Cargando…

Blinding in electric current stimulation in subacute neglect patients with current densities of 0.8 A/m(2): a cross-over pilot study

OBJECTIVE: Neglect after stroke is a disabling disorder and its rehabilitation is a major challenge. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) seems to be a promising adjuvant technique to improve standard care neglect therapy. Since electric fields are influenced by age-related factors, higher...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gorsler, Anna, Grittner, Ulrike, Külzow, Nadine, Rackoll, Torsten
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7836170/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33494832
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-020-05421-7
_version_ 1783642688871989248
author Gorsler, Anna
Grittner, Ulrike
Külzow, Nadine
Rackoll, Torsten
author_facet Gorsler, Anna
Grittner, Ulrike
Külzow, Nadine
Rackoll, Torsten
author_sort Gorsler, Anna
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Neglect after stroke is a disabling disorder and its rehabilitation is a major challenge. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) seems to be a promising adjuvant technique to improve standard care neglect therapy. Since electric fields are influenced by age-related factors, higher current densities are probably needed for effective treatment in aged stroke patients. Validation of treatment efficacy requires sham-controlled experiments, but increased current densities might comprise blinding. Therefore, a pilot study was conducted to test sham adequacy when using current density of 0.8 A/m(2). Whether especially neglect patients who mainly suffer from perceptual and attentional deficits are able to differentiate beyond chance active from sham tDCS was investigated in a randomized cross-over design (active/sham stimulation) in 12 early subacute patients with left-sided hemineglect. Stimulation (0.8 A/m(2)) was performed simultaneous to standard care neglect therapy. RESULTS: Odds ratio of correct guessing an atDCS condition compared to wrongly judge an atDCS condition as sham was 10.00 (95%CI 0.65–154.40, p = 0.099). However, given the small sample size and high OR, although likely somewhat overestimated, results require careful interpretation and blinding success in neglect studies with current densities of 0.8 A/m(2) should be further confirmed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7836170
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78361702021-01-26 Blinding in electric current stimulation in subacute neglect patients with current densities of 0.8 A/m(2): a cross-over pilot study Gorsler, Anna Grittner, Ulrike Külzow, Nadine Rackoll, Torsten BMC Res Notes Research Note OBJECTIVE: Neglect after stroke is a disabling disorder and its rehabilitation is a major challenge. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) seems to be a promising adjuvant technique to improve standard care neglect therapy. Since electric fields are influenced by age-related factors, higher current densities are probably needed for effective treatment in aged stroke patients. Validation of treatment efficacy requires sham-controlled experiments, but increased current densities might comprise blinding. Therefore, a pilot study was conducted to test sham adequacy when using current density of 0.8 A/m(2). Whether especially neglect patients who mainly suffer from perceptual and attentional deficits are able to differentiate beyond chance active from sham tDCS was investigated in a randomized cross-over design (active/sham stimulation) in 12 early subacute patients with left-sided hemineglect. Stimulation (0.8 A/m(2)) was performed simultaneous to standard care neglect therapy. RESULTS: Odds ratio of correct guessing an atDCS condition compared to wrongly judge an atDCS condition as sham was 10.00 (95%CI 0.65–154.40, p = 0.099). However, given the small sample size and high OR, although likely somewhat overestimated, results require careful interpretation and blinding success in neglect studies with current densities of 0.8 A/m(2) should be further confirmed. BioMed Central 2021-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7836170/ /pubmed/33494832 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-020-05421-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Note
Gorsler, Anna
Grittner, Ulrike
Külzow, Nadine
Rackoll, Torsten
Blinding in electric current stimulation in subacute neglect patients with current densities of 0.8 A/m(2): a cross-over pilot study
title Blinding in electric current stimulation in subacute neglect patients with current densities of 0.8 A/m(2): a cross-over pilot study
title_full Blinding in electric current stimulation in subacute neglect patients with current densities of 0.8 A/m(2): a cross-over pilot study
title_fullStr Blinding in electric current stimulation in subacute neglect patients with current densities of 0.8 A/m(2): a cross-over pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Blinding in electric current stimulation in subacute neglect patients with current densities of 0.8 A/m(2): a cross-over pilot study
title_short Blinding in electric current stimulation in subacute neglect patients with current densities of 0.8 A/m(2): a cross-over pilot study
title_sort blinding in electric current stimulation in subacute neglect patients with current densities of 0.8 a/m(2): a cross-over pilot study
topic Research Note
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7836170/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33494832
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-020-05421-7
work_keys_str_mv AT gorsleranna blindinginelectriccurrentstimulationinsubacuteneglectpatientswithcurrentdensitiesof08am2acrossoverpilotstudy
AT grittnerulrike blindinginelectriccurrentstimulationinsubacuteneglectpatientswithcurrentdensitiesof08am2acrossoverpilotstudy
AT kulzownadine blindinginelectriccurrentstimulationinsubacuteneglectpatientswithcurrentdensitiesof08am2acrossoverpilotstudy
AT rackolltorsten blindinginelectriccurrentstimulationinsubacuteneglectpatientswithcurrentdensitiesof08am2acrossoverpilotstudy