Cargando…

Quality performance measures for small capsule endoscopy: Are the ESGE quality standards met?

Background and study aims  The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) recently issued a quality performance measures document for small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE). The aim of this nationwide survey was to explore SBCE practice with ESGE quality measures as a benchmark. Patients an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rondonotti, Emanuele, Spada, Cristiano, Cadoni, Sergio, Cannizzaro, Renato, Calabrese, Carlo, de Franchis, Roberto, Elli, Luca, Girelli, Carlo Maria, Hassan, Cesare, Marmo, Riccardo, Riccioni, Maria Elena, Oliva, Salvatore, Scarpulla, Giuseppe, Soncini, Marco, Vecchi, Maurizio, Pennazio, Marco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2021
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7834698/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33532548
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1319-0742
_version_ 1783642341934891008
author Rondonotti, Emanuele
Spada, Cristiano
Cadoni, Sergio
Cannizzaro, Renato
Calabrese, Carlo
de Franchis, Roberto
Elli, Luca
Girelli, Carlo Maria
Hassan, Cesare
Marmo, Riccardo
Riccioni, Maria Elena
Oliva, Salvatore
Scarpulla, Giuseppe
Soncini, Marco
Vecchi, Maurizio
Pennazio, Marco
author_facet Rondonotti, Emanuele
Spada, Cristiano
Cadoni, Sergio
Cannizzaro, Renato
Calabrese, Carlo
de Franchis, Roberto
Elli, Luca
Girelli, Carlo Maria
Hassan, Cesare
Marmo, Riccardo
Riccioni, Maria Elena
Oliva, Salvatore
Scarpulla, Giuseppe
Soncini, Marco
Vecchi, Maurizio
Pennazio, Marco
author_sort Rondonotti, Emanuele
collection PubMed
description Background and study aims  The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) recently issued a quality performance measures document for small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE). The aim of this nationwide survey was to explore SBCE practice with ESGE quality measures as a benchmark. Patients and methods  A dedicated per-center semi-quantitative questionnaire based on ESGE performance measures for SBCE was created by a group of SBCE experts. One-hundred-eighty-one centers were invited to participate and were asked to calculate performance measures for SBCE performed in 2018. Data were compared with 10 ESGE quality standards for both key and minor performance measures. Results  Ninety-one centers (50.3 %) participated in the data collection. Overall in the last 5 years (2014–2018), 26,615 SBCEs were performed, 5917 of which were done in 2018. Eighty percent or more of the participating centers reached the minimum standard established by the ESGE Small Bowel Working Group (ESBWG) for four performance measures (indications for SBCE, complete small bowel evaluation, diagnostic yield and retention rate). Conversely, compliance with six minimum standards established by ESBWG concerning adequate bowel preparation, patient selection, timing of SBCE in overt bleeding, appropriate reporting, reading protocols and referral to device-assisted enteroscopy was met by only 15.5 %, 10.9 %, 31.1 %, 67.7 %, 53.4 %, and 32.2 % of centers, respectively. Conclusions  The present survey shows significant variability across SBCE centers; only four (4/10: 40 %) SBCE procedural minimum standards were met by a relevant proportion of the centers ( ≥ 80 %). Our data should help in identifying target areas for quality improvement programs in SBCE.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7834698
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78346982021-02-01 Quality performance measures for small capsule endoscopy: Are the ESGE quality standards met? Rondonotti, Emanuele Spada, Cristiano Cadoni, Sergio Cannizzaro, Renato Calabrese, Carlo de Franchis, Roberto Elli, Luca Girelli, Carlo Maria Hassan, Cesare Marmo, Riccardo Riccioni, Maria Elena Oliva, Salvatore Scarpulla, Giuseppe Soncini, Marco Vecchi, Maurizio Pennazio, Marco Endosc Int Open Background and study aims  The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) recently issued a quality performance measures document for small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE). The aim of this nationwide survey was to explore SBCE practice with ESGE quality measures as a benchmark. Patients and methods  A dedicated per-center semi-quantitative questionnaire based on ESGE performance measures for SBCE was created by a group of SBCE experts. One-hundred-eighty-one centers were invited to participate and were asked to calculate performance measures for SBCE performed in 2018. Data were compared with 10 ESGE quality standards for both key and minor performance measures. Results  Ninety-one centers (50.3 %) participated in the data collection. Overall in the last 5 years (2014–2018), 26,615 SBCEs were performed, 5917 of which were done in 2018. Eighty percent or more of the participating centers reached the minimum standard established by the ESGE Small Bowel Working Group (ESBWG) for four performance measures (indications for SBCE, complete small bowel evaluation, diagnostic yield and retention rate). Conversely, compliance with six minimum standards established by ESBWG concerning adequate bowel preparation, patient selection, timing of SBCE in overt bleeding, appropriate reporting, reading protocols and referral to device-assisted enteroscopy was met by only 15.5 %, 10.9 %, 31.1 %, 67.7 %, 53.4 %, and 32.2 % of centers, respectively. Conclusions  The present survey shows significant variability across SBCE centers; only four (4/10: 40 %) SBCE procedural minimum standards were met by a relevant proportion of the centers ( ≥ 80 %). Our data should help in identifying target areas for quality improvement programs in SBCE. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2021-02 2021-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7834698/ /pubmed/33532548 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1319-0742 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Rondonotti, Emanuele
Spada, Cristiano
Cadoni, Sergio
Cannizzaro, Renato
Calabrese, Carlo
de Franchis, Roberto
Elli, Luca
Girelli, Carlo Maria
Hassan, Cesare
Marmo, Riccardo
Riccioni, Maria Elena
Oliva, Salvatore
Scarpulla, Giuseppe
Soncini, Marco
Vecchi, Maurizio
Pennazio, Marco
Quality performance measures for small capsule endoscopy: Are the ESGE quality standards met?
title Quality performance measures for small capsule endoscopy: Are the ESGE quality standards met?
title_full Quality performance measures for small capsule endoscopy: Are the ESGE quality standards met?
title_fullStr Quality performance measures for small capsule endoscopy: Are the ESGE quality standards met?
title_full_unstemmed Quality performance measures for small capsule endoscopy: Are the ESGE quality standards met?
title_short Quality performance measures for small capsule endoscopy: Are the ESGE quality standards met?
title_sort quality performance measures for small capsule endoscopy: are the esge quality standards met?
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7834698/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33532548
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1319-0742
work_keys_str_mv AT rondonottiemanuele qualityperformancemeasuresforsmallcapsuleendoscopyaretheesgequalitystandardsmet
AT spadacristiano qualityperformancemeasuresforsmallcapsuleendoscopyaretheesgequalitystandardsmet
AT cadonisergio qualityperformancemeasuresforsmallcapsuleendoscopyaretheesgequalitystandardsmet
AT cannizzarorenato qualityperformancemeasuresforsmallcapsuleendoscopyaretheesgequalitystandardsmet
AT calabresecarlo qualityperformancemeasuresforsmallcapsuleendoscopyaretheesgequalitystandardsmet
AT defranchisroberto qualityperformancemeasuresforsmallcapsuleendoscopyaretheesgequalitystandardsmet
AT elliluca qualityperformancemeasuresforsmallcapsuleendoscopyaretheesgequalitystandardsmet
AT girellicarlomaria qualityperformancemeasuresforsmallcapsuleendoscopyaretheesgequalitystandardsmet
AT hassancesare qualityperformancemeasuresforsmallcapsuleendoscopyaretheesgequalitystandardsmet
AT marmoriccardo qualityperformancemeasuresforsmallcapsuleendoscopyaretheesgequalitystandardsmet
AT riccionimariaelena qualityperformancemeasuresforsmallcapsuleendoscopyaretheesgequalitystandardsmet
AT olivasalvatore qualityperformancemeasuresforsmallcapsuleendoscopyaretheesgequalitystandardsmet
AT scarpullagiuseppe qualityperformancemeasuresforsmallcapsuleendoscopyaretheesgequalitystandardsmet
AT soncinimarco qualityperformancemeasuresforsmallcapsuleendoscopyaretheesgequalitystandardsmet
AT vecchimaurizio qualityperformancemeasuresforsmallcapsuleendoscopyaretheesgequalitystandardsmet
AT pennaziomarco qualityperformancemeasuresforsmallcapsuleendoscopyaretheesgequalitystandardsmet
AT qualityperformancemeasuresforsmallcapsuleendoscopyaretheesgequalitystandardsmet