Cargando…
Barrier enclosure use during aerosol-generating medical procedures: A scoping review
INTRODUCTION: Barrier enclosure devices were introduced to protect against infectious disease transmission during aerosol generating medical procedures (AGMP). Recent discussion in the medical community has led to new designs and adoption despite limited evidence. A scoping review was conducted to c...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7837026/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33189515 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2020.10.071 |
_version_ | 1783642872781733888 |
---|---|
author | Price, Courtney Ben-Yakov, Maxim Choi, Joseph Orchanian-Cheff, Ani Tawadrous, Davy |
author_facet | Price, Courtney Ben-Yakov, Maxim Choi, Joseph Orchanian-Cheff, Ani Tawadrous, Davy |
author_sort | Price, Courtney |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Barrier enclosure devices were introduced to protect against infectious disease transmission during aerosol generating medical procedures (AGMP). Recent discussion in the medical community has led to new designs and adoption despite limited evidence. A scoping review was conducted to characterize devices being used and their performance. METHODS: We conducted a scoping review of formal databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, CENTRAL, Scopus), grey literature, and hand-searched relevant journals. Forward and reverse citation searching was completed on included articles. Article/full-text screening and data extraction was performed by two independent reviewers. Studies were categorized by publication type, device category, intended medical use, and outcomes (efficacy – ability to contain particles; efficiency – time to complete AGMP; and usability – user experience). RESULTS: Searches identified 6489 studies and 123 met criteria for inclusion (k = 0.81 title/abstract, k = 0.77 full-text). Most articles were published in 2020 (98%, n = 120) as letters/commentaries (58%, n = 71). Box systems represented 42% (n = 52) of systems described, while plastic sheet systems accounted for 54% (n = 66). The majority were used for airway management (67%, n = 83). Only half of articles described outcome measures (54%, n = 67); 82% (n = 55) reporting efficacy, 39% (n = 26) on usability, and 15% (n = 10) on efficiency. Efficacy of devices in containing aerosols was limited and frequently dependent on use of suction devices. CONCLUSIONS: While use of various barrier enclosure devices has become widespread during this pandemic, objective data of efficacy, efficiency, and usability is limited. Further controlled studies are required before adoption into routine clinical practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7837026 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78370262021-01-26 Barrier enclosure use during aerosol-generating medical procedures: A scoping review Price, Courtney Ben-Yakov, Maxim Choi, Joseph Orchanian-Cheff, Ani Tawadrous, Davy Am J Emerg Med Review Article INTRODUCTION: Barrier enclosure devices were introduced to protect against infectious disease transmission during aerosol generating medical procedures (AGMP). Recent discussion in the medical community has led to new designs and adoption despite limited evidence. A scoping review was conducted to characterize devices being used and their performance. METHODS: We conducted a scoping review of formal databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, CENTRAL, Scopus), grey literature, and hand-searched relevant journals. Forward and reverse citation searching was completed on included articles. Article/full-text screening and data extraction was performed by two independent reviewers. Studies were categorized by publication type, device category, intended medical use, and outcomes (efficacy – ability to contain particles; efficiency – time to complete AGMP; and usability – user experience). RESULTS: Searches identified 6489 studies and 123 met criteria for inclusion (k = 0.81 title/abstract, k = 0.77 full-text). Most articles were published in 2020 (98%, n = 120) as letters/commentaries (58%, n = 71). Box systems represented 42% (n = 52) of systems described, while plastic sheet systems accounted for 54% (n = 66). The majority were used for airway management (67%, n = 83). Only half of articles described outcome measures (54%, n = 67); 82% (n = 55) reporting efficacy, 39% (n = 26) on usability, and 15% (n = 10) on efficiency. Efficacy of devices in containing aerosols was limited and frequently dependent on use of suction devices. CONCLUSIONS: While use of various barrier enclosure devices has become widespread during this pandemic, objective data of efficacy, efficiency, and usability is limited. Further controlled studies are required before adoption into routine clinical practice. Elsevier Inc. 2021-03 2020-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7837026/ /pubmed/33189515 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2020.10.071 Text en © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Price, Courtney Ben-Yakov, Maxim Choi, Joseph Orchanian-Cheff, Ani Tawadrous, Davy Barrier enclosure use during aerosol-generating medical procedures: A scoping review |
title | Barrier enclosure use during aerosol-generating medical procedures: A scoping review |
title_full | Barrier enclosure use during aerosol-generating medical procedures: A scoping review |
title_fullStr | Barrier enclosure use during aerosol-generating medical procedures: A scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed | Barrier enclosure use during aerosol-generating medical procedures: A scoping review |
title_short | Barrier enclosure use during aerosol-generating medical procedures: A scoping review |
title_sort | barrier enclosure use during aerosol-generating medical procedures: a scoping review |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7837026/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33189515 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2020.10.071 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pricecourtney barrierenclosureuseduringaerosolgeneratingmedicalproceduresascopingreview AT benyakovmaxim barrierenclosureuseduringaerosolgeneratingmedicalproceduresascopingreview AT choijoseph barrierenclosureuseduringaerosolgeneratingmedicalproceduresascopingreview AT orchaniancheffani barrierenclosureuseduringaerosolgeneratingmedicalproceduresascopingreview AT tawadrousdavy barrierenclosureuseduringaerosolgeneratingmedicalproceduresascopingreview |