Cargando…
T cell response to SARS-CoV-2 infection in humans: A systematic review
BACKGROUND: Understanding the T cell response to SARS-CoV-2 is critical to vaccine development, epidemiological surveillance and disease control strategies. This systematic review critically evaluates and synthesises the relevant peer-reviewed and pre-print literature published from 01/01/2020-26/06...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7833159/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33493185 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245532 |
_version_ | 1783642001250451456 |
---|---|
author | Shrotri, Madhumita van Schalkwyk, May C. I. Post, Nathan Eddy, Danielle Huntley, Catherine Leeman, David Rigby, Samuel Williams, Sarah V. Bermingham, William H. Kellam, Paul Maher, John Shields, Adrian M. Amirthalingam, Gayatri Peacock, Sharon J. Ismail, Sharif A. |
author_facet | Shrotri, Madhumita van Schalkwyk, May C. I. Post, Nathan Eddy, Danielle Huntley, Catherine Leeman, David Rigby, Samuel Williams, Sarah V. Bermingham, William H. Kellam, Paul Maher, John Shields, Adrian M. Amirthalingam, Gayatri Peacock, Sharon J. Ismail, Sharif A. |
author_sort | Shrotri, Madhumita |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Understanding the T cell response to SARS-CoV-2 is critical to vaccine development, epidemiological surveillance and disease control strategies. This systematic review critically evaluates and synthesises the relevant peer-reviewed and pre-print literature published from 01/01/2020-26/06/2020. METHODS: For this systematic review, keyword-structured literature searches were carried out in MEDLINE, Embase and COVID-19 Primer. Papers were independently screened by two researchers, with arbitration of disagreements by a third researcher. Data were independently extracted into a pre-designed Excel template and studies critically appraised using a modified version of the MetaQAT tool, with resolution of disagreements by consensus. Findings were narratively synthesised. RESULTS: 61 articles were included. 55 (90%) studies used observational designs, 50 (82%) involved hospitalised patients with higher acuity illness, and the majority had important limitations. Symptomatic adult COVID-19 cases consistently show peripheral T cell lymphopenia, which positively correlates with increased disease severity, duration of RNA positivity, and non-survival; while asymptomatic and paediatric cases display preserved counts. People with severe or critical disease generally develop more robust, virus-specific T cell responses. T cell memory and effector function has been demonstrated against multiple viral epitopes, and, cross-reactive T cell responses have been demonstrated in unexposed and uninfected adults, but the significance for protection and susceptibility, respectively, remains unclear. CONCLUSION: A complex pattern of T cell response to SARS-CoV-2 infection has been demonstrated, but inferences regarding population level immunity are hampered by significant methodological limitations and heterogeneity between studies, as well as a striking lack of research in asymptomatic or pauci-symptomatic individuals. In contrast to antibody responses, population-level surveillance of the T cell response is unlikely to be feasible in the near term. Focused evaluation in specific sub-groups, including vaccine recipients, should be prioritised. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7833159 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78331592021-01-26 T cell response to SARS-CoV-2 infection in humans: A systematic review Shrotri, Madhumita van Schalkwyk, May C. I. Post, Nathan Eddy, Danielle Huntley, Catherine Leeman, David Rigby, Samuel Williams, Sarah V. Bermingham, William H. Kellam, Paul Maher, John Shields, Adrian M. Amirthalingam, Gayatri Peacock, Sharon J. Ismail, Sharif A. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Understanding the T cell response to SARS-CoV-2 is critical to vaccine development, epidemiological surveillance and disease control strategies. This systematic review critically evaluates and synthesises the relevant peer-reviewed and pre-print literature published from 01/01/2020-26/06/2020. METHODS: For this systematic review, keyword-structured literature searches were carried out in MEDLINE, Embase and COVID-19 Primer. Papers were independently screened by two researchers, with arbitration of disagreements by a third researcher. Data were independently extracted into a pre-designed Excel template and studies critically appraised using a modified version of the MetaQAT tool, with resolution of disagreements by consensus. Findings were narratively synthesised. RESULTS: 61 articles were included. 55 (90%) studies used observational designs, 50 (82%) involved hospitalised patients with higher acuity illness, and the majority had important limitations. Symptomatic adult COVID-19 cases consistently show peripheral T cell lymphopenia, which positively correlates with increased disease severity, duration of RNA positivity, and non-survival; while asymptomatic and paediatric cases display preserved counts. People with severe or critical disease generally develop more robust, virus-specific T cell responses. T cell memory and effector function has been demonstrated against multiple viral epitopes, and, cross-reactive T cell responses have been demonstrated in unexposed and uninfected adults, but the significance for protection and susceptibility, respectively, remains unclear. CONCLUSION: A complex pattern of T cell response to SARS-CoV-2 infection has been demonstrated, but inferences regarding population level immunity are hampered by significant methodological limitations and heterogeneity between studies, as well as a striking lack of research in asymptomatic or pauci-symptomatic individuals. In contrast to antibody responses, population-level surveillance of the T cell response is unlikely to be feasible in the near term. Focused evaluation in specific sub-groups, including vaccine recipients, should be prioritised. Public Library of Science 2021-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7833159/ /pubmed/33493185 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245532 Text en © 2021 Shrotri et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Shrotri, Madhumita van Schalkwyk, May C. I. Post, Nathan Eddy, Danielle Huntley, Catherine Leeman, David Rigby, Samuel Williams, Sarah V. Bermingham, William H. Kellam, Paul Maher, John Shields, Adrian M. Amirthalingam, Gayatri Peacock, Sharon J. Ismail, Sharif A. T cell response to SARS-CoV-2 infection in humans: A systematic review |
title | T cell response to SARS-CoV-2 infection in humans: A systematic review |
title_full | T cell response to SARS-CoV-2 infection in humans: A systematic review |
title_fullStr | T cell response to SARS-CoV-2 infection in humans: A systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | T cell response to SARS-CoV-2 infection in humans: A systematic review |
title_short | T cell response to SARS-CoV-2 infection in humans: A systematic review |
title_sort | t cell response to sars-cov-2 infection in humans: a systematic review |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7833159/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33493185 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245532 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shrotrimadhumita tcellresponsetosarscov2infectioninhumansasystematicreview AT vanschalkwykmayci tcellresponsetosarscov2infectioninhumansasystematicreview AT postnathan tcellresponsetosarscov2infectioninhumansasystematicreview AT eddydanielle tcellresponsetosarscov2infectioninhumansasystematicreview AT huntleycatherine tcellresponsetosarscov2infectioninhumansasystematicreview AT leemandavid tcellresponsetosarscov2infectioninhumansasystematicreview AT rigbysamuel tcellresponsetosarscov2infectioninhumansasystematicreview AT williamssarahv tcellresponsetosarscov2infectioninhumansasystematicreview AT berminghamwilliamh tcellresponsetosarscov2infectioninhumansasystematicreview AT kellampaul tcellresponsetosarscov2infectioninhumansasystematicreview AT maherjohn tcellresponsetosarscov2infectioninhumansasystematicreview AT shieldsadrianm tcellresponsetosarscov2infectioninhumansasystematicreview AT amirthalingamgayatri tcellresponsetosarscov2infectioninhumansasystematicreview AT peacocksharonj tcellresponsetosarscov2infectioninhumansasystematicreview AT ismailsharifa tcellresponsetosarscov2infectioninhumansasystematicreview |