Cargando…
Consensus statements on PSMA PET/CT response assessment criteria in prostate cancer
PURPOSE: Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) is used for (re)staging prostate cancer (PCa) and as a biomarker for evaluating response to therapy, but lacks established response criteria. A panel of PCa experts in nuclear medicine, rad...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7835167/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32617640 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-020-04934-4 |
_version_ | 1783642456701534208 |
---|---|
author | Fanti, Stefano Goffin, Karolien Hadaschik, Boris A Herrmann, Ken Maurer, Tobias MacLennan, Steven Oprea-Lager, Daniela E. Oyen, Wim JG Rouvière, Olivier Mottet, Nicolas Bjartell, Anders |
author_facet | Fanti, Stefano Goffin, Karolien Hadaschik, Boris A Herrmann, Ken Maurer, Tobias MacLennan, Steven Oprea-Lager, Daniela E. Oyen, Wim JG Rouvière, Olivier Mottet, Nicolas Bjartell, Anders |
author_sort | Fanti, Stefano |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) is used for (re)staging prostate cancer (PCa) and as a biomarker for evaluating response to therapy, but lacks established response criteria. A panel of PCa experts in nuclear medicine, radiology, and/or urology met on February 21, 2020, in Amsterdam, The Netherlands, to formulate criteria for PSMA PET/CT-based response in patients treated for metastatic PCa and optimal timing to use it. METHODS: Panelists received thematic topics and relevant literature prior to the meeting. Statements on how to interpret response and progression on therapy in PCa with PSMA PET/CT and when to use it were developed. Panelists voted anonymously on a nine-point scale, ranging from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (9). Median scores described agreement and consensus. RESULTS: PSMA PET/CT consensus statements concerned utility, best timing for performing, criteria for evaluation of response, patients who could benefit, and handling of radiolabeled PSMA PET tracers. Consensus was reached on all statements. PSMA PET/CT can be used before and after any local and systemic treatment in patients with metastatic disease to evaluate response to treatment. Ideally, PSMA PET/CT imaging criteria should categorize patients as responders, patients with stable disease, partial response, and complete response, or as non-responders. Specific clinical scenarios such as oligometastatic or polymetastatic disease deserve special consideration. CONCLUSIONS: Adoption of PSMA PET/CT should be supported by indication for appropriate use and precise criteria for interpretation. PSMA PET/CT criteria should categorize patients as responders or non-responders. Specific clinical scenarios deserve special consideration. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7835167 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78351672021-01-29 Consensus statements on PSMA PET/CT response assessment criteria in prostate cancer Fanti, Stefano Goffin, Karolien Hadaschik, Boris A Herrmann, Ken Maurer, Tobias MacLennan, Steven Oprea-Lager, Daniela E. Oyen, Wim JG Rouvière, Olivier Mottet, Nicolas Bjartell, Anders Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Original Article PURPOSE: Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) is used for (re)staging prostate cancer (PCa) and as a biomarker for evaluating response to therapy, but lacks established response criteria. A panel of PCa experts in nuclear medicine, radiology, and/or urology met on February 21, 2020, in Amsterdam, The Netherlands, to formulate criteria for PSMA PET/CT-based response in patients treated for metastatic PCa and optimal timing to use it. METHODS: Panelists received thematic topics and relevant literature prior to the meeting. Statements on how to interpret response and progression on therapy in PCa with PSMA PET/CT and when to use it were developed. Panelists voted anonymously on a nine-point scale, ranging from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (9). Median scores described agreement and consensus. RESULTS: PSMA PET/CT consensus statements concerned utility, best timing for performing, criteria for evaluation of response, patients who could benefit, and handling of radiolabeled PSMA PET tracers. Consensus was reached on all statements. PSMA PET/CT can be used before and after any local and systemic treatment in patients with metastatic disease to evaluate response to treatment. Ideally, PSMA PET/CT imaging criteria should categorize patients as responders, patients with stable disease, partial response, and complete response, or as non-responders. Specific clinical scenarios such as oligometastatic or polymetastatic disease deserve special consideration. CONCLUSIONS: Adoption of PSMA PET/CT should be supported by indication for appropriate use and precise criteria for interpretation. PSMA PET/CT criteria should categorize patients as responders or non-responders. Specific clinical scenarios deserve special consideration. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-07-02 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7835167/ /pubmed/32617640 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-020-04934-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Fanti, Stefano Goffin, Karolien Hadaschik, Boris A Herrmann, Ken Maurer, Tobias MacLennan, Steven Oprea-Lager, Daniela E. Oyen, Wim JG Rouvière, Olivier Mottet, Nicolas Bjartell, Anders Consensus statements on PSMA PET/CT response assessment criteria in prostate cancer |
title | Consensus statements on PSMA PET/CT response assessment criteria in prostate cancer |
title_full | Consensus statements on PSMA PET/CT response assessment criteria in prostate cancer |
title_fullStr | Consensus statements on PSMA PET/CT response assessment criteria in prostate cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Consensus statements on PSMA PET/CT response assessment criteria in prostate cancer |
title_short | Consensus statements on PSMA PET/CT response assessment criteria in prostate cancer |
title_sort | consensus statements on psma pet/ct response assessment criteria in prostate cancer |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7835167/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32617640 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-020-04934-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fantistefano consensusstatementsonpsmapetctresponseassessmentcriteriainprostatecancer AT goffinkarolien consensusstatementsonpsmapetctresponseassessmentcriteriainprostatecancer AT hadaschikborisa consensusstatementsonpsmapetctresponseassessmentcriteriainprostatecancer AT herrmannken consensusstatementsonpsmapetctresponseassessmentcriteriainprostatecancer AT maurertobias consensusstatementsonpsmapetctresponseassessmentcriteriainprostatecancer AT maclennansteven consensusstatementsonpsmapetctresponseassessmentcriteriainprostatecancer AT oprealagerdanielae consensusstatementsonpsmapetctresponseassessmentcriteriainprostatecancer AT oyenwimjg consensusstatementsonpsmapetctresponseassessmentcriteriainprostatecancer AT rouviereolivier consensusstatementsonpsmapetctresponseassessmentcriteriainprostatecancer AT mottetnicolas consensusstatementsonpsmapetctresponseassessmentcriteriainprostatecancer AT bjartellanders consensusstatementsonpsmapetctresponseassessmentcriteriainprostatecancer |