Cargando…

T cell response to SARS-CoV-2 infection in humans: A systematic review

BACKGROUND: Understanding the T cell response to SARS-CoV-2 is critical to vaccine development, epidemiological surveillance and disease control strategies. This systematic review critically evaluates and synthesises the relevant peer-reviewed and pre-print literature published from 01/01/2020-26/06...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shrotri, Madhumita, van Schalkwyk, May C. I., Post, Nathan, Eddy, Danielle, Huntley, Catherine, Leeman, David, Rigby, Samuel, Williams, Sarah V., Bermingham, William H., Kellam, Paul, Maher, John, Shields, Adrian M., Amirthalingam, Gayatri, Peacock, Sharon J., Ismail, Sharif A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7833159/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33493185
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245532
_version_ 1783642001250451456
author Shrotri, Madhumita
van Schalkwyk, May C. I.
Post, Nathan
Eddy, Danielle
Huntley, Catherine
Leeman, David
Rigby, Samuel
Williams, Sarah V.
Bermingham, William H.
Kellam, Paul
Maher, John
Shields, Adrian M.
Amirthalingam, Gayatri
Peacock, Sharon J.
Ismail, Sharif A.
author_facet Shrotri, Madhumita
van Schalkwyk, May C. I.
Post, Nathan
Eddy, Danielle
Huntley, Catherine
Leeman, David
Rigby, Samuel
Williams, Sarah V.
Bermingham, William H.
Kellam, Paul
Maher, John
Shields, Adrian M.
Amirthalingam, Gayatri
Peacock, Sharon J.
Ismail, Sharif A.
author_sort Shrotri, Madhumita
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Understanding the T cell response to SARS-CoV-2 is critical to vaccine development, epidemiological surveillance and disease control strategies. This systematic review critically evaluates and synthesises the relevant peer-reviewed and pre-print literature published from 01/01/2020-26/06/2020. METHODS: For this systematic review, keyword-structured literature searches were carried out in MEDLINE, Embase and COVID-19 Primer. Papers were independently screened by two researchers, with arbitration of disagreements by a third researcher. Data were independently extracted into a pre-designed Excel template and studies critically appraised using a modified version of the MetaQAT tool, with resolution of disagreements by consensus. Findings were narratively synthesised. RESULTS: 61 articles were included. 55 (90%) studies used observational designs, 50 (82%) involved hospitalised patients with higher acuity illness, and the majority had important limitations. Symptomatic adult COVID-19 cases consistently show peripheral T cell lymphopenia, which positively correlates with increased disease severity, duration of RNA positivity, and non-survival; while asymptomatic and paediatric cases display preserved counts. People with severe or critical disease generally develop more robust, virus-specific T cell responses. T cell memory and effector function has been demonstrated against multiple viral epitopes, and, cross-reactive T cell responses have been demonstrated in unexposed and uninfected adults, but the significance for protection and susceptibility, respectively, remains unclear. CONCLUSION: A complex pattern of T cell response to SARS-CoV-2 infection has been demonstrated, but inferences regarding population level immunity are hampered by significant methodological limitations and heterogeneity between studies, as well as a striking lack of research in asymptomatic or pauci-symptomatic individuals. In contrast to antibody responses, population-level surveillance of the T cell response is unlikely to be feasible in the near term. Focused evaluation in specific sub-groups, including vaccine recipients, should be prioritised.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7833159
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78331592021-01-26 T cell response to SARS-CoV-2 infection in humans: A systematic review Shrotri, Madhumita van Schalkwyk, May C. I. Post, Nathan Eddy, Danielle Huntley, Catherine Leeman, David Rigby, Samuel Williams, Sarah V. Bermingham, William H. Kellam, Paul Maher, John Shields, Adrian M. Amirthalingam, Gayatri Peacock, Sharon J. Ismail, Sharif A. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Understanding the T cell response to SARS-CoV-2 is critical to vaccine development, epidemiological surveillance and disease control strategies. This systematic review critically evaluates and synthesises the relevant peer-reviewed and pre-print literature published from 01/01/2020-26/06/2020. METHODS: For this systematic review, keyword-structured literature searches were carried out in MEDLINE, Embase and COVID-19 Primer. Papers were independently screened by two researchers, with arbitration of disagreements by a third researcher. Data were independently extracted into a pre-designed Excel template and studies critically appraised using a modified version of the MetaQAT tool, with resolution of disagreements by consensus. Findings were narratively synthesised. RESULTS: 61 articles were included. 55 (90%) studies used observational designs, 50 (82%) involved hospitalised patients with higher acuity illness, and the majority had important limitations. Symptomatic adult COVID-19 cases consistently show peripheral T cell lymphopenia, which positively correlates with increased disease severity, duration of RNA positivity, and non-survival; while asymptomatic and paediatric cases display preserved counts. People with severe or critical disease generally develop more robust, virus-specific T cell responses. T cell memory and effector function has been demonstrated against multiple viral epitopes, and, cross-reactive T cell responses have been demonstrated in unexposed and uninfected adults, but the significance for protection and susceptibility, respectively, remains unclear. CONCLUSION: A complex pattern of T cell response to SARS-CoV-2 infection has been demonstrated, but inferences regarding population level immunity are hampered by significant methodological limitations and heterogeneity between studies, as well as a striking lack of research in asymptomatic or pauci-symptomatic individuals. In contrast to antibody responses, population-level surveillance of the T cell response is unlikely to be feasible in the near term. Focused evaluation in specific sub-groups, including vaccine recipients, should be prioritised. Public Library of Science 2021-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7833159/ /pubmed/33493185 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245532 Text en © 2021 Shrotri et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Shrotri, Madhumita
van Schalkwyk, May C. I.
Post, Nathan
Eddy, Danielle
Huntley, Catherine
Leeman, David
Rigby, Samuel
Williams, Sarah V.
Bermingham, William H.
Kellam, Paul
Maher, John
Shields, Adrian M.
Amirthalingam, Gayatri
Peacock, Sharon J.
Ismail, Sharif A.
T cell response to SARS-CoV-2 infection in humans: A systematic review
title T cell response to SARS-CoV-2 infection in humans: A systematic review
title_full T cell response to SARS-CoV-2 infection in humans: A systematic review
title_fullStr T cell response to SARS-CoV-2 infection in humans: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed T cell response to SARS-CoV-2 infection in humans: A systematic review
title_short T cell response to SARS-CoV-2 infection in humans: A systematic review
title_sort t cell response to sars-cov-2 infection in humans: a systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7833159/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33493185
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245532
work_keys_str_mv AT shrotrimadhumita tcellresponsetosarscov2infectioninhumansasystematicreview
AT vanschalkwykmayci tcellresponsetosarscov2infectioninhumansasystematicreview
AT postnathan tcellresponsetosarscov2infectioninhumansasystematicreview
AT eddydanielle tcellresponsetosarscov2infectioninhumansasystematicreview
AT huntleycatherine tcellresponsetosarscov2infectioninhumansasystematicreview
AT leemandavid tcellresponsetosarscov2infectioninhumansasystematicreview
AT rigbysamuel tcellresponsetosarscov2infectioninhumansasystematicreview
AT williamssarahv tcellresponsetosarscov2infectioninhumansasystematicreview
AT berminghamwilliamh tcellresponsetosarscov2infectioninhumansasystematicreview
AT kellampaul tcellresponsetosarscov2infectioninhumansasystematicreview
AT maherjohn tcellresponsetosarscov2infectioninhumansasystematicreview
AT shieldsadrianm tcellresponsetosarscov2infectioninhumansasystematicreview
AT amirthalingamgayatri tcellresponsetosarscov2infectioninhumansasystematicreview
AT peacocksharonj tcellresponsetosarscov2infectioninhumansasystematicreview
AT ismailsharifa tcellresponsetosarscov2infectioninhumansasystematicreview