Cargando…
Tolerability and outcome of sunitinib by giving 4/2 schedule versus 2/1 schedule in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients: a prospective randomized multi-centric Egyptian study
INTRODUCTION: Sunitinib is a standard of care first line treatment for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Sunitinib standard dose is 50 mg once daily for 4 consecutive weeks followed by 2 weeks’ off (4/2 schedule). Long-term and high exposure to this medication lead to severe adver...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Termedia Publishing House
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7836283/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33531869 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/wo.2020.102802 |
_version_ | 1783642715200684032 |
---|---|
author | Abdelaziz, Lobna A. Taha, Heba F. Ali, Magid M. Abdelgawad, Marwa I. Elwan, Amira |
author_facet | Abdelaziz, Lobna A. Taha, Heba F. Ali, Magid M. Abdelgawad, Marwa I. Elwan, Amira |
author_sort | Abdelaziz, Lobna A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Sunitinib is a standard of care first line treatment for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Sunitinib standard dose is 50 mg once daily for 4 consecutive weeks followed by 2 weeks’ off (4/2 schedule). Long-term and high exposure to this medication lead to severe adverse events (AEs); therefore, this trial was done to find the best schedule which gives the best outcome with minimal toxicity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy patients were randomly assigned into 2 groups, then received 50 mg/day of sunitinib. Group 1 (40 patients) received sunitinib for 4 consecutive weeks followed by 2 weeks off (4/2 schedule) while 30 patients were admitted to group 2 with 2 weeks on and 1 week off (2/1 schedule). RESULTS: All patients (100%) had significantly higher AEs on schedule 4/2 vs. 73.3% on schedule 2/1 (p = 0.001). Furthermore, the grade 3 AEs on schedule 2/1 were significantly lower than those on schedule 4/2 (26.7% vs. 82.5%) respectively (p = 0.001), such as fatigue, diarrhea, hypertension, hand foot syndrome (HFS) and mucositis. Progression-free survival (PFS) rate was significantly higher in 2/1 schedule (60.9% vs. 38.6%) than in 4/2 schedule (p < 0.008). Multivariate analysis suggested that: age > 60 years, poor International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) risk category, tumor size > 10 cm and treatment schedule (group 1) were poor prognostic factors of PFS. CONCLUSIONS: Our study supported the use of 2/1 schedule of sunitinib in patients with metastatic RCC because of lower toxicity profile and better efficacy with improved PFS in comparison to 4/2 schedule. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7836283 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Termedia Publishing House |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78362832021-02-01 Tolerability and outcome of sunitinib by giving 4/2 schedule versus 2/1 schedule in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients: a prospective randomized multi-centric Egyptian study Abdelaziz, Lobna A. Taha, Heba F. Ali, Magid M. Abdelgawad, Marwa I. Elwan, Amira Contemp Oncol (Pozn) Original Paper INTRODUCTION: Sunitinib is a standard of care first line treatment for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Sunitinib standard dose is 50 mg once daily for 4 consecutive weeks followed by 2 weeks’ off (4/2 schedule). Long-term and high exposure to this medication lead to severe adverse events (AEs); therefore, this trial was done to find the best schedule which gives the best outcome with minimal toxicity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy patients were randomly assigned into 2 groups, then received 50 mg/day of sunitinib. Group 1 (40 patients) received sunitinib for 4 consecutive weeks followed by 2 weeks off (4/2 schedule) while 30 patients were admitted to group 2 with 2 weeks on and 1 week off (2/1 schedule). RESULTS: All patients (100%) had significantly higher AEs on schedule 4/2 vs. 73.3% on schedule 2/1 (p = 0.001). Furthermore, the grade 3 AEs on schedule 2/1 were significantly lower than those on schedule 4/2 (26.7% vs. 82.5%) respectively (p = 0.001), such as fatigue, diarrhea, hypertension, hand foot syndrome (HFS) and mucositis. Progression-free survival (PFS) rate was significantly higher in 2/1 schedule (60.9% vs. 38.6%) than in 4/2 schedule (p < 0.008). Multivariate analysis suggested that: age > 60 years, poor International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) risk category, tumor size > 10 cm and treatment schedule (group 1) were poor prognostic factors of PFS. CONCLUSIONS: Our study supported the use of 2/1 schedule of sunitinib in patients with metastatic RCC because of lower toxicity profile and better efficacy with improved PFS in comparison to 4/2 schedule. Termedia Publishing House 2021-01-04 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7836283/ /pubmed/33531869 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/wo.2020.102802 Text en Copyright © 2020 Termedia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Abdelaziz, Lobna A. Taha, Heba F. Ali, Magid M. Abdelgawad, Marwa I. Elwan, Amira Tolerability and outcome of sunitinib by giving 4/2 schedule versus 2/1 schedule in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients: a prospective randomized multi-centric Egyptian study |
title | Tolerability and outcome of sunitinib by giving 4/2 schedule versus 2/1 schedule in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients: a prospective randomized multi-centric Egyptian study |
title_full | Tolerability and outcome of sunitinib by giving 4/2 schedule versus 2/1 schedule in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients: a prospective randomized multi-centric Egyptian study |
title_fullStr | Tolerability and outcome of sunitinib by giving 4/2 schedule versus 2/1 schedule in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients: a prospective randomized multi-centric Egyptian study |
title_full_unstemmed | Tolerability and outcome of sunitinib by giving 4/2 schedule versus 2/1 schedule in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients: a prospective randomized multi-centric Egyptian study |
title_short | Tolerability and outcome of sunitinib by giving 4/2 schedule versus 2/1 schedule in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients: a prospective randomized multi-centric Egyptian study |
title_sort | tolerability and outcome of sunitinib by giving 4/2 schedule versus 2/1 schedule in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients: a prospective randomized multi-centric egyptian study |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7836283/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33531869 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/wo.2020.102802 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT abdelazizlobnaa tolerabilityandoutcomeofsunitinibbygiving42scheduleversus21scheduleinmetastaticrenalcellcarcinomapatientsaprospectiverandomizedmulticentricegyptianstudy AT tahahebaf tolerabilityandoutcomeofsunitinibbygiving42scheduleversus21scheduleinmetastaticrenalcellcarcinomapatientsaprospectiverandomizedmulticentricegyptianstudy AT alimagidm tolerabilityandoutcomeofsunitinibbygiving42scheduleversus21scheduleinmetastaticrenalcellcarcinomapatientsaprospectiverandomizedmulticentricegyptianstudy AT abdelgawadmarwai tolerabilityandoutcomeofsunitinibbygiving42scheduleversus21scheduleinmetastaticrenalcellcarcinomapatientsaprospectiverandomizedmulticentricegyptianstudy AT elwanamira tolerabilityandoutcomeofsunitinibbygiving42scheduleversus21scheduleinmetastaticrenalcellcarcinomapatientsaprospectiverandomizedmulticentricegyptianstudy |