Cargando…
EANM position paper on article 56 of the Council Directive 2013/59/Euratom (basic safety standards) for nuclear medicine therapy
The EC Directive 2013/59/Euratom states in article 56 that exposures of target volumes in nuclear medicine treatments shall be individually planned and their delivery appropriately verified. The Directive also mentions that medical physics experts should always be appropriately involved in those tre...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7835146/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33057773 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-020-05038-9 |
_version_ | 1783642451731283968 |
---|---|
author | Konijnenberg, Mark Herrmann, Ken Kobe, Carsten Verburg, Frederik Hindorf, Cecilia Hustinx, Roland Lassmann, Michael |
author_facet | Konijnenberg, Mark Herrmann, Ken Kobe, Carsten Verburg, Frederik Hindorf, Cecilia Hustinx, Roland Lassmann, Michael |
author_sort | Konijnenberg, Mark |
collection | PubMed |
description | The EC Directive 2013/59/Euratom states in article 56 that exposures of target volumes in nuclear medicine treatments shall be individually planned and their delivery appropriately verified. The Directive also mentions that medical physics experts should always be appropriately involved in those treatments. Although it is obvious that, in nuclear medicine practice, every nuclear medicine physician and physicist should follow national rules and legislation, the EANM considered it necessary to provide guidance on how to interpret the Directive statements for nuclear medicine treatments. Most nuclear medicine treatments currently applied in Europe are standardized. The minimum requirement for those treatments is ICRU level 1 (“activity-based prescription and patient-averaged dosimetry”), which is defined by administering the activity within 10% of the intended activity, typically according to the package insert or to the respective EANM guidelines, followed by verification of the therapy delivery, if applicable. Non-standardized treatments are essentially those in developmental phase or approved radiopharmaceuticals being used off-label with significantly (> 25% more than in the label) higher activities. These treatments should comply with ICRU level 2 (“activity-based prescription and patient-specific dosimetry”), which implies recording and reporting of the absorbed dose to organs at risk and optionally the absorbed dose to treatment regions. The EANM strongly encourages to foster research that eventually leads to treatment planning according to ICRU level 3 (“dosimetry-guided patient-specific prescription and verification”), whenever possible and relevant. Evidence for superiority of therapy prescription on basis of patient-specific dosimetry has not been obtained. However, the authors believe that a better understanding of therapy dosimetry, i.e. how much and where the energy is delivered, and radiobiology, i.e. radiation-related processes in tissues, are keys to the long-term improvement of our treatments. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7835146 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78351462021-01-29 EANM position paper on article 56 of the Council Directive 2013/59/Euratom (basic safety standards) for nuclear medicine therapy Konijnenberg, Mark Herrmann, Ken Kobe, Carsten Verburg, Frederik Hindorf, Cecilia Hustinx, Roland Lassmann, Michael Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Brief Communication The EC Directive 2013/59/Euratom states in article 56 that exposures of target volumes in nuclear medicine treatments shall be individually planned and their delivery appropriately verified. The Directive also mentions that medical physics experts should always be appropriately involved in those treatments. Although it is obvious that, in nuclear medicine practice, every nuclear medicine physician and physicist should follow national rules and legislation, the EANM considered it necessary to provide guidance on how to interpret the Directive statements for nuclear medicine treatments. Most nuclear medicine treatments currently applied in Europe are standardized. The minimum requirement for those treatments is ICRU level 1 (“activity-based prescription and patient-averaged dosimetry”), which is defined by administering the activity within 10% of the intended activity, typically according to the package insert or to the respective EANM guidelines, followed by verification of the therapy delivery, if applicable. Non-standardized treatments are essentially those in developmental phase or approved radiopharmaceuticals being used off-label with significantly (> 25% more than in the label) higher activities. These treatments should comply with ICRU level 2 (“activity-based prescription and patient-specific dosimetry”), which implies recording and reporting of the absorbed dose to organs at risk and optionally the absorbed dose to treatment regions. The EANM strongly encourages to foster research that eventually leads to treatment planning according to ICRU level 3 (“dosimetry-guided patient-specific prescription and verification”), whenever possible and relevant. Evidence for superiority of therapy prescription on basis of patient-specific dosimetry has not been obtained. However, the authors believe that a better understanding of therapy dosimetry, i.e. how much and where the energy is delivered, and radiobiology, i.e. radiation-related processes in tissues, are keys to the long-term improvement of our treatments. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-10-15 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7835146/ /pubmed/33057773 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-020-05038-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Brief Communication Konijnenberg, Mark Herrmann, Ken Kobe, Carsten Verburg, Frederik Hindorf, Cecilia Hustinx, Roland Lassmann, Michael EANM position paper on article 56 of the Council Directive 2013/59/Euratom (basic safety standards) for nuclear medicine therapy |
title | EANM position paper on article 56 of the Council Directive 2013/59/Euratom (basic safety standards) for nuclear medicine therapy |
title_full | EANM position paper on article 56 of the Council Directive 2013/59/Euratom (basic safety standards) for nuclear medicine therapy |
title_fullStr | EANM position paper on article 56 of the Council Directive 2013/59/Euratom (basic safety standards) for nuclear medicine therapy |
title_full_unstemmed | EANM position paper on article 56 of the Council Directive 2013/59/Euratom (basic safety standards) for nuclear medicine therapy |
title_short | EANM position paper on article 56 of the Council Directive 2013/59/Euratom (basic safety standards) for nuclear medicine therapy |
title_sort | eanm position paper on article 56 of the council directive 2013/59/euratom (basic safety standards) for nuclear medicine therapy |
topic | Brief Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7835146/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33057773 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-020-05038-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT konijnenbergmark eanmpositionpaperonarticle56ofthecouncildirective201359euratombasicsafetystandardsfornuclearmedicinetherapy AT herrmannken eanmpositionpaperonarticle56ofthecouncildirective201359euratombasicsafetystandardsfornuclearmedicinetherapy AT kobecarsten eanmpositionpaperonarticle56ofthecouncildirective201359euratombasicsafetystandardsfornuclearmedicinetherapy AT verburgfrederik eanmpositionpaperonarticle56ofthecouncildirective201359euratombasicsafetystandardsfornuclearmedicinetherapy AT hindorfcecilia eanmpositionpaperonarticle56ofthecouncildirective201359euratombasicsafetystandardsfornuclearmedicinetherapy AT hustinxroland eanmpositionpaperonarticle56ofthecouncildirective201359euratombasicsafetystandardsfornuclearmedicinetherapy AT lassmannmichael eanmpositionpaperonarticle56ofthecouncildirective201359euratombasicsafetystandardsfornuclearmedicinetherapy |