Cargando…
Quality performance measures for small capsule endoscopy: Are the ESGE quality standards met?
Background and study aims The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) recently issued a quality performance measures document for small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE). The aim of this nationwide survey was to explore SBCE practice with ESGE quality measures as a benchmark. Patients an...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
2021
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7834698/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33532548 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1319-0742 |
_version_ | 1783642341934891008 |
---|---|
author | Rondonotti, Emanuele Spada, Cristiano Cadoni, Sergio Cannizzaro, Renato Calabrese, Carlo de Franchis, Roberto Elli, Luca Girelli, Carlo Maria Hassan, Cesare Marmo, Riccardo Riccioni, Maria Elena Oliva, Salvatore Scarpulla, Giuseppe Soncini, Marco Vecchi, Maurizio Pennazio, Marco |
author_facet | Rondonotti, Emanuele Spada, Cristiano Cadoni, Sergio Cannizzaro, Renato Calabrese, Carlo de Franchis, Roberto Elli, Luca Girelli, Carlo Maria Hassan, Cesare Marmo, Riccardo Riccioni, Maria Elena Oliva, Salvatore Scarpulla, Giuseppe Soncini, Marco Vecchi, Maurizio Pennazio, Marco |
author_sort | Rondonotti, Emanuele |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background and study aims The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) recently issued a quality performance measures document for small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE). The aim of this nationwide survey was to explore SBCE practice with ESGE quality measures as a benchmark. Patients and methods A dedicated per-center semi-quantitative questionnaire based on ESGE performance measures for SBCE was created by a group of SBCE experts. One-hundred-eighty-one centers were invited to participate and were asked to calculate performance measures for SBCE performed in 2018. Data were compared with 10 ESGE quality standards for both key and minor performance measures. Results Ninety-one centers (50.3 %) participated in the data collection. Overall in the last 5 years (2014–2018), 26,615 SBCEs were performed, 5917 of which were done in 2018. Eighty percent or more of the participating centers reached the minimum standard established by the ESGE Small Bowel Working Group (ESBWG) for four performance measures (indications for SBCE, complete small bowel evaluation, diagnostic yield and retention rate). Conversely, compliance with six minimum standards established by ESBWG concerning adequate bowel preparation, patient selection, timing of SBCE in overt bleeding, appropriate reporting, reading protocols and referral to device-assisted enteroscopy was met by only 15.5 %, 10.9 %, 31.1 %, 67.7 %, 53.4 %, and 32.2 % of centers, respectively. Conclusions The present survey shows significant variability across SBCE centers; only four (4/10: 40 %) SBCE procedural minimum standards were met by a relevant proportion of the centers ( ≥ 80 %). Our data should help in identifying target areas for quality improvement programs in SBCE. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7834698 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Georg Thieme Verlag KG |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78346982021-02-01 Quality performance measures for small capsule endoscopy: Are the ESGE quality standards met? Rondonotti, Emanuele Spada, Cristiano Cadoni, Sergio Cannizzaro, Renato Calabrese, Carlo de Franchis, Roberto Elli, Luca Girelli, Carlo Maria Hassan, Cesare Marmo, Riccardo Riccioni, Maria Elena Oliva, Salvatore Scarpulla, Giuseppe Soncini, Marco Vecchi, Maurizio Pennazio, Marco Endosc Int Open Background and study aims The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) recently issued a quality performance measures document for small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE). The aim of this nationwide survey was to explore SBCE practice with ESGE quality measures as a benchmark. Patients and methods A dedicated per-center semi-quantitative questionnaire based on ESGE performance measures for SBCE was created by a group of SBCE experts. One-hundred-eighty-one centers were invited to participate and were asked to calculate performance measures for SBCE performed in 2018. Data were compared with 10 ESGE quality standards for both key and minor performance measures. Results Ninety-one centers (50.3 %) participated in the data collection. Overall in the last 5 years (2014–2018), 26,615 SBCEs were performed, 5917 of which were done in 2018. Eighty percent or more of the participating centers reached the minimum standard established by the ESGE Small Bowel Working Group (ESBWG) for four performance measures (indications for SBCE, complete small bowel evaluation, diagnostic yield and retention rate). Conversely, compliance with six minimum standards established by ESBWG concerning adequate bowel preparation, patient selection, timing of SBCE in overt bleeding, appropriate reporting, reading protocols and referral to device-assisted enteroscopy was met by only 15.5 %, 10.9 %, 31.1 %, 67.7 %, 53.4 %, and 32.2 % of centers, respectively. Conclusions The present survey shows significant variability across SBCE centers; only four (4/10: 40 %) SBCE procedural minimum standards were met by a relevant proportion of the centers ( ≥ 80 %). Our data should help in identifying target areas for quality improvement programs in SBCE. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2021-02 2021-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7834698/ /pubmed/33532548 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1319-0742 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Rondonotti, Emanuele Spada, Cristiano Cadoni, Sergio Cannizzaro, Renato Calabrese, Carlo de Franchis, Roberto Elli, Luca Girelli, Carlo Maria Hassan, Cesare Marmo, Riccardo Riccioni, Maria Elena Oliva, Salvatore Scarpulla, Giuseppe Soncini, Marco Vecchi, Maurizio Pennazio, Marco Quality performance measures for small capsule endoscopy: Are the ESGE quality standards met? |
title | Quality performance measures for small capsule endoscopy: Are the ESGE quality standards met? |
title_full | Quality performance measures for small capsule endoscopy: Are the ESGE quality standards met? |
title_fullStr | Quality performance measures for small capsule endoscopy: Are the ESGE quality standards met? |
title_full_unstemmed | Quality performance measures for small capsule endoscopy: Are the ESGE quality standards met? |
title_short | Quality performance measures for small capsule endoscopy: Are the ESGE quality standards met? |
title_sort | quality performance measures for small capsule endoscopy: are the esge quality standards met? |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7834698/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33532548 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1319-0742 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rondonottiemanuele qualityperformancemeasuresforsmallcapsuleendoscopyaretheesgequalitystandardsmet AT spadacristiano qualityperformancemeasuresforsmallcapsuleendoscopyaretheesgequalitystandardsmet AT cadonisergio qualityperformancemeasuresforsmallcapsuleendoscopyaretheesgequalitystandardsmet AT cannizzarorenato qualityperformancemeasuresforsmallcapsuleendoscopyaretheesgequalitystandardsmet AT calabresecarlo qualityperformancemeasuresforsmallcapsuleendoscopyaretheesgequalitystandardsmet AT defranchisroberto qualityperformancemeasuresforsmallcapsuleendoscopyaretheesgequalitystandardsmet AT elliluca qualityperformancemeasuresforsmallcapsuleendoscopyaretheesgequalitystandardsmet AT girellicarlomaria qualityperformancemeasuresforsmallcapsuleendoscopyaretheesgequalitystandardsmet AT hassancesare qualityperformancemeasuresforsmallcapsuleendoscopyaretheesgequalitystandardsmet AT marmoriccardo qualityperformancemeasuresforsmallcapsuleendoscopyaretheesgequalitystandardsmet AT riccionimariaelena qualityperformancemeasuresforsmallcapsuleendoscopyaretheesgequalitystandardsmet AT olivasalvatore qualityperformancemeasuresforsmallcapsuleendoscopyaretheesgequalitystandardsmet AT scarpullagiuseppe qualityperformancemeasuresforsmallcapsuleendoscopyaretheesgequalitystandardsmet AT soncinimarco qualityperformancemeasuresforsmallcapsuleendoscopyaretheesgequalitystandardsmet AT vecchimaurizio qualityperformancemeasuresforsmallcapsuleendoscopyaretheesgequalitystandardsmet AT pennaziomarco qualityperformancemeasuresforsmallcapsuleendoscopyaretheesgequalitystandardsmet AT qualityperformancemeasuresforsmallcapsuleendoscopyaretheesgequalitystandardsmet |