Cargando…
Rationale and methods of a randomized trial evaluating the effect of neprilysin inhibition on left ventricular remodelling
AIMS: In patients at high risk of heart failure following myocardial infarction (MI) as a result of residual left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD), the angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor sacubitril/valsartan may result in a greater attenuation of adverse left ventricular (LV) remodelli...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7835504/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33305513 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.13137 |
_version_ | 1783642541468418048 |
---|---|
author | Docherty, Kieran F. Campbell, Ross T. Brooksbank, Katriona J.M. Godeseth, Rosemary L. Forsyth, Paul McConnachie, Alex Roditi, Giles Stanley, Bethany Welsh, Paul Jhund, Pardeep S. Petrie, Mark C. McMurray, John J.V. |
author_facet | Docherty, Kieran F. Campbell, Ross T. Brooksbank, Katriona J.M. Godeseth, Rosemary L. Forsyth, Paul McConnachie, Alex Roditi, Giles Stanley, Bethany Welsh, Paul Jhund, Pardeep S. Petrie, Mark C. McMurray, John J.V. |
author_sort | Docherty, Kieran F. |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: In patients at high risk of heart failure following myocardial infarction (MI) as a result of residual left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD), the angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor sacubitril/valsartan may result in a greater attenuation of adverse left ventricular (LV) remodelling than renin angiotensin aldosterone system inhibition alone, due to increased levels of substrates for neprilysin with vasodilatory, anti‐hypertrophic, anti‐fibrotic, and sympatholytic effects. METHODS: We designed a randomized, double‐blinded, active‐comparator trial to examine the effect of sacubitril/valsartan to the current standard of care in reducing adverse LV remodelling in patients with asymptomatic LVSD following MI. Eligible patients were ≥3 months following MI, had an LV ejection fraction ≤40% as measured by echocardiography, were New York Heart Association functional classification I, tolerant of an angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker at equivalent dose of ramipril 2.5 mg twice daily or greater, and taking a beta‐blocker unless contraindicated or intolerant. Patients were randomized to sacubitril/valsartan (target dose 97/103 mg twice daily) or valsartan (target dose 160 mg twice daily). The primary endpoint will be change in LV end‐systolic volume indexed for body surface area measured using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging over 52 weeks from randomization. Secondary endpoints include other magnetic resonance imaging‐based metrics of LV remodelling, biomarkers associated with LV remodelling and neurohumoral activation, and change in patient well‐being assessed using a patient global assessment questionnaire. CONCLUSIONS: This trial will investigate the effect of neprilysin inhibition on LV remodelling and the neurohumoral actions of sacubitril/valsartan in patients with asymptomatic LVSD following MI. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7835504 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78355042021-02-01 Rationale and methods of a randomized trial evaluating the effect of neprilysin inhibition on left ventricular remodelling Docherty, Kieran F. Campbell, Ross T. Brooksbank, Katriona J.M. Godeseth, Rosemary L. Forsyth, Paul McConnachie, Alex Roditi, Giles Stanley, Bethany Welsh, Paul Jhund, Pardeep S. Petrie, Mark C. McMurray, John J.V. ESC Heart Fail Original Research Articles AIMS: In patients at high risk of heart failure following myocardial infarction (MI) as a result of residual left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD), the angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor sacubitril/valsartan may result in a greater attenuation of adverse left ventricular (LV) remodelling than renin angiotensin aldosterone system inhibition alone, due to increased levels of substrates for neprilysin with vasodilatory, anti‐hypertrophic, anti‐fibrotic, and sympatholytic effects. METHODS: We designed a randomized, double‐blinded, active‐comparator trial to examine the effect of sacubitril/valsartan to the current standard of care in reducing adverse LV remodelling in patients with asymptomatic LVSD following MI. Eligible patients were ≥3 months following MI, had an LV ejection fraction ≤40% as measured by echocardiography, were New York Heart Association functional classification I, tolerant of an angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker at equivalent dose of ramipril 2.5 mg twice daily or greater, and taking a beta‐blocker unless contraindicated or intolerant. Patients were randomized to sacubitril/valsartan (target dose 97/103 mg twice daily) or valsartan (target dose 160 mg twice daily). The primary endpoint will be change in LV end‐systolic volume indexed for body surface area measured using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging over 52 weeks from randomization. Secondary endpoints include other magnetic resonance imaging‐based metrics of LV remodelling, biomarkers associated with LV remodelling and neurohumoral activation, and change in patient well‐being assessed using a patient global assessment questionnaire. CONCLUSIONS: This trial will investigate the effect of neprilysin inhibition on LV remodelling and the neurohumoral actions of sacubitril/valsartan in patients with asymptomatic LVSD following MI. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7835504/ /pubmed/33305513 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.13137 Text en © 2020 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Articles Docherty, Kieran F. Campbell, Ross T. Brooksbank, Katriona J.M. Godeseth, Rosemary L. Forsyth, Paul McConnachie, Alex Roditi, Giles Stanley, Bethany Welsh, Paul Jhund, Pardeep S. Petrie, Mark C. McMurray, John J.V. Rationale and methods of a randomized trial evaluating the effect of neprilysin inhibition on left ventricular remodelling |
title | Rationale and methods of a randomized trial evaluating the effect of neprilysin inhibition on left ventricular remodelling |
title_full | Rationale and methods of a randomized trial evaluating the effect of neprilysin inhibition on left ventricular remodelling |
title_fullStr | Rationale and methods of a randomized trial evaluating the effect of neprilysin inhibition on left ventricular remodelling |
title_full_unstemmed | Rationale and methods of a randomized trial evaluating the effect of neprilysin inhibition on left ventricular remodelling |
title_short | Rationale and methods of a randomized trial evaluating the effect of neprilysin inhibition on left ventricular remodelling |
title_sort | rationale and methods of a randomized trial evaluating the effect of neprilysin inhibition on left ventricular remodelling |
topic | Original Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7835504/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33305513 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.13137 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dochertykieranf rationaleandmethodsofarandomizedtrialevaluatingtheeffectofneprilysininhibitiononleftventricularremodelling AT campbellrosst rationaleandmethodsofarandomizedtrialevaluatingtheeffectofneprilysininhibitiononleftventricularremodelling AT brooksbankkatrionajm rationaleandmethodsofarandomizedtrialevaluatingtheeffectofneprilysininhibitiononleftventricularremodelling AT godesethrosemaryl rationaleandmethodsofarandomizedtrialevaluatingtheeffectofneprilysininhibitiononleftventricularremodelling AT forsythpaul rationaleandmethodsofarandomizedtrialevaluatingtheeffectofneprilysininhibitiononleftventricularremodelling AT mcconnachiealex rationaleandmethodsofarandomizedtrialevaluatingtheeffectofneprilysininhibitiononleftventricularremodelling AT roditigiles rationaleandmethodsofarandomizedtrialevaluatingtheeffectofneprilysininhibitiononleftventricularremodelling AT stanleybethany rationaleandmethodsofarandomizedtrialevaluatingtheeffectofneprilysininhibitiononleftventricularremodelling AT welshpaul rationaleandmethodsofarandomizedtrialevaluatingtheeffectofneprilysininhibitiononleftventricularremodelling AT jhundpardeeps rationaleandmethodsofarandomizedtrialevaluatingtheeffectofneprilysininhibitiononleftventricularremodelling AT petriemarkc rationaleandmethodsofarandomizedtrialevaluatingtheeffectofneprilysininhibitiononleftventricularremodelling AT mcmurrayjohnjv rationaleandmethodsofarandomizedtrialevaluatingtheeffectofneprilysininhibitiononleftventricularremodelling |