Cargando…

Clinically applicable approach for predicting mechanical ventilation in patients with COVID-19

BACKGROUND: Patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) requiring mechanical ventilation have high mortality and resource utilisation. The ability to predict which patients may require mechanical ventilation allows increased acuity of care and targeted interventions to potentially mitigate det...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Douville, Nicholas J., Douville, Christopher B., Mentz, Graciela, Mathis, Michael R., Pancaro, Carlo, Tremper, Kevin K., Engoren, Milo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7833820/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33454051
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2020.11.034
_version_ 1783642149225496576
author Douville, Nicholas J.
Douville, Christopher B.
Mentz, Graciela
Mathis, Michael R.
Pancaro, Carlo
Tremper, Kevin K.
Engoren, Milo
author_facet Douville, Nicholas J.
Douville, Christopher B.
Mentz, Graciela
Mathis, Michael R.
Pancaro, Carlo
Tremper, Kevin K.
Engoren, Milo
author_sort Douville, Nicholas J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) requiring mechanical ventilation have high mortality and resource utilisation. The ability to predict which patients may require mechanical ventilation allows increased acuity of care and targeted interventions to potentially mitigate deterioration. METHODS: We included hospitalised patients with COVID-19 in this single-centre retrospective observational study. Our primary outcome was mechanical ventilation or death within 24 h. As clinical decompensation is more recognisable, but less modifiable, as the prediction window shrinks, we also assessed 4, 8, and 48 h prediction windows. Model features included demographic information, laboratory results, comorbidities, medication administration, and vital signs. We created a Random Forest model, and assessed performance using 10-fold cross-validation. The model was compared with models derived from generalised estimating equations using discrimination. RESULTS: Ninety-three (23%) of 398 patients required mechanical ventilation or died within 14 days of admission. The Random Forest model predicted pending mechanical ventilation with good discrimination (C-statistic=0.858; 95% confidence interval, 0.841–0.874), which is comparable with the discrimination of the generalised estimating equation regression. Vitals sign data including SpO(2)/FiO(2) ratio (Random Forest Feature Importance Z-score=8.56), ventilatory frequency (5.97), and heart rate (5.87) had the highest predictive utility. In our highest-risk cohort, the number of patients needed to identify a single new case was 3.2, and for our second quintile it was 5.0. CONCLUSION: Machine learning techniques can be leveraged to improve the ability to predict which patients with COVID-19 are likely to require mechanical ventilation, identifying unrecognised bellwethers and providing insight into the constellation of accompanying signs of respiratory failure in COVID-19.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7833820
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78338202021-01-26 Clinically applicable approach for predicting mechanical ventilation in patients with COVID-19 Douville, Nicholas J. Douville, Christopher B. Mentz, Graciela Mathis, Michael R. Pancaro, Carlo Tremper, Kevin K. Engoren, Milo Br J Anaesth Clinical Investigation BACKGROUND: Patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) requiring mechanical ventilation have high mortality and resource utilisation. The ability to predict which patients may require mechanical ventilation allows increased acuity of care and targeted interventions to potentially mitigate deterioration. METHODS: We included hospitalised patients with COVID-19 in this single-centre retrospective observational study. Our primary outcome was mechanical ventilation or death within 24 h. As clinical decompensation is more recognisable, but less modifiable, as the prediction window shrinks, we also assessed 4, 8, and 48 h prediction windows. Model features included demographic information, laboratory results, comorbidities, medication administration, and vital signs. We created a Random Forest model, and assessed performance using 10-fold cross-validation. The model was compared with models derived from generalised estimating equations using discrimination. RESULTS: Ninety-three (23%) of 398 patients required mechanical ventilation or died within 14 days of admission. The Random Forest model predicted pending mechanical ventilation with good discrimination (C-statistic=0.858; 95% confidence interval, 0.841–0.874), which is comparable with the discrimination of the generalised estimating equation regression. Vitals sign data including SpO(2)/FiO(2) ratio (Random Forest Feature Importance Z-score=8.56), ventilatory frequency (5.97), and heart rate (5.87) had the highest predictive utility. In our highest-risk cohort, the number of patients needed to identify a single new case was 3.2, and for our second quintile it was 5.0. CONCLUSION: Machine learning techniques can be leveraged to improve the ability to predict which patients with COVID-19 are likely to require mechanical ventilation, identifying unrecognised bellwethers and providing insight into the constellation of accompanying signs of respiratory failure in COVID-19. Elsevier 2021-03 2020-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7833820/ /pubmed/33454051 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2020.11.034 Text en © 2020 British Journal of Anaesthesia. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
spellingShingle Clinical Investigation
Douville, Nicholas J.
Douville, Christopher B.
Mentz, Graciela
Mathis, Michael R.
Pancaro, Carlo
Tremper, Kevin K.
Engoren, Milo
Clinically applicable approach for predicting mechanical ventilation in patients with COVID-19
title Clinically applicable approach for predicting mechanical ventilation in patients with COVID-19
title_full Clinically applicable approach for predicting mechanical ventilation in patients with COVID-19
title_fullStr Clinically applicable approach for predicting mechanical ventilation in patients with COVID-19
title_full_unstemmed Clinically applicable approach for predicting mechanical ventilation in patients with COVID-19
title_short Clinically applicable approach for predicting mechanical ventilation in patients with COVID-19
title_sort clinically applicable approach for predicting mechanical ventilation in patients with covid-19
topic Clinical Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7833820/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33454051
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2020.11.034
work_keys_str_mv AT douvillenicholasj clinicallyapplicableapproachforpredictingmechanicalventilationinpatientswithcovid19
AT douvillechristopherb clinicallyapplicableapproachforpredictingmechanicalventilationinpatientswithcovid19
AT mentzgraciela clinicallyapplicableapproachforpredictingmechanicalventilationinpatientswithcovid19
AT mathismichaelr clinicallyapplicableapproachforpredictingmechanicalventilationinpatientswithcovid19
AT pancarocarlo clinicallyapplicableapproachforpredictingmechanicalventilationinpatientswithcovid19
AT tremperkevink clinicallyapplicableapproachforpredictingmechanicalventilationinpatientswithcovid19
AT engorenmilo clinicallyapplicableapproachforpredictingmechanicalventilationinpatientswithcovid19