Cargando…

Interproximal contact areas of primary molars based on OXIS classification – a two centre cross sectional study

Background: Contact areas in primary teeth are known to be broader, flatter and situated farther gingivally than permanent teeth. The purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence of OXIS contact areas between primary molars using die models of children from two different ethnic populations. Th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Walia, Tarun, Kirthiga, M, Brigi, Carel, Muthu, M S, Odeh, Ruba, Pakash Mathur, Vijay, Rodrigues, Steven
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: F1000 Research Limited 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7836030/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33537460
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16424.2
_version_ 1783642663960969216
author Walia, Tarun
Kirthiga, M
Brigi, Carel
Muthu, M S
Odeh, Ruba
Pakash Mathur, Vijay
Rodrigues, Steven
author_facet Walia, Tarun
Kirthiga, M
Brigi, Carel
Muthu, M S
Odeh, Ruba
Pakash Mathur, Vijay
Rodrigues, Steven
author_sort Walia, Tarun
collection PubMed
description Background: Contact areas in primary teeth are known to be broader, flatter and situated farther gingivally than permanent teeth. The purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence of OXIS contact areas between primary molars using die models of children from two different ethnic populations. The research question of the present study is “What is the prevalence OXIS contact areas of primary molars in the populations studied?”. Methods: A cross-sectional study was planned in a representative sample of 200 caries-free contact areas among children aged 3-6 years in two centers, Ajman and Puducherry. Data collection was performed from sectional or full-arch die stone models. The contacts were assessed according to OXIS classification by a single calibrated examiner at Center 2. Prevalence was expressed as numbers and percentages. The Chi-square test was applied to determine the association of OXIS contacts across genders and arches. Results: The prevalence of O, X, I, and S contacts were 19%, 22.5%, 53%, and 5.5% in Center 1 and 6%, 1.5%, 75.5%, and 17% in Center 2, respectively. Significant results (p=0.005) were obtained in Center 1 when inter-arch comparison was performed and between the centers with respect to type of contact. No significant difference was obtained with respect to gender and OXIS contact areas. Conclusions: The present study confirmed OXIS contacts in both the centers. The ‘O’ and ‘X’ types of contacts were observed more in Center 1, whereas ‘I’ and ‘S’ contacts were observed more in Center 2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7836030
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher F1000 Research Limited
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78360302021-02-02 Interproximal contact areas of primary molars based on OXIS classification – a two centre cross sectional study Walia, Tarun Kirthiga, M Brigi, Carel Muthu, M S Odeh, Ruba Pakash Mathur, Vijay Rodrigues, Steven Wellcome Open Res Research Article Background: Contact areas in primary teeth are known to be broader, flatter and situated farther gingivally than permanent teeth. The purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence of OXIS contact areas between primary molars using die models of children from two different ethnic populations. The research question of the present study is “What is the prevalence OXIS contact areas of primary molars in the populations studied?”. Methods: A cross-sectional study was planned in a representative sample of 200 caries-free contact areas among children aged 3-6 years in two centers, Ajman and Puducherry. Data collection was performed from sectional or full-arch die stone models. The contacts were assessed according to OXIS classification by a single calibrated examiner at Center 2. Prevalence was expressed as numbers and percentages. The Chi-square test was applied to determine the association of OXIS contacts across genders and arches. Results: The prevalence of O, X, I, and S contacts were 19%, 22.5%, 53%, and 5.5% in Center 1 and 6%, 1.5%, 75.5%, and 17% in Center 2, respectively. Significant results (p=0.005) were obtained in Center 1 when inter-arch comparison was performed and between the centers with respect to type of contact. No significant difference was obtained with respect to gender and OXIS contact areas. Conclusions: The present study confirmed OXIS contacts in both the centers. The ‘O’ and ‘X’ types of contacts were observed more in Center 1, whereas ‘I’ and ‘S’ contacts were observed more in Center 2. F1000 Research Limited 2021-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7836030/ /pubmed/33537460 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16424.2 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Walia T et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Walia, Tarun
Kirthiga, M
Brigi, Carel
Muthu, M S
Odeh, Ruba
Pakash Mathur, Vijay
Rodrigues, Steven
Interproximal contact areas of primary molars based on OXIS classification – a two centre cross sectional study
title Interproximal contact areas of primary molars based on OXIS classification – a two centre cross sectional study
title_full Interproximal contact areas of primary molars based on OXIS classification – a two centre cross sectional study
title_fullStr Interproximal contact areas of primary molars based on OXIS classification – a two centre cross sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Interproximal contact areas of primary molars based on OXIS classification – a two centre cross sectional study
title_short Interproximal contact areas of primary molars based on OXIS classification – a two centre cross sectional study
title_sort interproximal contact areas of primary molars based on oxis classification – a two centre cross sectional study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7836030/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33537460
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16424.2
work_keys_str_mv AT waliatarun interproximalcontactareasofprimarymolarsbasedonoxisclassificationatwocentrecrosssectionalstudy
AT kirthigam interproximalcontactareasofprimarymolarsbasedonoxisclassificationatwocentrecrosssectionalstudy
AT brigicarel interproximalcontactareasofprimarymolarsbasedonoxisclassificationatwocentrecrosssectionalstudy
AT muthums interproximalcontactareasofprimarymolarsbasedonoxisclassificationatwocentrecrosssectionalstudy
AT odehruba interproximalcontactareasofprimarymolarsbasedonoxisclassificationatwocentrecrosssectionalstudy
AT pakashmathurvijay interproximalcontactareasofprimarymolarsbasedonoxisclassificationatwocentrecrosssectionalstudy
AT rodriguessteven interproximalcontactareasofprimarymolarsbasedonoxisclassificationatwocentrecrosssectionalstudy