Cargando…

Diffusion weighted imaging of the breast: Performance of standardized breast tumor tissue selection methods in clinical decision making

OBJECTIVES: In breast diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) protocol standardization, it is recently shown that no breast tumor tissue selection (BTTS) method outperformed the others. The purpose of this study is to analyze the feasibility of three fixed-size breast tumor tissue selection (BTTS) methods...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wielema, M., Sijens, P. E., Dijkstra, H., De Bock, G. H., van Bruggen, I. G., Siegersma, J. E., Langius, E., Pijnappel, R. M., Dorrius, M. D., Oudkerk, M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7833148/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33493230
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245930
_version_ 1783641998212726784
author Wielema, M.
Sijens, P. E.
Dijkstra, H.
De Bock, G. H.
van Bruggen, I. G.
Siegersma, J. E.
Langius, E.
Pijnappel, R. M.
Dorrius, M. D.
Oudkerk, M.
author_facet Wielema, M.
Sijens, P. E.
Dijkstra, H.
De Bock, G. H.
van Bruggen, I. G.
Siegersma, J. E.
Langius, E.
Pijnappel, R. M.
Dorrius, M. D.
Oudkerk, M.
author_sort Wielema, M.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: In breast diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) protocol standardization, it is recently shown that no breast tumor tissue selection (BTTS) method outperformed the others. The purpose of this study is to analyze the feasibility of three fixed-size breast tumor tissue selection (BTTS) methods based on the reproducibility, accuracy and time-measurement in comparison to the largest oval and manual delineation in breast diffusion weighted imaging data. METHODS: This study is performed with a consecutive dataset of 116 breast lesions (98 malignant) of at least 1.0 cm, scanned in accordance with the EUSOBI breast DWI working group recommendations. Reproducibility of the maximum size manual (BTTS1) and of the maximal size round/oval (BTTS2) methods were compared with three smaller fixed-size circular BTTS methods in the middle of each lesion (BTTS3, 0.12 cm(3) volume) and at lowest apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) (BTTS4, 0.12 cm(3); BTTS5, 0.24 cm(3)). Mean ADC values, intraclass-correlation-coefficients (ICCs), area under the curve (AUC) and measurement times (sec) of the 5 BTTS methods were assessed by two observers. RESULTS: Excellent inter- and intra-observer agreement was found for any BTTS (with ICC 0.88–0.92 and 0.92–0.94, respectively). Significant difference in ADCmean between any pair of BTTS methods was shown (p = <0.001–0.009), except for BTTS2 vs. BTTS3 for observer 1 (p = 0.10). AUCs were comparable between BTTS methods, with highest AUC for BTTS2 (0.89–0.91) and lowest for BTTS4 (0.76–0.85). However, as an indicator of clinical feasibility, BTTS2-3 showed shortest measurement times (10–15 sec) compared to BTTS1, 4–5 (19–39 sec). CONCLUSION: The performance of fixed-size BTTS methods, as a potential tool for clinical decision making, shows equal AUC but shorter ADC measurement time compared to manual or oval whole lesion measurements. The advantage of a fixed size BTTS method is the excellent reproducibility. A central fixed breast tumor tissue volume of 0.12 cm(3) is the most feasible method for use in clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7833148
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78331482021-01-26 Diffusion weighted imaging of the breast: Performance of standardized breast tumor tissue selection methods in clinical decision making Wielema, M. Sijens, P. E. Dijkstra, H. De Bock, G. H. van Bruggen, I. G. Siegersma, J. E. Langius, E. Pijnappel, R. M. Dorrius, M. D. Oudkerk, M. PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVES: In breast diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) protocol standardization, it is recently shown that no breast tumor tissue selection (BTTS) method outperformed the others. The purpose of this study is to analyze the feasibility of three fixed-size breast tumor tissue selection (BTTS) methods based on the reproducibility, accuracy and time-measurement in comparison to the largest oval and manual delineation in breast diffusion weighted imaging data. METHODS: This study is performed with a consecutive dataset of 116 breast lesions (98 malignant) of at least 1.0 cm, scanned in accordance with the EUSOBI breast DWI working group recommendations. Reproducibility of the maximum size manual (BTTS1) and of the maximal size round/oval (BTTS2) methods were compared with three smaller fixed-size circular BTTS methods in the middle of each lesion (BTTS3, 0.12 cm(3) volume) and at lowest apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) (BTTS4, 0.12 cm(3); BTTS5, 0.24 cm(3)). Mean ADC values, intraclass-correlation-coefficients (ICCs), area under the curve (AUC) and measurement times (sec) of the 5 BTTS methods were assessed by two observers. RESULTS: Excellent inter- and intra-observer agreement was found for any BTTS (with ICC 0.88–0.92 and 0.92–0.94, respectively). Significant difference in ADCmean between any pair of BTTS methods was shown (p = <0.001–0.009), except for BTTS2 vs. BTTS3 for observer 1 (p = 0.10). AUCs were comparable between BTTS methods, with highest AUC for BTTS2 (0.89–0.91) and lowest for BTTS4 (0.76–0.85). However, as an indicator of clinical feasibility, BTTS2-3 showed shortest measurement times (10–15 sec) compared to BTTS1, 4–5 (19–39 sec). CONCLUSION: The performance of fixed-size BTTS methods, as a potential tool for clinical decision making, shows equal AUC but shorter ADC measurement time compared to manual or oval whole lesion measurements. The advantage of a fixed size BTTS method is the excellent reproducibility. A central fixed breast tumor tissue volume of 0.12 cm(3) is the most feasible method for use in clinical practice. Public Library of Science 2021-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7833148/ /pubmed/33493230 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245930 Text en © 2021 Wielema et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wielema, M.
Sijens, P. E.
Dijkstra, H.
De Bock, G. H.
van Bruggen, I. G.
Siegersma, J. E.
Langius, E.
Pijnappel, R. M.
Dorrius, M. D.
Oudkerk, M.
Diffusion weighted imaging of the breast: Performance of standardized breast tumor tissue selection methods in clinical decision making
title Diffusion weighted imaging of the breast: Performance of standardized breast tumor tissue selection methods in clinical decision making
title_full Diffusion weighted imaging of the breast: Performance of standardized breast tumor tissue selection methods in clinical decision making
title_fullStr Diffusion weighted imaging of the breast: Performance of standardized breast tumor tissue selection methods in clinical decision making
title_full_unstemmed Diffusion weighted imaging of the breast: Performance of standardized breast tumor tissue selection methods in clinical decision making
title_short Diffusion weighted imaging of the breast: Performance of standardized breast tumor tissue selection methods in clinical decision making
title_sort diffusion weighted imaging of the breast: performance of standardized breast tumor tissue selection methods in clinical decision making
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7833148/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33493230
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245930
work_keys_str_mv AT wielemam diffusionweightedimagingofthebreastperformanceofstandardizedbreasttumortissueselectionmethodsinclinicaldecisionmaking
AT sijenspe diffusionweightedimagingofthebreastperformanceofstandardizedbreasttumortissueselectionmethodsinclinicaldecisionmaking
AT dijkstrah diffusionweightedimagingofthebreastperformanceofstandardizedbreasttumortissueselectionmethodsinclinicaldecisionmaking
AT debockgh diffusionweightedimagingofthebreastperformanceofstandardizedbreasttumortissueselectionmethodsinclinicaldecisionmaking
AT vanbruggenig diffusionweightedimagingofthebreastperformanceofstandardizedbreasttumortissueselectionmethodsinclinicaldecisionmaking
AT siegersmaje diffusionweightedimagingofthebreastperformanceofstandardizedbreasttumortissueselectionmethodsinclinicaldecisionmaking
AT langiuse diffusionweightedimagingofthebreastperformanceofstandardizedbreasttumortissueselectionmethodsinclinicaldecisionmaking
AT pijnappelrm diffusionweightedimagingofthebreastperformanceofstandardizedbreasttumortissueselectionmethodsinclinicaldecisionmaking
AT dorriusmd diffusionweightedimagingofthebreastperformanceofstandardizedbreasttumortissueselectionmethodsinclinicaldecisionmaking
AT oudkerkm diffusionweightedimagingofthebreastperformanceofstandardizedbreasttumortissueselectionmethodsinclinicaldecisionmaking