Cargando…

Comparison of the diagnostic sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 nucleoprotein and glycoprotein-based antibody tests

The emergence of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS CoV-2) has been followed by the rapid development of antibody tests. To assess the utility of the tests for clinical use and seroepidemiologic studies, we examined the sensitivity of commercial antibody tests from Roche, Abbo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schnurra, Carolin, Reiners, Nina, Biemann, Ronald, Kaiser, Thorsten, Trawinski, Henning, Jassoy, Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier B.V. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7836838/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32663788
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104544
_version_ 1783642831512928256
author Schnurra, Carolin
Reiners, Nina
Biemann, Ronald
Kaiser, Thorsten
Trawinski, Henning
Jassoy, Christian
author_facet Schnurra, Carolin
Reiners, Nina
Biemann, Ronald
Kaiser, Thorsten
Trawinski, Henning
Jassoy, Christian
author_sort Schnurra, Carolin
collection PubMed
description The emergence of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS CoV-2) has been followed by the rapid development of antibody tests. To assess the utility of the tests for clinical use and seroepidemiologic studies, we examined the sensitivity of commercial antibody tests from Roche, Abbott, Novatec, Virotech Siemens, Euroimmun, and Mediagnost in a prospective diagnostic study. The tests were evaluated with 73 sera from SARS CoV-2 RNA positive individuals with mild to moderate disease or asymptomatic infection. Sera were obtained at 2−3 weeks (N = 25) or > 4 weeks (N = 48) after symptom onset and viral RNA test. The overall sensitivity of the tests ranged from 64.4–93.2%. The most sensitive assays recognized 95.8–100 % of the sera obtained after 4 weeks or later. Sera drawn at 2−3 weeks were recognized with lower sensitivity indicating that the optimal time point for serologic testing is later than 3 weeks after onset of the disease. Nucleoprotein- and glycoproteinbased assays had similar sensitivity indicating that tests with both antigens are suitable for serological diagnostics. Breakdown of the test results showed that nucleoprotein- and glycoprotein-based tests of comparable sensitivity reacted with different sets of sera. The observation indicates that a combination of nucleoprotein- and glycoprotein-based tests would increase the percentage of positive results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7836838
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier B.V.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78368382021-01-26 Comparison of the diagnostic sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 nucleoprotein and glycoprotein-based antibody tests Schnurra, Carolin Reiners, Nina Biemann, Ronald Kaiser, Thorsten Trawinski, Henning Jassoy, Christian J Clin Virol Article The emergence of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS CoV-2) has been followed by the rapid development of antibody tests. To assess the utility of the tests for clinical use and seroepidemiologic studies, we examined the sensitivity of commercial antibody tests from Roche, Abbott, Novatec, Virotech Siemens, Euroimmun, and Mediagnost in a prospective diagnostic study. The tests were evaluated with 73 sera from SARS CoV-2 RNA positive individuals with mild to moderate disease or asymptomatic infection. Sera were obtained at 2−3 weeks (N = 25) or > 4 weeks (N = 48) after symptom onset and viral RNA test. The overall sensitivity of the tests ranged from 64.4–93.2%. The most sensitive assays recognized 95.8–100 % of the sera obtained after 4 weeks or later. Sera drawn at 2−3 weeks were recognized with lower sensitivity indicating that the optimal time point for serologic testing is later than 3 weeks after onset of the disease. Nucleoprotein- and glycoproteinbased assays had similar sensitivity indicating that tests with both antigens are suitable for serological diagnostics. Breakdown of the test results showed that nucleoprotein- and glycoprotein-based tests of comparable sensitivity reacted with different sets of sera. The observation indicates that a combination of nucleoprotein- and glycoprotein-based tests would increase the percentage of positive results. Elsevier B.V. 2020-08 2020-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7836838/ /pubmed/32663788 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104544 Text en © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Schnurra, Carolin
Reiners, Nina
Biemann, Ronald
Kaiser, Thorsten
Trawinski, Henning
Jassoy, Christian
Comparison of the diagnostic sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 nucleoprotein and glycoprotein-based antibody tests
title Comparison of the diagnostic sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 nucleoprotein and glycoprotein-based antibody tests
title_full Comparison of the diagnostic sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 nucleoprotein and glycoprotein-based antibody tests
title_fullStr Comparison of the diagnostic sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 nucleoprotein and glycoprotein-based antibody tests
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the diagnostic sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 nucleoprotein and glycoprotein-based antibody tests
title_short Comparison of the diagnostic sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 nucleoprotein and glycoprotein-based antibody tests
title_sort comparison of the diagnostic sensitivity of sars-cov-2 nucleoprotein and glycoprotein-based antibody tests
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7836838/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32663788
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104544
work_keys_str_mv AT schnurracarolin comparisonofthediagnosticsensitivityofsarscov2nucleoproteinandglycoproteinbasedantibodytests
AT reinersnina comparisonofthediagnosticsensitivityofsarscov2nucleoproteinandglycoproteinbasedantibodytests
AT biemannronald comparisonofthediagnosticsensitivityofsarscov2nucleoproteinandglycoproteinbasedantibodytests
AT kaiserthorsten comparisonofthediagnosticsensitivityofsarscov2nucleoproteinandglycoproteinbasedantibodytests
AT trawinskihenning comparisonofthediagnosticsensitivityofsarscov2nucleoproteinandglycoproteinbasedantibodytests
AT jassoychristian comparisonofthediagnosticsensitivityofsarscov2nucleoproteinandglycoproteinbasedantibodytests