Cargando…
Antibody response against SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and nucleoprotein evaluated by four automated immunoassays and three ELISAs
OBJECTIVES: The aim was to determine the antibody response against SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and nucleoprotein using four automated immunoassays and three ELISAs for the detection of total Ig antibodies (Roche) or IgG (Abbott, Diasorin, Snibe, Euroimmun, Mikrogen) in COVID-19 patients. METHODS: Sensi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7834107/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32745595 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2020.07.038 |
_version_ | 1783642209338261504 |
---|---|
author | Van Elslande, Jan Decru, Bram Jonckheere, Stijn Van Wijngaerden, Eric Houben, Els Vandecandelaere, Patricia Indevuyst, Christophe Depypere, Melissa Desmet, Stefanie André, Emmanuel Van Ranst, Marc Lagrou, Katrien Vermeersch, Pieter |
author_facet | Van Elslande, Jan Decru, Bram Jonckheere, Stijn Van Wijngaerden, Eric Houben, Els Vandecandelaere, Patricia Indevuyst, Christophe Depypere, Melissa Desmet, Stefanie André, Emmanuel Van Ranst, Marc Lagrou, Katrien Vermeersch, Pieter |
author_sort | Van Elslande, Jan |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The aim was to determine the antibody response against SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and nucleoprotein using four automated immunoassays and three ELISAs for the detection of total Ig antibodies (Roche) or IgG (Abbott, Diasorin, Snibe, Euroimmun, Mikrogen) in COVID-19 patients. METHODS: Sensitivity and dynamic trend to seropositivity were evaluated in 233 samples from 114 patients with moderate, severe or critical COVID-19 confirmed with PCR on nasopharyngeal swab. Specificity was evaluated in 113 samples collected before January 2020, including 24 samples from patients with non-SARS coronavirus infection. RESULTS: Sensitivity for all assays was 100% (95% confidence interval 83.7–100) 3 weeks after onset of symptoms. Specificity varied between 94.7% (88.7–97.8) and 100% (96.1–100). Calculated at the cut-offs that corresponded to a specificity of 95% and 97.5%, Roche had the highest sensitivity (85.0% (79.8–89.0) and 81.1% (76.6–85.7), p < 0.05 except vs. Abbott). Seroconversion occurred on average 2 days earlier for Roche total Ig anti-N and the three IgG anti-N assays (Abbott, Mikrogen, Euroimmun) than for the two IgG anti-S assays (Diasorin, Euroimmun) (≥50% seroconversion day 9–10 vs. day 11–12 and p < 0.05 for percent seropositive patients day 9–10 to 17–18). There was no significant difference in the IgG antibody time to seroconversion between critical and non-critical patients. DISCUSSION: Seroconversion occurred within 3 weeks after onset of symptoms with all assays and on average 2 days earlier for assays detecting IgG or total Ig anti-N than for IgG anti-S. The specificity of assays detecting anti-N was comparable to anti-S and excellent in a challenging control population. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7834107 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78341072021-01-26 Antibody response against SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and nucleoprotein evaluated by four automated immunoassays and three ELISAs Van Elslande, Jan Decru, Bram Jonckheere, Stijn Van Wijngaerden, Eric Houben, Els Vandecandelaere, Patricia Indevuyst, Christophe Depypere, Melissa Desmet, Stefanie André, Emmanuel Van Ranst, Marc Lagrou, Katrien Vermeersch, Pieter Clin Microbiol Infect Original Article OBJECTIVES: The aim was to determine the antibody response against SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and nucleoprotein using four automated immunoassays and three ELISAs for the detection of total Ig antibodies (Roche) or IgG (Abbott, Diasorin, Snibe, Euroimmun, Mikrogen) in COVID-19 patients. METHODS: Sensitivity and dynamic trend to seropositivity were evaluated in 233 samples from 114 patients with moderate, severe or critical COVID-19 confirmed with PCR on nasopharyngeal swab. Specificity was evaluated in 113 samples collected before January 2020, including 24 samples from patients with non-SARS coronavirus infection. RESULTS: Sensitivity for all assays was 100% (95% confidence interval 83.7–100) 3 weeks after onset of symptoms. Specificity varied between 94.7% (88.7–97.8) and 100% (96.1–100). Calculated at the cut-offs that corresponded to a specificity of 95% and 97.5%, Roche had the highest sensitivity (85.0% (79.8–89.0) and 81.1% (76.6–85.7), p < 0.05 except vs. Abbott). Seroconversion occurred on average 2 days earlier for Roche total Ig anti-N and the three IgG anti-N assays (Abbott, Mikrogen, Euroimmun) than for the two IgG anti-S assays (Diasorin, Euroimmun) (≥50% seroconversion day 9–10 vs. day 11–12 and p < 0.05 for percent seropositive patients day 9–10 to 17–18). There was no significant difference in the IgG antibody time to seroconversion between critical and non-critical patients. DISCUSSION: Seroconversion occurred within 3 weeks after onset of symptoms with all assays and on average 2 days earlier for assays detecting IgG or total Ig anti-N than for IgG anti-S. The specificity of assays detecting anti-N was comparable to anti-S and excellent in a challenging control population. European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2020-11 2020-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7834107/ /pubmed/32745595 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2020.07.038 Text en © 2020 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Van Elslande, Jan Decru, Bram Jonckheere, Stijn Van Wijngaerden, Eric Houben, Els Vandecandelaere, Patricia Indevuyst, Christophe Depypere, Melissa Desmet, Stefanie André, Emmanuel Van Ranst, Marc Lagrou, Katrien Vermeersch, Pieter Antibody response against SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and nucleoprotein evaluated by four automated immunoassays and three ELISAs |
title | Antibody response against SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and nucleoprotein evaluated by four automated immunoassays and three ELISAs |
title_full | Antibody response against SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and nucleoprotein evaluated by four automated immunoassays and three ELISAs |
title_fullStr | Antibody response against SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and nucleoprotein evaluated by four automated immunoassays and three ELISAs |
title_full_unstemmed | Antibody response against SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and nucleoprotein evaluated by four automated immunoassays and three ELISAs |
title_short | Antibody response against SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and nucleoprotein evaluated by four automated immunoassays and three ELISAs |
title_sort | antibody response against sars-cov-2 spike protein and nucleoprotein evaluated by four automated immunoassays and three elisas |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7834107/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32745595 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2020.07.038 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanelslandejan antibodyresponseagainstsarscov2spikeproteinandnucleoproteinevaluatedbyfourautomatedimmunoassaysandthreeelisas AT decrubram antibodyresponseagainstsarscov2spikeproteinandnucleoproteinevaluatedbyfourautomatedimmunoassaysandthreeelisas AT jonckheerestijn antibodyresponseagainstsarscov2spikeproteinandnucleoproteinevaluatedbyfourautomatedimmunoassaysandthreeelisas AT vanwijngaerdeneric antibodyresponseagainstsarscov2spikeproteinandnucleoproteinevaluatedbyfourautomatedimmunoassaysandthreeelisas AT houbenels antibodyresponseagainstsarscov2spikeproteinandnucleoproteinevaluatedbyfourautomatedimmunoassaysandthreeelisas AT vandecandelaerepatricia antibodyresponseagainstsarscov2spikeproteinandnucleoproteinevaluatedbyfourautomatedimmunoassaysandthreeelisas AT indevuystchristophe antibodyresponseagainstsarscov2spikeproteinandnucleoproteinevaluatedbyfourautomatedimmunoassaysandthreeelisas AT depyperemelissa antibodyresponseagainstsarscov2spikeproteinandnucleoproteinevaluatedbyfourautomatedimmunoassaysandthreeelisas AT desmetstefanie antibodyresponseagainstsarscov2spikeproteinandnucleoproteinevaluatedbyfourautomatedimmunoassaysandthreeelisas AT andreemmanuel antibodyresponseagainstsarscov2spikeproteinandnucleoproteinevaluatedbyfourautomatedimmunoassaysandthreeelisas AT vanranstmarc antibodyresponseagainstsarscov2spikeproteinandnucleoproteinevaluatedbyfourautomatedimmunoassaysandthreeelisas AT lagroukatrien antibodyresponseagainstsarscov2spikeproteinandnucleoproteinevaluatedbyfourautomatedimmunoassaysandthreeelisas AT vermeerschpieter antibodyresponseagainstsarscov2spikeproteinandnucleoproteinevaluatedbyfourautomatedimmunoassaysandthreeelisas |