Cargando…

Multisensory Interactions in Head and Body Centered Perception of Verticality

Percepts of verticality are thought to be constructed as a weighted average of multisensory inputs, but the observed weights differ considerably between studies. In the present study, we evaluate whether this can be explained by differences in how visual, somatosensory and proprioceptive cues contri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: De Winkel, Ksander N., Edel, Ellen, Happee, Riender, Bülthoff, Heinrich H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7835726/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33510611
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.599226
_version_ 1783642589169188864
author De Winkel, Ksander N.
Edel, Ellen
Happee, Riender
Bülthoff, Heinrich H.
author_facet De Winkel, Ksander N.
Edel, Ellen
Happee, Riender
Bülthoff, Heinrich H.
author_sort De Winkel, Ksander N.
collection PubMed
description Percepts of verticality are thought to be constructed as a weighted average of multisensory inputs, but the observed weights differ considerably between studies. In the present study, we evaluate whether this can be explained by differences in how visual, somatosensory and proprioceptive cues contribute to representations of the Head In Space (HIS) and Body In Space (BIS). Participants (10) were standing on a force plate on top of a motion platform while wearing a visualization device that allowed us to artificially tilt their visual surroundings. They were presented with (in)congruent combinations of visual, platform, and head tilt, and performed Rod & Frame Test (RFT) and Subjective Postural Vertical (SPV) tasks. We also recorded postural responses to evaluate the relation between perception and balance. The perception data shows that body tilt, head tilt, and visual tilt affect the HIS and BIS in both experimental tasks. For the RFT task, visual tilt induced considerable biases (≈ 10° for 36° visual tilt) in the direction of the vertical expressed in the visual scene; for the SPV task, participants also adjusted platform tilt to correct for illusory body tilt induced by the visual stimuli, but effects were much smaller (≈ 0.25°). Likewise, postural data from the SPV task indicate participants slightly shifted their weight to counteract visual tilt (0.3° for 36° visual tilt). The data reveal a striking dissociation of visual effects between the two tasks. We find that the data can be explained well using a model where percepts of the HIS and BIS are constructed from direct signals from head and body sensors, respectively, and indirect signals based on body and head signals but corrected for perceived neck tilt. These findings show that perception of the HIS and BIS derive from the same sensory signals, but see profoundly different weighting factors. We conclude that observations of different weightings between studies likely result from querying of distinct latent constructs referenced to the body or head in space.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7835726
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78357262021-01-27 Multisensory Interactions in Head and Body Centered Perception of Verticality De Winkel, Ksander N. Edel, Ellen Happee, Riender Bülthoff, Heinrich H. Front Neurosci Neuroscience Percepts of verticality are thought to be constructed as a weighted average of multisensory inputs, but the observed weights differ considerably between studies. In the present study, we evaluate whether this can be explained by differences in how visual, somatosensory and proprioceptive cues contribute to representations of the Head In Space (HIS) and Body In Space (BIS). Participants (10) were standing on a force plate on top of a motion platform while wearing a visualization device that allowed us to artificially tilt their visual surroundings. They were presented with (in)congruent combinations of visual, platform, and head tilt, and performed Rod & Frame Test (RFT) and Subjective Postural Vertical (SPV) tasks. We also recorded postural responses to evaluate the relation between perception and balance. The perception data shows that body tilt, head tilt, and visual tilt affect the HIS and BIS in both experimental tasks. For the RFT task, visual tilt induced considerable biases (≈ 10° for 36° visual tilt) in the direction of the vertical expressed in the visual scene; for the SPV task, participants also adjusted platform tilt to correct for illusory body tilt induced by the visual stimuli, but effects were much smaller (≈ 0.25°). Likewise, postural data from the SPV task indicate participants slightly shifted their weight to counteract visual tilt (0.3° for 36° visual tilt). The data reveal a striking dissociation of visual effects between the two tasks. We find that the data can be explained well using a model where percepts of the HIS and BIS are constructed from direct signals from head and body sensors, respectively, and indirect signals based on body and head signals but corrected for perceived neck tilt. These findings show that perception of the HIS and BIS derive from the same sensory signals, but see profoundly different weighting factors. We conclude that observations of different weightings between studies likely result from querying of distinct latent constructs referenced to the body or head in space. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-01-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7835726/ /pubmed/33510611 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.599226 Text en Copyright © 2021 De Winkel, Edel, Happee and Bülthoff. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
De Winkel, Ksander N.
Edel, Ellen
Happee, Riender
Bülthoff, Heinrich H.
Multisensory Interactions in Head and Body Centered Perception of Verticality
title Multisensory Interactions in Head and Body Centered Perception of Verticality
title_full Multisensory Interactions in Head and Body Centered Perception of Verticality
title_fullStr Multisensory Interactions in Head and Body Centered Perception of Verticality
title_full_unstemmed Multisensory Interactions in Head and Body Centered Perception of Verticality
title_short Multisensory Interactions in Head and Body Centered Perception of Verticality
title_sort multisensory interactions in head and body centered perception of verticality
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7835726/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33510611
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.599226
work_keys_str_mv AT dewinkelksandern multisensoryinteractionsinheadandbodycenteredperceptionofverticality
AT edelellen multisensoryinteractionsinheadandbodycenteredperceptionofverticality
AT happeeriender multisensoryinteractionsinheadandbodycenteredperceptionofverticality
AT bulthoffheinrichh multisensoryinteractionsinheadandbodycenteredperceptionofverticality