgärtel, Christoph A. Buetow, Stephen A. |
author_sort | Gauld, Natalie J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Austria has high health resource use compared to similar countries. Reclassifying (switching) medicines from prescription to non-prescription can reduce pressure on health resources and aid timely access to medicines. Since Austria is less progressive in this area than many other countries, this research aimed to elucidate enablers and barriers to it reclassifying medicines and make recommendations for change in the context of similar research conducted elsewhere. METHODS: Qualitative research using a heuristic approach was conducted in Austria in 2018. Informed by their own “insider” and “outsider” knowledge, the authors identified themes from personal interviews with 24 participants, including reclassification committee members, government officials and stakeholders, before comparing these themes with earlier research findings. RESULTS: Significant barriers to reclassification included committee conservatism, minimal political support, medical negativity and few company applications. Insufficient transparency about committee decisions, expectations of adverse committee decisions and a limited market discouraged company applications. Austria’s ‘social partnership’ arrangement and consensus decision making aided a conservative approach, but the regulator and an alternative non-committee switch process were enabling. Pharmacy showed mixed interest in reclassification. Suggested improvements include increasing transparency, committee composition changes, encouraging a more evidence-based approach by the committee, more pharmacy undergraduate clinical training, and companies using scientific advisory meetings and submitting high quality applications. CONCLUSION: Removing barriers to reclassification would facilitate non-prescription availability of medicines and encourage self-care, and could reduce pressure on healthcare resources. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7833129 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78331292021-01-26 Why are self-medication opportunities limited in Austria? An interview study and comparison with other countries Gauld, Natalie J. Baumgärtel, Christoph A. Buetow, Stephen A. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Austria has high health resource use compared to similar countries. Reclassifying (switching) medicines from prescription to non-prescription can reduce pressure on health resources and aid timely access to medicines. Since Austria is less progressive in this area than many other countries, this research aimed to elucidate enablers and barriers to it reclassifying medicines and make recommendations for change in the context of similar research conducted elsewhere. METHODS: Qualitative research using a heuristic approach was conducted in Austria in 2018. Informed by their own “insider” and “outsider” knowledge, the authors identified themes from personal interviews with 24 participants, including reclassification committee members, government officials and stakeholders, before comparing these themes with earlier research findings. RESULTS: Significant barriers to reclassification included committee conservatism, minimal political support, medical negativity and few company applications. Insufficient transparency about committee decisions, expectations of adverse committee decisions and a limited market discouraged company applications. Austria’s ‘social partnership’ arrangement and consensus decision making aided a conservative approach, but the regulator and an alternative non-committee switch process were enabling. Pharmacy showed mixed interest in reclassification. Suggested improvements include increasing transparency, committee composition changes, encouraging a more evidence-based approach by the committee, more pharmacy undergraduate clinical training, and companies using scientific advisory meetings and submitting high quality applications. CONCLUSION: Removing barriers to reclassification would facilitate non-prescription availability of medicines and encourage self-care, and could reduce pressure on healthcare resources. Public Library of Science 2021-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7833129/ /pubmed/33493218 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245504 Text en © 2021 Gauld et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Gauld, Natalie J. Baumgärtel, Christoph A. Buetow, Stephen A. Why are self-medication opportunities limited in Austria? An interview study and comparison with other countries |
title | Why are self-medication opportunities limited in Austria? An interview study and comparison with other countries |
title_full | Why are self-medication opportunities limited in Austria? An interview study and comparison with other countries |
title_fullStr | Why are self-medication opportunities limited in Austria? An interview study and comparison with other countries |
title_full_unstemmed | Why are self-medication opportunities limited in Austria? An interview study and comparison with other countries |
title_short | Why are self-medication opportunities limited in Austria? An interview study and comparison with other countries |
title_sort | why are self-medication opportunities limited in austria? an interview study and comparison with other countries |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7833129/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33493218 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245504 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gauldnataliej whyareselfmedicationopportunitieslimitedinaustriaaninterviewstudyandcomparisonwithothercountries AT baumgartelchristopha whyareselfmedicationopportunitieslimitedinaustriaaninterviewstudyandcomparisonwithothercountries AT buetowstephena whyareselfmedicationopportunitieslimitedinaustriaaninterviewstudyandcomparisonwithothercountries |