Cargando…

EANM position paper on article 56 of the Council Directive 2013/59/Euratom (basic safety standards) for nuclear medicine therapy

The EC Directive 2013/59/Euratom states in article 56 that exposures of target volumes in nuclear medicine treatments shall be individually planned and their delivery appropriately verified. The Directive also mentions that medical physics experts should always be appropriately involved in those tre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Konijnenberg, Mark, Herrmann, Ken, Kobe, Carsten, Verburg, Frederik, Hindorf, Cecilia, Hustinx, Roland, Lassmann, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7835146/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33057773
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-020-05038-9
_version_ 1783642451731283968
author Konijnenberg, Mark
Herrmann, Ken
Kobe, Carsten
Verburg, Frederik
Hindorf, Cecilia
Hustinx, Roland
Lassmann, Michael
author_facet Konijnenberg, Mark
Herrmann, Ken
Kobe, Carsten
Verburg, Frederik
Hindorf, Cecilia
Hustinx, Roland
Lassmann, Michael
author_sort Konijnenberg, Mark
collection PubMed
description The EC Directive 2013/59/Euratom states in article 56 that exposures of target volumes in nuclear medicine treatments shall be individually planned and their delivery appropriately verified. The Directive also mentions that medical physics experts should always be appropriately involved in those treatments. Although it is obvious that, in nuclear medicine practice, every nuclear medicine physician and physicist should follow national rules and legislation, the EANM considered it necessary to provide guidance on how to interpret the Directive statements for nuclear medicine treatments. Most nuclear medicine treatments currently applied in Europe are standardized. The minimum requirement for those treatments is ICRU level 1 (“activity-based prescription and patient-averaged dosimetry”), which is defined by administering the activity within 10% of the intended activity, typically according to the package insert or to the respective EANM guidelines, followed by verification of the therapy delivery, if applicable. Non-standardized treatments are essentially those in developmental phase or approved radiopharmaceuticals being used off-label with significantly (> 25% more than in the label) higher activities. These treatments should comply with ICRU level 2 (“activity-based prescription and patient-specific dosimetry”), which implies recording and reporting of the absorbed dose to organs at risk and optionally the absorbed dose to treatment regions. The EANM strongly encourages to foster research that eventually leads to treatment planning according to ICRU level 3 (“dosimetry-guided patient-specific prescription and verification”), whenever possible and relevant. Evidence for superiority of therapy prescription on basis of patient-specific dosimetry has not been obtained. However, the authors believe that a better understanding of therapy dosimetry, i.e. how much and where the energy is delivered, and radiobiology, i.e. radiation-related processes in tissues, are keys to the long-term improvement of our treatments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7835146
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78351462021-01-29 EANM position paper on article 56 of the Council Directive 2013/59/Euratom (basic safety standards) for nuclear medicine therapy Konijnenberg, Mark Herrmann, Ken Kobe, Carsten Verburg, Frederik Hindorf, Cecilia Hustinx, Roland Lassmann, Michael Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Brief Communication The EC Directive 2013/59/Euratom states in article 56 that exposures of target volumes in nuclear medicine treatments shall be individually planned and their delivery appropriately verified. The Directive also mentions that medical physics experts should always be appropriately involved in those treatments. Although it is obvious that, in nuclear medicine practice, every nuclear medicine physician and physicist should follow national rules and legislation, the EANM considered it necessary to provide guidance on how to interpret the Directive statements for nuclear medicine treatments. Most nuclear medicine treatments currently applied in Europe are standardized. The minimum requirement for those treatments is ICRU level 1 (“activity-based prescription and patient-averaged dosimetry”), which is defined by administering the activity within 10% of the intended activity, typically according to the package insert or to the respective EANM guidelines, followed by verification of the therapy delivery, if applicable. Non-standardized treatments are essentially those in developmental phase or approved radiopharmaceuticals being used off-label with significantly (> 25% more than in the label) higher activities. These treatments should comply with ICRU level 2 (“activity-based prescription and patient-specific dosimetry”), which implies recording and reporting of the absorbed dose to organs at risk and optionally the absorbed dose to treatment regions. The EANM strongly encourages to foster research that eventually leads to treatment planning according to ICRU level 3 (“dosimetry-guided patient-specific prescription and verification”), whenever possible and relevant. Evidence for superiority of therapy prescription on basis of patient-specific dosimetry has not been obtained. However, the authors believe that a better understanding of therapy dosimetry, i.e. how much and where the energy is delivered, and radiobiology, i.e. radiation-related processes in tissues, are keys to the long-term improvement of our treatments. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-10-15 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7835146/ /pubmed/33057773 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-020-05038-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Brief Communication
Konijnenberg, Mark
Herrmann, Ken
Kobe, Carsten
Verburg, Frederik
Hindorf, Cecilia
Hustinx, Roland
Lassmann, Michael
EANM position paper on article 56 of the Council Directive 2013/59/Euratom (basic safety standards) for nuclear medicine therapy
title EANM position paper on article 56 of the Council Directive 2013/59/Euratom (basic safety standards) for nuclear medicine therapy
title_full EANM position paper on article 56 of the Council Directive 2013/59/Euratom (basic safety standards) for nuclear medicine therapy
title_fullStr EANM position paper on article 56 of the Council Directive 2013/59/Euratom (basic safety standards) for nuclear medicine therapy
title_full_unstemmed EANM position paper on article 56 of the Council Directive 2013/59/Euratom (basic safety standards) for nuclear medicine therapy
title_short EANM position paper on article 56 of the Council Directive 2013/59/Euratom (basic safety standards) for nuclear medicine therapy
title_sort eanm position paper on article 56 of the council directive 2013/59/euratom (basic safety standards) for nuclear medicine therapy
topic Brief Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7835146/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33057773
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-020-05038-9
work_keys_str_mv AT konijnenbergmark eanmpositionpaperonarticle56ofthecouncildirective201359euratombasicsafetystandardsfornuclearmedicinetherapy
AT herrmannken eanmpositionpaperonarticle56ofthecouncildirective201359euratombasicsafetystandardsfornuclearmedicinetherapy
AT kobecarsten eanmpositionpaperonarticle56ofthecouncildirective201359euratombasicsafetystandardsfornuclearmedicinetherapy
AT verburgfrederik eanmpositionpaperonarticle56ofthecouncildirective201359euratombasicsafetystandardsfornuclearmedicinetherapy
AT hindorfcecilia eanmpositionpaperonarticle56ofthecouncildirective201359euratombasicsafetystandardsfornuclearmedicinetherapy
AT hustinxroland eanmpositionpaperonarticle56ofthecouncildirective201359euratombasicsafetystandardsfornuclearmedicinetherapy
AT lassmannmichael eanmpositionpaperonarticle56ofthecouncildirective201359euratombasicsafetystandardsfornuclearmedicinetherapy