Cargando…
The effect of clinical decision making for initiation of systemic anticancer treatments in response to the COVID-19 pandemic in England: a retrospective analysis
BACKGROUND: Cancer services worldwide had to adapt in response to the COVID-19 pandemic to minimise risk to patients and staff. We aimed to assess the national impact of COVID-19 on the prescribing of systemic anticancer treatment in England, immediately after lockdown and after the introduction of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Ltd.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7833889/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33253639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30619-7 |
_version_ | 1783642162703892480 |
---|---|
author | Clark, James J Dwyer, Dominic Pinwill, Nina Clark, Peter Johnson, Peter Hackshaw, Allan |
author_facet | Clark, James J Dwyer, Dominic Pinwill, Nina Clark, Peter Johnson, Peter Hackshaw, Allan |
author_sort | Clark, James J |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Cancer services worldwide had to adapt in response to the COVID-19 pandemic to minimise risk to patients and staff. We aimed to assess the national impact of COVID-19 on the prescribing of systemic anticancer treatment in England, immediately after lockdown and after the introduction of new treatments to reduce patient risk. METHODS: We did a retrospective analysis using data from a central National Health Service England web database mandated for clinicians to register intention to start all new systemic anticancer treatments approved for use in England since 2016. We analysed the monthly number of treatment registrations in April, 2020, after the implementation of societal lockdown on March 23, 2020, and after implementation of treatment options to reduce patient risk such as oral or less immunosuppressive drugs, in May and June, 2020. We compared the number of registrations in April–June, 2020, with the mean number of registrations and SD during the previous 6 months of unaffected cancer care (September, 2019, to February, 2020). We calculated the percentage change and absolute difference in SD units for the number of registrations overall, by tumour type, and by type and line of therapy. FINDINGS: In April, 2020, 2969 registrations were recorded, representing 1417 fewer registrations than in the control period (monthly mean 4386; 32% reduction, absolute difference 4·2 SDs, p<0·0001). In May, 2020, total registrations increased to 3950, representing a 10% reduction compared with the control period (absolute difference 1·3 SDs, p<0·0001). In June, 2020, 5022 registrations were recorded, representing a 15% increase compared with the control period (absolute difference 1·9 SDs; p<0·0001]). INTERPRETATION: After the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a reduction in systemic anticancer treatment initiation in England. However, following introduction of treatment options to reduce patient risk, registrations began to increase in May, 2020, and reached higher numbers than the pre-pandemic mean in June, 2020, when other clinical and societal risk mitigation factors (such as telephone consultations, facemasks and physical distancing) are likely to have contributed. However, outcomes of providing less treatment or delaying treatment initiation, particularly for advanced cancers and neoadjuvant therapies, require continued assessment. FUNDING: None. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7833889 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78338892021-01-26 The effect of clinical decision making for initiation of systemic anticancer treatments in response to the COVID-19 pandemic in England: a retrospective analysis Clark, James J Dwyer, Dominic Pinwill, Nina Clark, Peter Johnson, Peter Hackshaw, Allan Lancet Oncol Articles BACKGROUND: Cancer services worldwide had to adapt in response to the COVID-19 pandemic to minimise risk to patients and staff. We aimed to assess the national impact of COVID-19 on the prescribing of systemic anticancer treatment in England, immediately after lockdown and after the introduction of new treatments to reduce patient risk. METHODS: We did a retrospective analysis using data from a central National Health Service England web database mandated for clinicians to register intention to start all new systemic anticancer treatments approved for use in England since 2016. We analysed the monthly number of treatment registrations in April, 2020, after the implementation of societal lockdown on March 23, 2020, and after implementation of treatment options to reduce patient risk such as oral or less immunosuppressive drugs, in May and June, 2020. We compared the number of registrations in April–June, 2020, with the mean number of registrations and SD during the previous 6 months of unaffected cancer care (September, 2019, to February, 2020). We calculated the percentage change and absolute difference in SD units for the number of registrations overall, by tumour type, and by type and line of therapy. FINDINGS: In April, 2020, 2969 registrations were recorded, representing 1417 fewer registrations than in the control period (monthly mean 4386; 32% reduction, absolute difference 4·2 SDs, p<0·0001). In May, 2020, total registrations increased to 3950, representing a 10% reduction compared with the control period (absolute difference 1·3 SDs, p<0·0001). In June, 2020, 5022 registrations were recorded, representing a 15% increase compared with the control period (absolute difference 1·9 SDs; p<0·0001]). INTERPRETATION: After the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a reduction in systemic anticancer treatment initiation in England. However, following introduction of treatment options to reduce patient risk, registrations began to increase in May, 2020, and reached higher numbers than the pre-pandemic mean in June, 2020, when other clinical and societal risk mitigation factors (such as telephone consultations, facemasks and physical distancing) are likely to have contributed. However, outcomes of providing less treatment or delaying treatment initiation, particularly for advanced cancers and neoadjuvant therapies, require continued assessment. FUNDING: None. Elsevier Ltd. 2021-01 2020-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7833889/ /pubmed/33253639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30619-7 Text en © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Articles Clark, James J Dwyer, Dominic Pinwill, Nina Clark, Peter Johnson, Peter Hackshaw, Allan The effect of clinical decision making for initiation of systemic anticancer treatments in response to the COVID-19 pandemic in England: a retrospective analysis |
title | The effect of clinical decision making for initiation of systemic anticancer treatments in response to the COVID-19 pandemic in England: a retrospective analysis |
title_full | The effect of clinical decision making for initiation of systemic anticancer treatments in response to the COVID-19 pandemic in England: a retrospective analysis |
title_fullStr | The effect of clinical decision making for initiation of systemic anticancer treatments in response to the COVID-19 pandemic in England: a retrospective analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | The effect of clinical decision making for initiation of systemic anticancer treatments in response to the COVID-19 pandemic in England: a retrospective analysis |
title_short | The effect of clinical decision making for initiation of systemic anticancer treatments in response to the COVID-19 pandemic in England: a retrospective analysis |
title_sort | effect of clinical decision making for initiation of systemic anticancer treatments in response to the covid-19 pandemic in england: a retrospective analysis |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7833889/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33253639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30619-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT clarkjamesj theeffectofclinicaldecisionmakingforinitiationofsystemicanticancertreatmentsinresponsetothecovid19pandemicinenglandaretrospectiveanalysis AT dwyerdominic theeffectofclinicaldecisionmakingforinitiationofsystemicanticancertreatmentsinresponsetothecovid19pandemicinenglandaretrospectiveanalysis AT pinwillnina theeffectofclinicaldecisionmakingforinitiationofsystemicanticancertreatmentsinresponsetothecovid19pandemicinenglandaretrospectiveanalysis AT clarkpeter theeffectofclinicaldecisionmakingforinitiationofsystemicanticancertreatmentsinresponsetothecovid19pandemicinenglandaretrospectiveanalysis AT johnsonpeter theeffectofclinicaldecisionmakingforinitiationofsystemicanticancertreatmentsinresponsetothecovid19pandemicinenglandaretrospectiveanalysis AT hackshawallan theeffectofclinicaldecisionmakingforinitiationofsystemicanticancertreatmentsinresponsetothecovid19pandemicinenglandaretrospectiveanalysis AT clarkjamesj effectofclinicaldecisionmakingforinitiationofsystemicanticancertreatmentsinresponsetothecovid19pandemicinenglandaretrospectiveanalysis AT dwyerdominic effectofclinicaldecisionmakingforinitiationofsystemicanticancertreatmentsinresponsetothecovid19pandemicinenglandaretrospectiveanalysis AT pinwillnina effectofclinicaldecisionmakingforinitiationofsystemicanticancertreatmentsinresponsetothecovid19pandemicinenglandaretrospectiveanalysis AT clarkpeter effectofclinicaldecisionmakingforinitiationofsystemicanticancertreatmentsinresponsetothecovid19pandemicinenglandaretrospectiveanalysis AT johnsonpeter effectofclinicaldecisionmakingforinitiationofsystemicanticancertreatmentsinresponsetothecovid19pandemicinenglandaretrospectiveanalysis AT hackshawallan effectofclinicaldecisionmakingforinitiationofsystemicanticancertreatmentsinresponsetothecovid19pandemicinenglandaretrospectiveanalysis |