Cargando…
Safety and efficacy of inhaled nebulised interferon beta-1a (SNG001) for treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial
BACKGROUND: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection carries a substantial risk of severe and prolonged illness; treatment options are currently limited. We assessed the efficacy and safety of inhaled nebulised interferon beta-1a (SNG001) for the treatment of patients a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Ltd.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7836724/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33189161 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30511-7 |
_version_ | 1783642806671114240 |
---|---|
author | Monk, Phillip D Marsden, Richard J Tear, Victoria J Brookes, Jody Batten, Toby N Mankowski, Marcin Gabbay, Felicity J Davies, Donna E Holgate, Stephen T Ho, Ling-Pei Clark, Tristan Djukanovic, Ratko Wilkinson, Tom M A |
author_facet | Monk, Phillip D Marsden, Richard J Tear, Victoria J Brookes, Jody Batten, Toby N Mankowski, Marcin Gabbay, Felicity J Davies, Donna E Holgate, Stephen T Ho, Ling-Pei Clark, Tristan Djukanovic, Ratko Wilkinson, Tom M A |
author_sort | Monk, Phillip D |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection carries a substantial risk of severe and prolonged illness; treatment options are currently limited. We assessed the efficacy and safety of inhaled nebulised interferon beta-1a (SNG001) for the treatment of patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19. METHODS: We did a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 pilot trial at nine UK sites. Adults aged 18 years or older and admitted to hospital with COVID-19 symptoms, with a positive RT-PCR or point-of-care test, or both, were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive SNG001 (6 MIU) or placebo by inhalation via a mouthpiece daily for 14 days. The primary outcome was the change in clinical condition on the WHO Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvement (OSCI) during the dosing period in the intention-to-treat population (all randomised patients who received at least one dose of the study drug). The OSCI is a 9-point scale, where 0 corresponds to no infection and 8 corresponds to death. Multiple analyses were done to identify the most suitable statistical method for future clinical trials. Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events for 28 days. This trial is registered with Clinicaltrialsregister.eu (2020-001023-14) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04385095); the pilot trial of inpatients with COVID-19 is now completed. FINDINGS: Between March 30 and May 30, 2020, 101 patients were randomly assigned to SNG001 (n=50) or placebo (n=51). 48 received SNG001 and 50 received placebo and were included in the intention-to-treat population. 66 (67%) patients required oxygen supplementation at baseline: 29 in the placebo group and 37 in the SNG001 group. Patients receiving SNG001 had greater odds of improvement on the OSCI scale (odds ratio 2·32 [95% CI 1·07–5·04]; p=0·033) on day 15 or 16 and were more likely than those receiving placebo to recover to an OSCI score of 1 (no limitation of activities) during treatment (hazard ratio 2·19 [95% CI 1·03–4·69]; p=0·043). SNG001 was well tolerated. The most frequently reported treatment-emergent adverse event was headache (seven [15%] patients in the SNG001 group and five [10%] in the placebo group). There were three deaths in the placebo group and none in the SNG001 group. INTERPRETATION: Patients who received SNG001 had greater odds of improvement and recovered more rapidly from SARS-CoV-2 infection than patients who received placebo, providing a strong rationale for further trials. FUNDING: Synairgen Research. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7836724 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78367242021-01-26 Safety and efficacy of inhaled nebulised interferon beta-1a (SNG001) for treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial Monk, Phillip D Marsden, Richard J Tear, Victoria J Brookes, Jody Batten, Toby N Mankowski, Marcin Gabbay, Felicity J Davies, Donna E Holgate, Stephen T Ho, Ling-Pei Clark, Tristan Djukanovic, Ratko Wilkinson, Tom M A Lancet Respir Med Articles BACKGROUND: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection carries a substantial risk of severe and prolonged illness; treatment options are currently limited. We assessed the efficacy and safety of inhaled nebulised interferon beta-1a (SNG001) for the treatment of patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19. METHODS: We did a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 pilot trial at nine UK sites. Adults aged 18 years or older and admitted to hospital with COVID-19 symptoms, with a positive RT-PCR or point-of-care test, or both, were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive SNG001 (6 MIU) or placebo by inhalation via a mouthpiece daily for 14 days. The primary outcome was the change in clinical condition on the WHO Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvement (OSCI) during the dosing period in the intention-to-treat population (all randomised patients who received at least one dose of the study drug). The OSCI is a 9-point scale, where 0 corresponds to no infection and 8 corresponds to death. Multiple analyses were done to identify the most suitable statistical method for future clinical trials. Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events for 28 days. This trial is registered with Clinicaltrialsregister.eu (2020-001023-14) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04385095); the pilot trial of inpatients with COVID-19 is now completed. FINDINGS: Between March 30 and May 30, 2020, 101 patients were randomly assigned to SNG001 (n=50) or placebo (n=51). 48 received SNG001 and 50 received placebo and were included in the intention-to-treat population. 66 (67%) patients required oxygen supplementation at baseline: 29 in the placebo group and 37 in the SNG001 group. Patients receiving SNG001 had greater odds of improvement on the OSCI scale (odds ratio 2·32 [95% CI 1·07–5·04]; p=0·033) on day 15 or 16 and were more likely than those receiving placebo to recover to an OSCI score of 1 (no limitation of activities) during treatment (hazard ratio 2·19 [95% CI 1·03–4·69]; p=0·043). SNG001 was well tolerated. The most frequently reported treatment-emergent adverse event was headache (seven [15%] patients in the SNG001 group and five [10%] in the placebo group). There were three deaths in the placebo group and none in the SNG001 group. INTERPRETATION: Patients who received SNG001 had greater odds of improvement and recovered more rapidly from SARS-CoV-2 infection than patients who received placebo, providing a strong rationale for further trials. FUNDING: Synairgen Research. Elsevier Ltd. 2021-02 2020-11-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7836724/ /pubmed/33189161 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30511-7 Text en © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Articles Monk, Phillip D Marsden, Richard J Tear, Victoria J Brookes, Jody Batten, Toby N Mankowski, Marcin Gabbay, Felicity J Davies, Donna E Holgate, Stephen T Ho, Ling-Pei Clark, Tristan Djukanovic, Ratko Wilkinson, Tom M A Safety and efficacy of inhaled nebulised interferon beta-1a (SNG001) for treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial |
title | Safety and efficacy of inhaled nebulised interferon beta-1a (SNG001) for treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial |
title_full | Safety and efficacy of inhaled nebulised interferon beta-1a (SNG001) for treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial |
title_fullStr | Safety and efficacy of inhaled nebulised interferon beta-1a (SNG001) for treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Safety and efficacy of inhaled nebulised interferon beta-1a (SNG001) for treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial |
title_short | Safety and efficacy of inhaled nebulised interferon beta-1a (SNG001) for treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial |
title_sort | safety and efficacy of inhaled nebulised interferon beta-1a (sng001) for treatment of sars-cov-2 infection: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7836724/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33189161 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30511-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT monkphillipd safetyandefficacyofinhalednebulisedinterferonbeta1asng001fortreatmentofsarscov2infectionarandomiseddoubleblindplacebocontrolledphase2trial AT marsdenrichardj safetyandefficacyofinhalednebulisedinterferonbeta1asng001fortreatmentofsarscov2infectionarandomiseddoubleblindplacebocontrolledphase2trial AT tearvictoriaj safetyandefficacyofinhalednebulisedinterferonbeta1asng001fortreatmentofsarscov2infectionarandomiseddoubleblindplacebocontrolledphase2trial AT brookesjody safetyandefficacyofinhalednebulisedinterferonbeta1asng001fortreatmentofsarscov2infectionarandomiseddoubleblindplacebocontrolledphase2trial AT battentobyn safetyandefficacyofinhalednebulisedinterferonbeta1asng001fortreatmentofsarscov2infectionarandomiseddoubleblindplacebocontrolledphase2trial AT mankowskimarcin safetyandefficacyofinhalednebulisedinterferonbeta1asng001fortreatmentofsarscov2infectionarandomiseddoubleblindplacebocontrolledphase2trial AT gabbayfelicityj safetyandefficacyofinhalednebulisedinterferonbeta1asng001fortreatmentofsarscov2infectionarandomiseddoubleblindplacebocontrolledphase2trial AT daviesdonnae safetyandefficacyofinhalednebulisedinterferonbeta1asng001fortreatmentofsarscov2infectionarandomiseddoubleblindplacebocontrolledphase2trial AT holgatestephent safetyandefficacyofinhalednebulisedinterferonbeta1asng001fortreatmentofsarscov2infectionarandomiseddoubleblindplacebocontrolledphase2trial AT holingpei safetyandefficacyofinhalednebulisedinterferonbeta1asng001fortreatmentofsarscov2infectionarandomiseddoubleblindplacebocontrolledphase2trial AT clarktristan safetyandefficacyofinhalednebulisedinterferonbeta1asng001fortreatmentofsarscov2infectionarandomiseddoubleblindplacebocontrolledphase2trial AT djukanovicratko safetyandefficacyofinhalednebulisedinterferonbeta1asng001fortreatmentofsarscov2infectionarandomiseddoubleblindplacebocontrolledphase2trial AT wilkinsontomma safetyandefficacyofinhalednebulisedinterferonbeta1asng001fortreatmentofsarscov2infectionarandomiseddoubleblindplacebocontrolledphase2trial AT safetyandefficacyofinhalednebulisedinterferonbeta1asng001fortreatmentofsarscov2infectionarandomiseddoubleblindplacebocontrolledphase2trial |