Cargando…

Consensus statements on PSMA PET/CT response assessment criteria in prostate cancer

PURPOSE: Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) is used for (re)staging prostate cancer (PCa) and as a biomarker for evaluating response to therapy, but lacks established response criteria. A panel of PCa experts in nuclear medicine, rad...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fanti, Stefano, Goffin, Karolien, Hadaschik, Boris A, Herrmann, Ken, Maurer, Tobias, MacLennan, Steven, Oprea-Lager, Daniela E., Oyen, Wim JG, Rouvière, Olivier, Mottet, Nicolas, Bjartell, Anders
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7835167/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32617640
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-020-04934-4
_version_ 1783642456701534208
author Fanti, Stefano
Goffin, Karolien
Hadaschik, Boris A
Herrmann, Ken
Maurer, Tobias
MacLennan, Steven
Oprea-Lager, Daniela E.
Oyen, Wim JG
Rouvière, Olivier
Mottet, Nicolas
Bjartell, Anders
author_facet Fanti, Stefano
Goffin, Karolien
Hadaschik, Boris A
Herrmann, Ken
Maurer, Tobias
MacLennan, Steven
Oprea-Lager, Daniela E.
Oyen, Wim JG
Rouvière, Olivier
Mottet, Nicolas
Bjartell, Anders
author_sort Fanti, Stefano
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) is used for (re)staging prostate cancer (PCa) and as a biomarker for evaluating response to therapy, but lacks established response criteria. A panel of PCa experts in nuclear medicine, radiology, and/or urology met on February 21, 2020, in Amsterdam, The Netherlands, to formulate criteria for PSMA PET/CT-based response in patients treated for metastatic PCa and optimal timing to use it. METHODS: Panelists received thematic topics and relevant literature prior to the meeting. Statements on how to interpret response and progression on therapy in PCa with PSMA PET/CT and when to use it were developed. Panelists voted anonymously on a nine-point scale, ranging from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (9). Median scores described agreement and consensus. RESULTS: PSMA PET/CT consensus statements concerned utility, best timing for performing, criteria for evaluation of response, patients who could benefit, and handling of radiolabeled PSMA PET tracers. Consensus was reached on all statements. PSMA PET/CT can be used before and after any local and systemic treatment in patients with metastatic disease to evaluate response to treatment. Ideally, PSMA PET/CT imaging criteria should categorize patients as responders, patients with stable disease, partial response, and complete response, or as non-responders. Specific clinical scenarios such as oligometastatic or polymetastatic disease deserve special consideration. CONCLUSIONS: Adoption of PSMA PET/CT should be supported by indication for appropriate use and precise criteria for interpretation. PSMA PET/CT criteria should categorize patients as responders or non-responders. Specific clinical scenarios deserve special consideration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7835167
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78351672021-01-29 Consensus statements on PSMA PET/CT response assessment criteria in prostate cancer Fanti, Stefano Goffin, Karolien Hadaschik, Boris A Herrmann, Ken Maurer, Tobias MacLennan, Steven Oprea-Lager, Daniela E. Oyen, Wim JG Rouvière, Olivier Mottet, Nicolas Bjartell, Anders Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Original Article PURPOSE: Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) is used for (re)staging prostate cancer (PCa) and as a biomarker for evaluating response to therapy, but lacks established response criteria. A panel of PCa experts in nuclear medicine, radiology, and/or urology met on February 21, 2020, in Amsterdam, The Netherlands, to formulate criteria for PSMA PET/CT-based response in patients treated for metastatic PCa and optimal timing to use it. METHODS: Panelists received thematic topics and relevant literature prior to the meeting. Statements on how to interpret response and progression on therapy in PCa with PSMA PET/CT and when to use it were developed. Panelists voted anonymously on a nine-point scale, ranging from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (9). Median scores described agreement and consensus. RESULTS: PSMA PET/CT consensus statements concerned utility, best timing for performing, criteria for evaluation of response, patients who could benefit, and handling of radiolabeled PSMA PET tracers. Consensus was reached on all statements. PSMA PET/CT can be used before and after any local and systemic treatment in patients with metastatic disease to evaluate response to treatment. Ideally, PSMA PET/CT imaging criteria should categorize patients as responders, patients with stable disease, partial response, and complete response, or as non-responders. Specific clinical scenarios such as oligometastatic or polymetastatic disease deserve special consideration. CONCLUSIONS: Adoption of PSMA PET/CT should be supported by indication for appropriate use and precise criteria for interpretation. PSMA PET/CT criteria should categorize patients as responders or non-responders. Specific clinical scenarios deserve special consideration. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-07-02 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7835167/ /pubmed/32617640 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-020-04934-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Fanti, Stefano
Goffin, Karolien
Hadaschik, Boris A
Herrmann, Ken
Maurer, Tobias
MacLennan, Steven
Oprea-Lager, Daniela E.
Oyen, Wim JG
Rouvière, Olivier
Mottet, Nicolas
Bjartell, Anders
Consensus statements on PSMA PET/CT response assessment criteria in prostate cancer
title Consensus statements on PSMA PET/CT response assessment criteria in prostate cancer
title_full Consensus statements on PSMA PET/CT response assessment criteria in prostate cancer
title_fullStr Consensus statements on PSMA PET/CT response assessment criteria in prostate cancer
title_full_unstemmed Consensus statements on PSMA PET/CT response assessment criteria in prostate cancer
title_short Consensus statements on PSMA PET/CT response assessment criteria in prostate cancer
title_sort consensus statements on psma pet/ct response assessment criteria in prostate cancer
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7835167/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32617640
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-020-04934-4
work_keys_str_mv AT fantistefano consensusstatementsonpsmapetctresponseassessmentcriteriainprostatecancer
AT goffinkarolien consensusstatementsonpsmapetctresponseassessmentcriteriainprostatecancer
AT hadaschikborisa consensusstatementsonpsmapetctresponseassessmentcriteriainprostatecancer
AT herrmannken consensusstatementsonpsmapetctresponseassessmentcriteriainprostatecancer
AT maurertobias consensusstatementsonpsmapetctresponseassessmentcriteriainprostatecancer
AT maclennansteven consensusstatementsonpsmapetctresponseassessmentcriteriainprostatecancer
AT oprealagerdanielae consensusstatementsonpsmapetctresponseassessmentcriteriainprostatecancer
AT oyenwimjg consensusstatementsonpsmapetctresponseassessmentcriteriainprostatecancer
AT rouviereolivier consensusstatementsonpsmapetctresponseassessmentcriteriainprostatecancer
AT mottetnicolas consensusstatementsonpsmapetctresponseassessmentcriteriainprostatecancer
AT bjartellanders consensusstatementsonpsmapetctresponseassessmentcriteriainprostatecancer