Cargando…

Rationale and methods of a randomized trial evaluating the effect of neprilysin inhibition on left ventricular remodelling

AIMS: In patients at high risk of heart failure following myocardial infarction (MI) as a result of residual left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD), the angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor sacubitril/valsartan may result in a greater attenuation of adverse left ventricular (LV) remodelli...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Docherty, Kieran F., Campbell, Ross T., Brooksbank, Katriona J.M., Godeseth, Rosemary L., Forsyth, Paul, McConnachie, Alex, Roditi, Giles, Stanley, Bethany, Welsh, Paul, Jhund, Pardeep S., Petrie, Mark C., McMurray, John J.V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7835504/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33305513
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.13137
_version_ 1783642541468418048
author Docherty, Kieran F.
Campbell, Ross T.
Brooksbank, Katriona J.M.
Godeseth, Rosemary L.
Forsyth, Paul
McConnachie, Alex
Roditi, Giles
Stanley, Bethany
Welsh, Paul
Jhund, Pardeep S.
Petrie, Mark C.
McMurray, John J.V.
author_facet Docherty, Kieran F.
Campbell, Ross T.
Brooksbank, Katriona J.M.
Godeseth, Rosemary L.
Forsyth, Paul
McConnachie, Alex
Roditi, Giles
Stanley, Bethany
Welsh, Paul
Jhund, Pardeep S.
Petrie, Mark C.
McMurray, John J.V.
author_sort Docherty, Kieran F.
collection PubMed
description AIMS: In patients at high risk of heart failure following myocardial infarction (MI) as a result of residual left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD), the angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor sacubitril/valsartan may result in a greater attenuation of adverse left ventricular (LV) remodelling than renin angiotensin aldosterone system inhibition alone, due to increased levels of substrates for neprilysin with vasodilatory, anti‐hypertrophic, anti‐fibrotic, and sympatholytic effects. METHODS: We designed a randomized, double‐blinded, active‐comparator trial to examine the effect of sacubitril/valsartan to the current standard of care in reducing adverse LV remodelling in patients with asymptomatic LVSD following MI. Eligible patients were ≥3 months following MI, had an LV ejection fraction ≤40% as measured by echocardiography, were New York Heart Association functional classification I, tolerant of an angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker at equivalent dose of ramipril 2.5 mg twice daily or greater, and taking a beta‐blocker unless contraindicated or intolerant. Patients were randomized to sacubitril/valsartan (target dose 97/103 mg twice daily) or valsartan (target dose 160 mg twice daily). The primary endpoint will be change in LV end‐systolic volume indexed for body surface area measured using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging over 52 weeks from randomization. Secondary endpoints include other magnetic resonance imaging‐based metrics of LV remodelling, biomarkers associated with LV remodelling and neurohumoral activation, and change in patient well‐being assessed using a patient global assessment questionnaire. CONCLUSIONS: This trial will investigate the effect of neprilysin inhibition on LV remodelling and the neurohumoral actions of sacubitril/valsartan in patients with asymptomatic LVSD following MI.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7835504
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78355042021-02-01 Rationale and methods of a randomized trial evaluating the effect of neprilysin inhibition on left ventricular remodelling Docherty, Kieran F. Campbell, Ross T. Brooksbank, Katriona J.M. Godeseth, Rosemary L. Forsyth, Paul McConnachie, Alex Roditi, Giles Stanley, Bethany Welsh, Paul Jhund, Pardeep S. Petrie, Mark C. McMurray, John J.V. ESC Heart Fail Original Research Articles AIMS: In patients at high risk of heart failure following myocardial infarction (MI) as a result of residual left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD), the angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor sacubitril/valsartan may result in a greater attenuation of adverse left ventricular (LV) remodelling than renin angiotensin aldosterone system inhibition alone, due to increased levels of substrates for neprilysin with vasodilatory, anti‐hypertrophic, anti‐fibrotic, and sympatholytic effects. METHODS: We designed a randomized, double‐blinded, active‐comparator trial to examine the effect of sacubitril/valsartan to the current standard of care in reducing adverse LV remodelling in patients with asymptomatic LVSD following MI. Eligible patients were ≥3 months following MI, had an LV ejection fraction ≤40% as measured by echocardiography, were New York Heart Association functional classification I, tolerant of an angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker at equivalent dose of ramipril 2.5 mg twice daily or greater, and taking a beta‐blocker unless contraindicated or intolerant. Patients were randomized to sacubitril/valsartan (target dose 97/103 mg twice daily) or valsartan (target dose 160 mg twice daily). The primary endpoint will be change in LV end‐systolic volume indexed for body surface area measured using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging over 52 weeks from randomization. Secondary endpoints include other magnetic resonance imaging‐based metrics of LV remodelling, biomarkers associated with LV remodelling and neurohumoral activation, and change in patient well‐being assessed using a patient global assessment questionnaire. CONCLUSIONS: This trial will investigate the effect of neprilysin inhibition on LV remodelling and the neurohumoral actions of sacubitril/valsartan in patients with asymptomatic LVSD following MI. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7835504/ /pubmed/33305513 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.13137 Text en © 2020 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research Articles
Docherty, Kieran F.
Campbell, Ross T.
Brooksbank, Katriona J.M.
Godeseth, Rosemary L.
Forsyth, Paul
McConnachie, Alex
Roditi, Giles
Stanley, Bethany
Welsh, Paul
Jhund, Pardeep S.
Petrie, Mark C.
McMurray, John J.V.
Rationale and methods of a randomized trial evaluating the effect of neprilysin inhibition on left ventricular remodelling
title Rationale and methods of a randomized trial evaluating the effect of neprilysin inhibition on left ventricular remodelling
title_full Rationale and methods of a randomized trial evaluating the effect of neprilysin inhibition on left ventricular remodelling
title_fullStr Rationale and methods of a randomized trial evaluating the effect of neprilysin inhibition on left ventricular remodelling
title_full_unstemmed Rationale and methods of a randomized trial evaluating the effect of neprilysin inhibition on left ventricular remodelling
title_short Rationale and methods of a randomized trial evaluating the effect of neprilysin inhibition on left ventricular remodelling
title_sort rationale and methods of a randomized trial evaluating the effect of neprilysin inhibition on left ventricular remodelling
topic Original Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7835504/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33305513
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.13137
work_keys_str_mv AT dochertykieranf rationaleandmethodsofarandomizedtrialevaluatingtheeffectofneprilysininhibitiononleftventricularremodelling
AT campbellrosst rationaleandmethodsofarandomizedtrialevaluatingtheeffectofneprilysininhibitiononleftventricularremodelling
AT brooksbankkatrionajm rationaleandmethodsofarandomizedtrialevaluatingtheeffectofneprilysininhibitiononleftventricularremodelling
AT godesethrosemaryl rationaleandmethodsofarandomizedtrialevaluatingtheeffectofneprilysininhibitiononleftventricularremodelling
AT forsythpaul rationaleandmethodsofarandomizedtrialevaluatingtheeffectofneprilysininhibitiononleftventricularremodelling
AT mcconnachiealex rationaleandmethodsofarandomizedtrialevaluatingtheeffectofneprilysininhibitiononleftventricularremodelling
AT roditigiles rationaleandmethodsofarandomizedtrialevaluatingtheeffectofneprilysininhibitiononleftventricularremodelling
AT stanleybethany rationaleandmethodsofarandomizedtrialevaluatingtheeffectofneprilysininhibitiononleftventricularremodelling
AT welshpaul rationaleandmethodsofarandomizedtrialevaluatingtheeffectofneprilysininhibitiononleftventricularremodelling
AT jhundpardeeps rationaleandmethodsofarandomizedtrialevaluatingtheeffectofneprilysininhibitiononleftventricularremodelling
AT petriemarkc rationaleandmethodsofarandomizedtrialevaluatingtheeffectofneprilysininhibitiononleftventricularremodelling
AT mcmurrayjohnjv rationaleandmethodsofarandomizedtrialevaluatingtheeffectofneprilysininhibitiononleftventricularremodelling