Cargando…

The effect of clinical decision making for initiation of systemic anticancer treatments in response to the COVID-19 pandemic in England: a retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND: Cancer services worldwide had to adapt in response to the COVID-19 pandemic to minimise risk to patients and staff. We aimed to assess the national impact of COVID-19 on the prescribing of systemic anticancer treatment in England, immediately after lockdown and after the introduction of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Clark, James J, Dwyer, Dominic, Pinwill, Nina, Clark, Peter, Johnson, Peter, Hackshaw, Allan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Ltd. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7833889/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33253639
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30619-7
_version_ 1783642162703892480
author Clark, James J
Dwyer, Dominic
Pinwill, Nina
Clark, Peter
Johnson, Peter
Hackshaw, Allan
author_facet Clark, James J
Dwyer, Dominic
Pinwill, Nina
Clark, Peter
Johnson, Peter
Hackshaw, Allan
author_sort Clark, James J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cancer services worldwide had to adapt in response to the COVID-19 pandemic to minimise risk to patients and staff. We aimed to assess the national impact of COVID-19 on the prescribing of systemic anticancer treatment in England, immediately after lockdown and after the introduction of new treatments to reduce patient risk. METHODS: We did a retrospective analysis using data from a central National Health Service England web database mandated for clinicians to register intention to start all new systemic anticancer treatments approved for use in England since 2016. We analysed the monthly number of treatment registrations in April, 2020, after the implementation of societal lockdown on March 23, 2020, and after implementation of treatment options to reduce patient risk such as oral or less immunosuppressive drugs, in May and June, 2020. We compared the number of registrations in April–June, 2020, with the mean number of registrations and SD during the previous 6 months of unaffected cancer care (September, 2019, to February, 2020). We calculated the percentage change and absolute difference in SD units for the number of registrations overall, by tumour type, and by type and line of therapy. FINDINGS: In April, 2020, 2969 registrations were recorded, representing 1417 fewer registrations than in the control period (monthly mean 4386; 32% reduction, absolute difference 4·2 SDs, p<0·0001). In May, 2020, total registrations increased to 3950, representing a 10% reduction compared with the control period (absolute difference 1·3 SDs, p<0·0001). In June, 2020, 5022 registrations were recorded, representing a 15% increase compared with the control period (absolute difference 1·9 SDs; p<0·0001]). INTERPRETATION: After the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a reduction in systemic anticancer treatment initiation in England. However, following introduction of treatment options to reduce patient risk, registrations began to increase in May, 2020, and reached higher numbers than the pre-pandemic mean in June, 2020, when other clinical and societal risk mitigation factors (such as telephone consultations, facemasks and physical distancing) are likely to have contributed. However, outcomes of providing less treatment or delaying treatment initiation, particularly for advanced cancers and neoadjuvant therapies, require continued assessment. FUNDING: None.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7833889
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78338892021-01-26 The effect of clinical decision making for initiation of systemic anticancer treatments in response to the COVID-19 pandemic in England: a retrospective analysis Clark, James J Dwyer, Dominic Pinwill, Nina Clark, Peter Johnson, Peter Hackshaw, Allan Lancet Oncol Articles BACKGROUND: Cancer services worldwide had to adapt in response to the COVID-19 pandemic to minimise risk to patients and staff. We aimed to assess the national impact of COVID-19 on the prescribing of systemic anticancer treatment in England, immediately after lockdown and after the introduction of new treatments to reduce patient risk. METHODS: We did a retrospective analysis using data from a central National Health Service England web database mandated for clinicians to register intention to start all new systemic anticancer treatments approved for use in England since 2016. We analysed the monthly number of treatment registrations in April, 2020, after the implementation of societal lockdown on March 23, 2020, and after implementation of treatment options to reduce patient risk such as oral or less immunosuppressive drugs, in May and June, 2020. We compared the number of registrations in April–June, 2020, with the mean number of registrations and SD during the previous 6 months of unaffected cancer care (September, 2019, to February, 2020). We calculated the percentage change and absolute difference in SD units for the number of registrations overall, by tumour type, and by type and line of therapy. FINDINGS: In April, 2020, 2969 registrations were recorded, representing 1417 fewer registrations than in the control period (monthly mean 4386; 32% reduction, absolute difference 4·2 SDs, p<0·0001). In May, 2020, total registrations increased to 3950, representing a 10% reduction compared with the control period (absolute difference 1·3 SDs, p<0·0001). In June, 2020, 5022 registrations were recorded, representing a 15% increase compared with the control period (absolute difference 1·9 SDs; p<0·0001]). INTERPRETATION: After the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a reduction in systemic anticancer treatment initiation in England. However, following introduction of treatment options to reduce patient risk, registrations began to increase in May, 2020, and reached higher numbers than the pre-pandemic mean in June, 2020, when other clinical and societal risk mitigation factors (such as telephone consultations, facemasks and physical distancing) are likely to have contributed. However, outcomes of providing less treatment or delaying treatment initiation, particularly for advanced cancers and neoadjuvant therapies, require continued assessment. FUNDING: None. Elsevier Ltd. 2021-01 2020-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7833889/ /pubmed/33253639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30619-7 Text en © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Articles
Clark, James J
Dwyer, Dominic
Pinwill, Nina
Clark, Peter
Johnson, Peter
Hackshaw, Allan
The effect of clinical decision making for initiation of systemic anticancer treatments in response to the COVID-19 pandemic in England: a retrospective analysis
title The effect of clinical decision making for initiation of systemic anticancer treatments in response to the COVID-19 pandemic in England: a retrospective analysis
title_full The effect of clinical decision making for initiation of systemic anticancer treatments in response to the COVID-19 pandemic in England: a retrospective analysis
title_fullStr The effect of clinical decision making for initiation of systemic anticancer treatments in response to the COVID-19 pandemic in England: a retrospective analysis
title_full_unstemmed The effect of clinical decision making for initiation of systemic anticancer treatments in response to the COVID-19 pandemic in England: a retrospective analysis
title_short The effect of clinical decision making for initiation of systemic anticancer treatments in response to the COVID-19 pandemic in England: a retrospective analysis
title_sort effect of clinical decision making for initiation of systemic anticancer treatments in response to the covid-19 pandemic in england: a retrospective analysis
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7833889/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33253639
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30619-7
work_keys_str_mv AT clarkjamesj theeffectofclinicaldecisionmakingforinitiationofsystemicanticancertreatmentsinresponsetothecovid19pandemicinenglandaretrospectiveanalysis
AT dwyerdominic theeffectofclinicaldecisionmakingforinitiationofsystemicanticancertreatmentsinresponsetothecovid19pandemicinenglandaretrospectiveanalysis
AT pinwillnina theeffectofclinicaldecisionmakingforinitiationofsystemicanticancertreatmentsinresponsetothecovid19pandemicinenglandaretrospectiveanalysis
AT clarkpeter theeffectofclinicaldecisionmakingforinitiationofsystemicanticancertreatmentsinresponsetothecovid19pandemicinenglandaretrospectiveanalysis
AT johnsonpeter theeffectofclinicaldecisionmakingforinitiationofsystemicanticancertreatmentsinresponsetothecovid19pandemicinenglandaretrospectiveanalysis
AT hackshawallan theeffectofclinicaldecisionmakingforinitiationofsystemicanticancertreatmentsinresponsetothecovid19pandemicinenglandaretrospectiveanalysis
AT clarkjamesj effectofclinicaldecisionmakingforinitiationofsystemicanticancertreatmentsinresponsetothecovid19pandemicinenglandaretrospectiveanalysis
AT dwyerdominic effectofclinicaldecisionmakingforinitiationofsystemicanticancertreatmentsinresponsetothecovid19pandemicinenglandaretrospectiveanalysis
AT pinwillnina effectofclinicaldecisionmakingforinitiationofsystemicanticancertreatmentsinresponsetothecovid19pandemicinenglandaretrospectiveanalysis
AT clarkpeter effectofclinicaldecisionmakingforinitiationofsystemicanticancertreatmentsinresponsetothecovid19pandemicinenglandaretrospectiveanalysis
AT johnsonpeter effectofclinicaldecisionmakingforinitiationofsystemicanticancertreatmentsinresponsetothecovid19pandemicinenglandaretrospectiveanalysis
AT hackshawallan effectofclinicaldecisionmakingforinitiationofsystemicanticancertreatmentsinresponsetothecovid19pandemicinenglandaretrospectiveanalysis