Cargando…
Periprocedural complications in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection compared to those without infection: A nationwide propensity-matched analysis
BACKGROUND: Reports on emergency surgery performed soon after a COVID-19 infection that are not controlled for premorbid risk-factors show increased 30-day mortality and pulmonary complications. This contributed to a virtual cessation of elective surgery during the pandemic surge. To inform evidence...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7836786/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33384154 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.12.024 |
_version_ | 1783642820431577088 |
---|---|
author | Lal, Brajesh K. Prasad, Nikhil K. Englum, Brian R. Turner, Douglas J. Siddiqui, Tariq Carlin, Minerva Mayorga Lake, Rachel Sorkin, John D. |
author_facet | Lal, Brajesh K. Prasad, Nikhil K. Englum, Brian R. Turner, Douglas J. Siddiqui, Tariq Carlin, Minerva Mayorga Lake, Rachel Sorkin, John D. |
author_sort | Lal, Brajesh K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Reports on emergency surgery performed soon after a COVID-19 infection that are not controlled for premorbid risk-factors show increased 30-day mortality and pulmonary complications. This contributed to a virtual cessation of elective surgery during the pandemic surge. To inform evidence-based guidance on the decisions for surgery during the recovery phase of the pandemic, we compare 30-day outcomes in patients testing positive for COVID-19 before their operation, to contemporary propensity-matched COVID-19 negative patients undergoing the same procedures. METHODS: This prospective multicentre study included all patients undergoing surgery at 170 Veterans Health Administration (VA) hospitals across the United States. COVID-19 positive patients were propensity matched to COVID-19 negative patients on demographic and procedural factors. We compared 30-day outcomes between COVID-19 positive and negative patients, and the effect of time from testing positive to the date of procedure (≤10 days, 11–30 days and >30 days) on outcomes. RESULTS: Between March 1 and August 15, 2020, 449 COVID-19 positive and 51,238 negative patients met inclusion criteria. Propensity matching yielded 432 COVID-19 positive and 1256 negative patients among whom half underwent elective surgery. Infected patients had longer hospital stays (median seven days), higher rates of pneumonia (20.6%), ventilator requirement (7.6%), acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS, 17.1%), septic shock (13.7%), and ischemic stroke (5.8%), while mortality, reoperations and readmissions were not significantly different. Higher odds for ventilation and stroke persisted even when surgery was delayed 11–30 days, and for pneumonia, ARDS, and septic shock >30 days after a positive test. DISCUSSION: 30-day pulmonary, septic, and ischaemic complications are increased in COVID-19 positive, compared to propensity score matched negative patients. Odds for several complications persist despite a delay beyond ten days after testing positive. Individualized risk-stratification by pulmonary and atherosclerotic comorbidities should be considered when making decisions for delaying surgery in infected patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7836786 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78367862021-01-26 Periprocedural complications in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection compared to those without infection: A nationwide propensity-matched analysis Lal, Brajesh K. Prasad, Nikhil K. Englum, Brian R. Turner, Douglas J. Siddiqui, Tariq Carlin, Minerva Mayorga Lake, Rachel Sorkin, John D. Am J Surg Original Research Article BACKGROUND: Reports on emergency surgery performed soon after a COVID-19 infection that are not controlled for premorbid risk-factors show increased 30-day mortality and pulmonary complications. This contributed to a virtual cessation of elective surgery during the pandemic surge. To inform evidence-based guidance on the decisions for surgery during the recovery phase of the pandemic, we compare 30-day outcomes in patients testing positive for COVID-19 before their operation, to contemporary propensity-matched COVID-19 negative patients undergoing the same procedures. METHODS: This prospective multicentre study included all patients undergoing surgery at 170 Veterans Health Administration (VA) hospitals across the United States. COVID-19 positive patients were propensity matched to COVID-19 negative patients on demographic and procedural factors. We compared 30-day outcomes between COVID-19 positive and negative patients, and the effect of time from testing positive to the date of procedure (≤10 days, 11–30 days and >30 days) on outcomes. RESULTS: Between March 1 and August 15, 2020, 449 COVID-19 positive and 51,238 negative patients met inclusion criteria. Propensity matching yielded 432 COVID-19 positive and 1256 negative patients among whom half underwent elective surgery. Infected patients had longer hospital stays (median seven days), higher rates of pneumonia (20.6%), ventilator requirement (7.6%), acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS, 17.1%), septic shock (13.7%), and ischemic stroke (5.8%), while mortality, reoperations and readmissions were not significantly different. Higher odds for ventilation and stroke persisted even when surgery was delayed 11–30 days, and for pneumonia, ARDS, and septic shock >30 days after a positive test. DISCUSSION: 30-day pulmonary, septic, and ischaemic complications are increased in COVID-19 positive, compared to propensity score matched negative patients. Odds for several complications persist despite a delay beyond ten days after testing positive. Individualized risk-stratification by pulmonary and atherosclerotic comorbidities should be considered when making decisions for delaying surgery in infected patients. Elsevier Inc. 2021-08 2020-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7836786/ /pubmed/33384154 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.12.024 Text en © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Lal, Brajesh K. Prasad, Nikhil K. Englum, Brian R. Turner, Douglas J. Siddiqui, Tariq Carlin, Minerva Mayorga Lake, Rachel Sorkin, John D. Periprocedural complications in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection compared to those without infection: A nationwide propensity-matched analysis |
title | Periprocedural complications in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection compared to those without infection: A nationwide propensity-matched analysis |
title_full | Periprocedural complications in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection compared to those without infection: A nationwide propensity-matched analysis |
title_fullStr | Periprocedural complications in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection compared to those without infection: A nationwide propensity-matched analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Periprocedural complications in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection compared to those without infection: A nationwide propensity-matched analysis |
title_short | Periprocedural complications in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection compared to those without infection: A nationwide propensity-matched analysis |
title_sort | periprocedural complications in patients with sars-cov-2 infection compared to those without infection: a nationwide propensity-matched analysis |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7836786/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33384154 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.12.024 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lalbrajeshk periproceduralcomplicationsinpatientswithsarscov2infectioncomparedtothosewithoutinfectionanationwidepropensitymatchedanalysis AT prasadnikhilk periproceduralcomplicationsinpatientswithsarscov2infectioncomparedtothosewithoutinfectionanationwidepropensitymatchedanalysis AT englumbrianr periproceduralcomplicationsinpatientswithsarscov2infectioncomparedtothosewithoutinfectionanationwidepropensitymatchedanalysis AT turnerdouglasj periproceduralcomplicationsinpatientswithsarscov2infectioncomparedtothosewithoutinfectionanationwidepropensitymatchedanalysis AT siddiquitariq periproceduralcomplicationsinpatientswithsarscov2infectioncomparedtothosewithoutinfectionanationwidepropensitymatchedanalysis AT carlinminervamayorga periproceduralcomplicationsinpatientswithsarscov2infectioncomparedtothosewithoutinfectionanationwidepropensitymatchedanalysis AT lakerachel periproceduralcomplicationsinpatientswithsarscov2infectioncomparedtothosewithoutinfectionanationwidepropensitymatchedanalysis AT sorkinjohnd periproceduralcomplicationsinpatientswithsarscov2infectioncomparedtothosewithoutinfectionanationwidepropensitymatchedanalysis |