Cargando…

Impact of a volume challenge on haemodynamics and prognosis in patients with severe aortic stenosis

AIMS: A volume challenge can unmask pulmonary hypertension (PH) and its mechanism. We evaluated the impact of a volume challenge on mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) and mean pulmonary artery wedge pressure (mPAWP) and its prognostic implications in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) unde...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maeder, Micha T., Weber, Lukas, Weilenmann, Daniel, Haager, Philipp K., Joerg, Lucas, Rohner, Franziska, Ammann, Peter, Chronis, Joannis, Rigger, Johannes, Rickli, Hans
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7835590/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33179419
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.13108
_version_ 1783642560882802688
author Maeder, Micha T.
Weber, Lukas
Weilenmann, Daniel
Haager, Philipp K.
Joerg, Lucas
Rohner, Franziska
Ammann, Peter
Chronis, Joannis
Rigger, Johannes
Rickli, Hans
author_facet Maeder, Micha T.
Weber, Lukas
Weilenmann, Daniel
Haager, Philipp K.
Joerg, Lucas
Rohner, Franziska
Ammann, Peter
Chronis, Joannis
Rigger, Johannes
Rickli, Hans
author_sort Maeder, Micha T.
collection PubMed
description AIMS: A volume challenge can unmask pulmonary hypertension (PH) and its mechanism. We evaluated the impact of a volume challenge on mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) and mean pulmonary artery wedge pressure (mPAWP) and its prognostic implications in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR). METHODS AND RESULTS: In 285 patients with severe AS (indexed aortic valve area 0.41 ± 0.13 cm(2)/m(2)), mPAP and mPAWP were measured before and after administration of 150 ± 58 mL of low‐osmolal or iso‐osmolal contrast. Following contrast, mPAP and mPAWP rose from 25 ± 10 and 16 ± 8 mmHg by 5 ± 4 and 4 ± 4 mmHg to 30 ± 11 and 20 ± 8 mmHg. There were 112 (39%) patients with pre‐contrast PH and 70 (40% of those without pre‐contrast PH) patients with post‐contrast PH only. Post‐contrast PH patients were intermediate between pre‐contrast PH and no PH in terms of AS severity, cardiac dysfunction, and haemodynamics. After a median follow‐up of 43 months post‐AVR, pre‐contrast PH patients had numerically the highest mortality driven by those with pre‐contrast combined pre‐capillary and post‐capillary PH (n = 35), while post‐contrast changes in mPAP and mPAWP were not related to mortality. Patients with any post‐contrast mPAWP > 18 mmHg had significantly higher mortality than those with post‐contrast mPAWP ≤ 18 mmHg, CONCLUSIONS: In severe AS, a contrast challenge leads to post‐contrast PH in ~40% of patients without pre‐contrast PH. However, post‐contrast haemodynamic changes do not adversely affect outcomes in patients undergoing AVR. Post‐contrast PH represents an intermediate stage of ‘cardiac damage’, which may be attenuated or reversible after AVR.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7835590
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78355902021-02-01 Impact of a volume challenge on haemodynamics and prognosis in patients with severe aortic stenosis Maeder, Micha T. Weber, Lukas Weilenmann, Daniel Haager, Philipp K. Joerg, Lucas Rohner, Franziska Ammann, Peter Chronis, Joannis Rigger, Johannes Rickli, Hans ESC Heart Fail Original Research Articles AIMS: A volume challenge can unmask pulmonary hypertension (PH) and its mechanism. We evaluated the impact of a volume challenge on mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) and mean pulmonary artery wedge pressure (mPAWP) and its prognostic implications in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR). METHODS AND RESULTS: In 285 patients with severe AS (indexed aortic valve area 0.41 ± 0.13 cm(2)/m(2)), mPAP and mPAWP were measured before and after administration of 150 ± 58 mL of low‐osmolal or iso‐osmolal contrast. Following contrast, mPAP and mPAWP rose from 25 ± 10 and 16 ± 8 mmHg by 5 ± 4 and 4 ± 4 mmHg to 30 ± 11 and 20 ± 8 mmHg. There were 112 (39%) patients with pre‐contrast PH and 70 (40% of those without pre‐contrast PH) patients with post‐contrast PH only. Post‐contrast PH patients were intermediate between pre‐contrast PH and no PH in terms of AS severity, cardiac dysfunction, and haemodynamics. After a median follow‐up of 43 months post‐AVR, pre‐contrast PH patients had numerically the highest mortality driven by those with pre‐contrast combined pre‐capillary and post‐capillary PH (n = 35), while post‐contrast changes in mPAP and mPAWP were not related to mortality. Patients with any post‐contrast mPAWP > 18 mmHg had significantly higher mortality than those with post‐contrast mPAWP ≤ 18 mmHg, CONCLUSIONS: In severe AS, a contrast challenge leads to post‐contrast PH in ~40% of patients without pre‐contrast PH. However, post‐contrast haemodynamic changes do not adversely affect outcomes in patients undergoing AVR. Post‐contrast PH represents an intermediate stage of ‘cardiac damage’, which may be attenuated or reversible after AVR. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-11-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7835590/ /pubmed/33179419 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.13108 Text en ©2020 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Research Articles
Maeder, Micha T.
Weber, Lukas
Weilenmann, Daniel
Haager, Philipp K.
Joerg, Lucas
Rohner, Franziska
Ammann, Peter
Chronis, Joannis
Rigger, Johannes
Rickli, Hans
Impact of a volume challenge on haemodynamics and prognosis in patients with severe aortic stenosis
title Impact of a volume challenge on haemodynamics and prognosis in patients with severe aortic stenosis
title_full Impact of a volume challenge on haemodynamics and prognosis in patients with severe aortic stenosis
title_fullStr Impact of a volume challenge on haemodynamics and prognosis in patients with severe aortic stenosis
title_full_unstemmed Impact of a volume challenge on haemodynamics and prognosis in patients with severe aortic stenosis
title_short Impact of a volume challenge on haemodynamics and prognosis in patients with severe aortic stenosis
title_sort impact of a volume challenge on haemodynamics and prognosis in patients with severe aortic stenosis
topic Original Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7835590/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33179419
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.13108
work_keys_str_mv AT maedermichat impactofavolumechallengeonhaemodynamicsandprognosisinpatientswithsevereaorticstenosis
AT weberlukas impactofavolumechallengeonhaemodynamicsandprognosisinpatientswithsevereaorticstenosis
AT weilenmanndaniel impactofavolumechallengeonhaemodynamicsandprognosisinpatientswithsevereaorticstenosis
AT haagerphilippk impactofavolumechallengeonhaemodynamicsandprognosisinpatientswithsevereaorticstenosis
AT joerglucas impactofavolumechallengeonhaemodynamicsandprognosisinpatientswithsevereaorticstenosis
AT rohnerfranziska impactofavolumechallengeonhaemodynamicsandprognosisinpatientswithsevereaorticstenosis
AT ammannpeter impactofavolumechallengeonhaemodynamicsandprognosisinpatientswithsevereaorticstenosis
AT chronisjoannis impactofavolumechallengeonhaemodynamicsandprognosisinpatientswithsevereaorticstenosis
AT riggerjohannes impactofavolumechallengeonhaemodynamicsandprognosisinpatientswithsevereaorticstenosis
AT ricklihans impactofavolumechallengeonhaemodynamicsandprognosisinpatientswithsevereaorticstenosis