Cargando…

Comparison of Therapies in MS Patients After the First Demyelinating Event in Real Clinical Practice in the Czech Republic: Data From the National Registry ReMuS

Background: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory and neurodegenerative disease of the central nervous system. Well-established drugs used for MS patients after the first demyelinating event in the Czech Republic include glatiramer acetate (GA), interferon beta-1a (IFNβ-1a), IFN beta-1b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pavelek, Zbyšek, Sobíšek, Lukáš, Šarláková, Jana, Potužník, Pavel, Peterka, Marek, Štětkárová, Ivana, Štourač, Pavel, Mareš, Jan, Hradílek, Pavel, Ampapa, Radek, Grünermelová, Markéta, Vachová, Marta, Recmanová, Eva, Angelucci, Francesco, Halúsková, Simona, Vališ, Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7835499/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33510704
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.593527
_version_ 1783642540279332864
author Pavelek, Zbyšek
Sobíšek, Lukáš
Šarláková, Jana
Potužník, Pavel
Peterka, Marek
Štětkárová, Ivana
Štourač, Pavel
Mareš, Jan
Hradílek, Pavel
Ampapa, Radek
Grünermelová, Markéta
Vachová, Marta
Recmanová, Eva
Angelucci, Francesco
Halúsková, Simona
Vališ, Martin
author_facet Pavelek, Zbyšek
Sobíšek, Lukáš
Šarláková, Jana
Potužník, Pavel
Peterka, Marek
Štětkárová, Ivana
Štourač, Pavel
Mareš, Jan
Hradílek, Pavel
Ampapa, Radek
Grünermelová, Markéta
Vachová, Marta
Recmanová, Eva
Angelucci, Francesco
Halúsková, Simona
Vališ, Martin
author_sort Pavelek, Zbyšek
collection PubMed
description Background: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory and neurodegenerative disease of the central nervous system. Well-established drugs used for MS patients after the first demyelinating event in the Czech Republic include glatiramer acetate (GA), interferon beta-1a (IFNβ-1a), IFN beta-1b (IFNβ-1b), peginterferon beta-1a (peg-IFNβ-1a), and teriflunomide. Objective: The objective of this observational study was to compare the effectiveness of the abovementioned drugs in patients with MS who initiated their therapy after the first demyelinating event. Patients were followed for up to 2 years in real clinical practice in the Czech Republic. Methods: A total of 1,654 MS patients treated after the first demyelinating event and followed up for 2 years were enrolled. Evaluation parameters (endpoints) included the annualized relapse rate (ARR), time to next relapse, change in the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score, and time of confirmed disease progression (CDP). When patients ended the therapy before the observational period, the reason for ending the therapy among different treatments was compared. Results: No significant difference was found among the groups of patients treated with IFNβ-1a/1b, GA, or teriflunomide for the following parameters: time to the first relapse, change in the EDSS score, and the proportion of patients with CDP. Compared to IFNβ-1a (44 mcg), a significant increase in the percentage of relapse-free patients was found for GA, but this treatment effect was not confirmed by the validation analysis. Compared to the other drugs, there was a significant difference in the reasons for terminating GA therapy. Conclusion: Small differences were found among GA, IFNβ and teriflunomide therapies, with no significant impact on the final outcome after 2 years. Therefore, in clinical practice, we recommend choosing the drug based on individual potential risk from long-term therapy and on patient preferences and clinical characteristics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7835499
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78354992021-01-27 Comparison of Therapies in MS Patients After the First Demyelinating Event in Real Clinical Practice in the Czech Republic: Data From the National Registry ReMuS Pavelek, Zbyšek Sobíšek, Lukáš Šarláková, Jana Potužník, Pavel Peterka, Marek Štětkárová, Ivana Štourač, Pavel Mareš, Jan Hradílek, Pavel Ampapa, Radek Grünermelová, Markéta Vachová, Marta Recmanová, Eva Angelucci, Francesco Halúsková, Simona Vališ, Martin Front Neurol Neurology Background: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory and neurodegenerative disease of the central nervous system. Well-established drugs used for MS patients after the first demyelinating event in the Czech Republic include glatiramer acetate (GA), interferon beta-1a (IFNβ-1a), IFN beta-1b (IFNβ-1b), peginterferon beta-1a (peg-IFNβ-1a), and teriflunomide. Objective: The objective of this observational study was to compare the effectiveness of the abovementioned drugs in patients with MS who initiated their therapy after the first demyelinating event. Patients were followed for up to 2 years in real clinical practice in the Czech Republic. Methods: A total of 1,654 MS patients treated after the first demyelinating event and followed up for 2 years were enrolled. Evaluation parameters (endpoints) included the annualized relapse rate (ARR), time to next relapse, change in the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score, and time of confirmed disease progression (CDP). When patients ended the therapy before the observational period, the reason for ending the therapy among different treatments was compared. Results: No significant difference was found among the groups of patients treated with IFNβ-1a/1b, GA, or teriflunomide for the following parameters: time to the first relapse, change in the EDSS score, and the proportion of patients with CDP. Compared to IFNβ-1a (44 mcg), a significant increase in the percentage of relapse-free patients was found for GA, but this treatment effect was not confirmed by the validation analysis. Compared to the other drugs, there was a significant difference in the reasons for terminating GA therapy. Conclusion: Small differences were found among GA, IFNβ and teriflunomide therapies, with no significant impact on the final outcome after 2 years. Therefore, in clinical practice, we recommend choosing the drug based on individual potential risk from long-term therapy and on patient preferences and clinical characteristics. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-01-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7835499/ /pubmed/33510704 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.593527 Text en Copyright © 2021 Pavelek, Sobíšek, Šarláková, Potužník, Peterka, Štětkárová, Štourač, Mareš, Hradílek, Ampapa, Grünermelová, Vachová, Recmanová, Angelucci, Halúsková and Vališ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neurology
Pavelek, Zbyšek
Sobíšek, Lukáš
Šarláková, Jana
Potužník, Pavel
Peterka, Marek
Štětkárová, Ivana
Štourač, Pavel
Mareš, Jan
Hradílek, Pavel
Ampapa, Radek
Grünermelová, Markéta
Vachová, Marta
Recmanová, Eva
Angelucci, Francesco
Halúsková, Simona
Vališ, Martin
Comparison of Therapies in MS Patients After the First Demyelinating Event in Real Clinical Practice in the Czech Republic: Data From the National Registry ReMuS
title Comparison of Therapies in MS Patients After the First Demyelinating Event in Real Clinical Practice in the Czech Republic: Data From the National Registry ReMuS
title_full Comparison of Therapies in MS Patients After the First Demyelinating Event in Real Clinical Practice in the Czech Republic: Data From the National Registry ReMuS
title_fullStr Comparison of Therapies in MS Patients After the First Demyelinating Event in Real Clinical Practice in the Czech Republic: Data From the National Registry ReMuS
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Therapies in MS Patients After the First Demyelinating Event in Real Clinical Practice in the Czech Republic: Data From the National Registry ReMuS
title_short Comparison of Therapies in MS Patients After the First Demyelinating Event in Real Clinical Practice in the Czech Republic: Data From the National Registry ReMuS
title_sort comparison of therapies in ms patients after the first demyelinating event in real clinical practice in the czech republic: data from the national registry remus
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7835499/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33510704
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.593527
work_keys_str_mv AT pavelekzbysek comparisonoftherapiesinmspatientsafterthefirstdemyelinatingeventinrealclinicalpracticeintheczechrepublicdatafromthenationalregistryremus
AT sobiseklukas comparisonoftherapiesinmspatientsafterthefirstdemyelinatingeventinrealclinicalpracticeintheczechrepublicdatafromthenationalregistryremus
AT sarlakovajana comparisonoftherapiesinmspatientsafterthefirstdemyelinatingeventinrealclinicalpracticeintheczechrepublicdatafromthenationalregistryremus
AT potuznikpavel comparisonoftherapiesinmspatientsafterthefirstdemyelinatingeventinrealclinicalpracticeintheczechrepublicdatafromthenationalregistryremus
AT peterkamarek comparisonoftherapiesinmspatientsafterthefirstdemyelinatingeventinrealclinicalpracticeintheczechrepublicdatafromthenationalregistryremus
AT stetkarovaivana comparisonoftherapiesinmspatientsafterthefirstdemyelinatingeventinrealclinicalpracticeintheczechrepublicdatafromthenationalregistryremus
AT stouracpavel comparisonoftherapiesinmspatientsafterthefirstdemyelinatingeventinrealclinicalpracticeintheczechrepublicdatafromthenationalregistryremus
AT maresjan comparisonoftherapiesinmspatientsafterthefirstdemyelinatingeventinrealclinicalpracticeintheczechrepublicdatafromthenationalregistryremus
AT hradilekpavel comparisonoftherapiesinmspatientsafterthefirstdemyelinatingeventinrealclinicalpracticeintheczechrepublicdatafromthenationalregistryremus
AT ampaparadek comparisonoftherapiesinmspatientsafterthefirstdemyelinatingeventinrealclinicalpracticeintheczechrepublicdatafromthenationalregistryremus
AT grunermelovamarketa comparisonoftherapiesinmspatientsafterthefirstdemyelinatingeventinrealclinicalpracticeintheczechrepublicdatafromthenationalregistryremus
AT vachovamarta comparisonoftherapiesinmspatientsafterthefirstdemyelinatingeventinrealclinicalpracticeintheczechrepublicdatafromthenationalregistryremus
AT recmanovaeva comparisonoftherapiesinmspatientsafterthefirstdemyelinatingeventinrealclinicalpracticeintheczechrepublicdatafromthenationalregistryremus
AT angeluccifrancesco comparisonoftherapiesinmspatientsafterthefirstdemyelinatingeventinrealclinicalpracticeintheczechrepublicdatafromthenationalregistryremus
AT haluskovasimona comparisonoftherapiesinmspatientsafterthefirstdemyelinatingeventinrealclinicalpracticeintheczechrepublicdatafromthenationalregistryremus
AT valismartin comparisonoftherapiesinmspatientsafterthefirstdemyelinatingeventinrealclinicalpracticeintheczechrepublicdatafromthenationalregistryremus