Cargando…
Diffusion weighted imaging of the breast: Performance of standardized breast tumor tissue selection methods in clinical decision making
OBJECTIVES: In breast diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) protocol standardization, it is recently shown that no breast tumor tissue selection (BTTS) method outperformed the others. The purpose of this study is to analyze the feasibility of three fixed-size breast tumor tissue selection (BTTS) methods...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7833148/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33493230 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245930 |
_version_ | 1783641998212726784 |
---|---|
author | Wielema, M. Sijens, P. E. Dijkstra, H. De Bock, G. H. van Bruggen, I. G. Siegersma, J. E. Langius, E. Pijnappel, R. M. Dorrius, M. D. Oudkerk, M. |
author_facet | Wielema, M. Sijens, P. E. Dijkstra, H. De Bock, G. H. van Bruggen, I. G. Siegersma, J. E. Langius, E. Pijnappel, R. M. Dorrius, M. D. Oudkerk, M. |
author_sort | Wielema, M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: In breast diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) protocol standardization, it is recently shown that no breast tumor tissue selection (BTTS) method outperformed the others. The purpose of this study is to analyze the feasibility of three fixed-size breast tumor tissue selection (BTTS) methods based on the reproducibility, accuracy and time-measurement in comparison to the largest oval and manual delineation in breast diffusion weighted imaging data. METHODS: This study is performed with a consecutive dataset of 116 breast lesions (98 malignant) of at least 1.0 cm, scanned in accordance with the EUSOBI breast DWI working group recommendations. Reproducibility of the maximum size manual (BTTS1) and of the maximal size round/oval (BTTS2) methods were compared with three smaller fixed-size circular BTTS methods in the middle of each lesion (BTTS3, 0.12 cm(3) volume) and at lowest apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) (BTTS4, 0.12 cm(3); BTTS5, 0.24 cm(3)). Mean ADC values, intraclass-correlation-coefficients (ICCs), area under the curve (AUC) and measurement times (sec) of the 5 BTTS methods were assessed by two observers. RESULTS: Excellent inter- and intra-observer agreement was found for any BTTS (with ICC 0.88–0.92 and 0.92–0.94, respectively). Significant difference in ADCmean between any pair of BTTS methods was shown (p = <0.001–0.009), except for BTTS2 vs. BTTS3 for observer 1 (p = 0.10). AUCs were comparable between BTTS methods, with highest AUC for BTTS2 (0.89–0.91) and lowest for BTTS4 (0.76–0.85). However, as an indicator of clinical feasibility, BTTS2-3 showed shortest measurement times (10–15 sec) compared to BTTS1, 4–5 (19–39 sec). CONCLUSION: The performance of fixed-size BTTS methods, as a potential tool for clinical decision making, shows equal AUC but shorter ADC measurement time compared to manual or oval whole lesion measurements. The advantage of a fixed size BTTS method is the excellent reproducibility. A central fixed breast tumor tissue volume of 0.12 cm(3) is the most feasible method for use in clinical practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7833148 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78331482021-01-26 Diffusion weighted imaging of the breast: Performance of standardized breast tumor tissue selection methods in clinical decision making Wielema, M. Sijens, P. E. Dijkstra, H. De Bock, G. H. van Bruggen, I. G. Siegersma, J. E. Langius, E. Pijnappel, R. M. Dorrius, M. D. Oudkerk, M. PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVES: In breast diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) protocol standardization, it is recently shown that no breast tumor tissue selection (BTTS) method outperformed the others. The purpose of this study is to analyze the feasibility of three fixed-size breast tumor tissue selection (BTTS) methods based on the reproducibility, accuracy and time-measurement in comparison to the largest oval and manual delineation in breast diffusion weighted imaging data. METHODS: This study is performed with a consecutive dataset of 116 breast lesions (98 malignant) of at least 1.0 cm, scanned in accordance with the EUSOBI breast DWI working group recommendations. Reproducibility of the maximum size manual (BTTS1) and of the maximal size round/oval (BTTS2) methods were compared with three smaller fixed-size circular BTTS methods in the middle of each lesion (BTTS3, 0.12 cm(3) volume) and at lowest apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) (BTTS4, 0.12 cm(3); BTTS5, 0.24 cm(3)). Mean ADC values, intraclass-correlation-coefficients (ICCs), area under the curve (AUC) and measurement times (sec) of the 5 BTTS methods were assessed by two observers. RESULTS: Excellent inter- and intra-observer agreement was found for any BTTS (with ICC 0.88–0.92 and 0.92–0.94, respectively). Significant difference in ADCmean between any pair of BTTS methods was shown (p = <0.001–0.009), except for BTTS2 vs. BTTS3 for observer 1 (p = 0.10). AUCs were comparable between BTTS methods, with highest AUC for BTTS2 (0.89–0.91) and lowest for BTTS4 (0.76–0.85). However, as an indicator of clinical feasibility, BTTS2-3 showed shortest measurement times (10–15 sec) compared to BTTS1, 4–5 (19–39 sec). CONCLUSION: The performance of fixed-size BTTS methods, as a potential tool for clinical decision making, shows equal AUC but shorter ADC measurement time compared to manual or oval whole lesion measurements. The advantage of a fixed size BTTS method is the excellent reproducibility. A central fixed breast tumor tissue volume of 0.12 cm(3) is the most feasible method for use in clinical practice. Public Library of Science 2021-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7833148/ /pubmed/33493230 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245930 Text en © 2021 Wielema et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Wielema, M. Sijens, P. E. Dijkstra, H. De Bock, G. H. van Bruggen, I. G. Siegersma, J. E. Langius, E. Pijnappel, R. M. Dorrius, M. D. Oudkerk, M. Diffusion weighted imaging of the breast: Performance of standardized breast tumor tissue selection methods in clinical decision making |
title | Diffusion weighted imaging of the breast: Performance of standardized breast tumor tissue selection methods in clinical decision making |
title_full | Diffusion weighted imaging of the breast: Performance of standardized breast tumor tissue selection methods in clinical decision making |
title_fullStr | Diffusion weighted imaging of the breast: Performance of standardized breast tumor tissue selection methods in clinical decision making |
title_full_unstemmed | Diffusion weighted imaging of the breast: Performance of standardized breast tumor tissue selection methods in clinical decision making |
title_short | Diffusion weighted imaging of the breast: Performance of standardized breast tumor tissue selection methods in clinical decision making |
title_sort | diffusion weighted imaging of the breast: performance of standardized breast tumor tissue selection methods in clinical decision making |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7833148/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33493230 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245930 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wielemam diffusionweightedimagingofthebreastperformanceofstandardizedbreasttumortissueselectionmethodsinclinicaldecisionmaking AT sijenspe diffusionweightedimagingofthebreastperformanceofstandardizedbreasttumortissueselectionmethodsinclinicaldecisionmaking AT dijkstrah diffusionweightedimagingofthebreastperformanceofstandardizedbreasttumortissueselectionmethodsinclinicaldecisionmaking AT debockgh diffusionweightedimagingofthebreastperformanceofstandardizedbreasttumortissueselectionmethodsinclinicaldecisionmaking AT vanbruggenig diffusionweightedimagingofthebreastperformanceofstandardizedbreasttumortissueselectionmethodsinclinicaldecisionmaking AT siegersmaje diffusionweightedimagingofthebreastperformanceofstandardizedbreasttumortissueselectionmethodsinclinicaldecisionmaking AT langiuse diffusionweightedimagingofthebreastperformanceofstandardizedbreasttumortissueselectionmethodsinclinicaldecisionmaking AT pijnappelrm diffusionweightedimagingofthebreastperformanceofstandardizedbreasttumortissueselectionmethodsinclinicaldecisionmaking AT dorriusmd diffusionweightedimagingofthebreastperformanceofstandardizedbreasttumortissueselectionmethodsinclinicaldecisionmaking AT oudkerkm diffusionweightedimagingofthebreastperformanceofstandardizedbreasttumortissueselectionmethodsinclinicaldecisionmaking |