Cargando…

Biventricular pacemaker and defibrillator implantation in patients with chronic heart failure in China

AIMS: This study aims to investigate the current status of biventricular pacemaker and defibrillator implantation in chronic heart failure (CHF) patients with indications for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in China and the effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT)‐pacemake...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Dejia, Hua, Wei, Fang, Quan, Yan, Ji, Su, Yangang, Liu, Bing, Xu, Yuanning, Peng, Yong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7835594/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33169538
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.13114
_version_ 1783642561843298304
author Huang, Dejia
Hua, Wei
Fang, Quan
Yan, Ji
Su, Yangang
Liu, Bing
Xu, Yuanning
Peng, Yong
author_facet Huang, Dejia
Hua, Wei
Fang, Quan
Yan, Ji
Su, Yangang
Liu, Bing
Xu, Yuanning
Peng, Yong
author_sort Huang, Dejia
collection PubMed
description AIMS: This study aims to investigate the current status of biventricular pacemaker and defibrillator implantation in chronic heart failure (CHF) patients with indications for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in China and the effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT)‐pacemaker (P) and CRT‐defibrillator (D) implantation on the clinical prognosis of CHF among patients undergoing CRT. METHODS AND RESULTS: Overall, 798 consecutive patients who had devices implanted (implantable cardioverter defibrillator: 199, CRT‐D: 362, and CRT‐P: 237) from May 2012 to July 2013 in POSCD‐China, a multicentric prospective cohort study, were enrolled. The primary endpoint was all‐cause death, and the secondary endpoint was SCD. In total, 71.3% of patients had non‐ischaemic CHF. The mean follow‐up time was 27.7 ± 12.0 months, and death occurred in 158 cases, with 35 cases of SCD. CHF was the main cause of death (68.4%), followed by sudden death (22.2%). In the CRT‐P group, the SCD rate was 8.0%, which was much higher than that in the CRT‐D (3.3%) and implantable cardioverter defibrillator (2.0%) groups. No significant differences were identified in the all‐cause death rate between the CRT‐D and CRT‐P groups (CRT‐D vs. CRT‐P, 20.4% vs. 19.4%, P = 0.840). CONCLUSIONS: In China, among CHF patients with indications for primary prevention of SCD who received device implantation, non‐ischaemic CHF was the main aetiology, and the most important cause of death was heart failure. No differences in all‐cause death were observed between the CRT‐D and CRT‐P groups, but the CRT‐D group had a lower SCD rate than the CRT‐P group.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7835594
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78355942021-02-01 Biventricular pacemaker and defibrillator implantation in patients with chronic heart failure in China Huang, Dejia Hua, Wei Fang, Quan Yan, Ji Su, Yangang Liu, Bing Xu, Yuanning Peng, Yong ESC Heart Fail Original Research Articles AIMS: This study aims to investigate the current status of biventricular pacemaker and defibrillator implantation in chronic heart failure (CHF) patients with indications for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in China and the effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT)‐pacemaker (P) and CRT‐defibrillator (D) implantation on the clinical prognosis of CHF among patients undergoing CRT. METHODS AND RESULTS: Overall, 798 consecutive patients who had devices implanted (implantable cardioverter defibrillator: 199, CRT‐D: 362, and CRT‐P: 237) from May 2012 to July 2013 in POSCD‐China, a multicentric prospective cohort study, were enrolled. The primary endpoint was all‐cause death, and the secondary endpoint was SCD. In total, 71.3% of patients had non‐ischaemic CHF. The mean follow‐up time was 27.7 ± 12.0 months, and death occurred in 158 cases, with 35 cases of SCD. CHF was the main cause of death (68.4%), followed by sudden death (22.2%). In the CRT‐P group, the SCD rate was 8.0%, which was much higher than that in the CRT‐D (3.3%) and implantable cardioverter defibrillator (2.0%) groups. No significant differences were identified in the all‐cause death rate between the CRT‐D and CRT‐P groups (CRT‐D vs. CRT‐P, 20.4% vs. 19.4%, P = 0.840). CONCLUSIONS: In China, among CHF patients with indications for primary prevention of SCD who received device implantation, non‐ischaemic CHF was the main aetiology, and the most important cause of death was heart failure. No differences in all‐cause death were observed between the CRT‐D and CRT‐P groups, but the CRT‐D group had a lower SCD rate than the CRT‐P group. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7835594/ /pubmed/33169538 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.13114 Text en ©2020 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Research Articles
Huang, Dejia
Hua, Wei
Fang, Quan
Yan, Ji
Su, Yangang
Liu, Bing
Xu, Yuanning
Peng, Yong
Biventricular pacemaker and defibrillator implantation in patients with chronic heart failure in China
title Biventricular pacemaker and defibrillator implantation in patients with chronic heart failure in China
title_full Biventricular pacemaker and defibrillator implantation in patients with chronic heart failure in China
title_fullStr Biventricular pacemaker and defibrillator implantation in patients with chronic heart failure in China
title_full_unstemmed Biventricular pacemaker and defibrillator implantation in patients with chronic heart failure in China
title_short Biventricular pacemaker and defibrillator implantation in patients with chronic heart failure in China
title_sort biventricular pacemaker and defibrillator implantation in patients with chronic heart failure in china
topic Original Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7835594/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33169538
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.13114
work_keys_str_mv AT huangdejia biventricularpacemakeranddefibrillatorimplantationinpatientswithchronicheartfailureinchina
AT huawei biventricularpacemakeranddefibrillatorimplantationinpatientswithchronicheartfailureinchina
AT fangquan biventricularpacemakeranddefibrillatorimplantationinpatientswithchronicheartfailureinchina
AT yanji biventricularpacemakeranddefibrillatorimplantationinpatientswithchronicheartfailureinchina
AT suyangang biventricularpacemakeranddefibrillatorimplantationinpatientswithchronicheartfailureinchina
AT liubing biventricularpacemakeranddefibrillatorimplantationinpatientswithchronicheartfailureinchina
AT xuyuanning biventricularpacemakeranddefibrillatorimplantationinpatientswithchronicheartfailureinchina
AT pengyong biventricularpacemakeranddefibrillatorimplantationinpatientswithchronicheartfailureinchina
AT biventricularpacemakeranddefibrillatorimplantationinpatientswithchronicheartfailureinchina