Cargando…

The efficacy and safety of local infiltration analgesia vs femoral nerve block after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A retrospective trial protocol

BACKGROUND: Several previous trials have attempted to compare the efficacy of femoral nerve block (FNB) and local infiltrative analgesia (LIA) for patients received anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, but reached inconsistent conclusions. The primary purpose of this present research was...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Juan, Wang, Xiaowei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7837884/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33545958
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000023895
_version_ 1783643045861785600
author Chen, Juan
Wang, Xiaowei
author_facet Chen, Juan
Wang, Xiaowei
author_sort Chen, Juan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Several previous trials have attempted to compare the efficacy of femoral nerve block (FNB) and local infiltrative analgesia (LIA) for patients received anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, but reached inconsistent conclusions. The primary purpose of this present research was to compare the FNB and LIA in the reconstruction of ACL. METHODS: This investigation was conducted and then reported on the basis of Strengthening the Reporting of Observational studies in the Epidemiology checklist. From our registry database, we retrospectively determined 688 patients who received the primary reconstruction of ACL from 2016 to 2019 at our academic institutions. This current retrospective cohort study was approved through the institutional review committee at our hospital. Inclusion criteria contained the primary or autograft bone-patellar tendine-bone reconstruction of ACL in the patients over 16 years of age. Patients in the LIA group underwent intraoperative infiltration at the harvested site after tendon harvest, with use of 2 mg/mL of ropivacaine 20 mL and 5 mg/mL of epinephrine, respectively. After the reconstruction of ACL, 5 Lg/mL of epinephrine, and 20 mL of ropivacaine (2 mg/mL) were injected at the site of surgical trauma. The patient in FNB group was given 40 mL of ropivacaine (2 mg/mL), and the ropivacaine was injected into femoral nerve sheath at femoral triangle level. The primary outcome was the consumption of morphine 24 h after the operation. And the secondary results involved the complications, functional results, and the scores of pain. RESULTS: It is assumed that the efficacy of LIA in the early postoperative pain is no less than that of FNB. For our study, the major limitation is the lack of randomization. Nevertheless, these data were prospectively harvested, with high response rate of patient. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study protocol was registered in Research Registry (researchregistry6277).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7837884
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78378842021-01-27 The efficacy and safety of local infiltration analgesia vs femoral nerve block after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A retrospective trial protocol Chen, Juan Wang, Xiaowei Medicine (Baltimore) 7000 BACKGROUND: Several previous trials have attempted to compare the efficacy of femoral nerve block (FNB) and local infiltrative analgesia (LIA) for patients received anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, but reached inconsistent conclusions. The primary purpose of this present research was to compare the FNB and LIA in the reconstruction of ACL. METHODS: This investigation was conducted and then reported on the basis of Strengthening the Reporting of Observational studies in the Epidemiology checklist. From our registry database, we retrospectively determined 688 patients who received the primary reconstruction of ACL from 2016 to 2019 at our academic institutions. This current retrospective cohort study was approved through the institutional review committee at our hospital. Inclusion criteria contained the primary or autograft bone-patellar tendine-bone reconstruction of ACL in the patients over 16 years of age. Patients in the LIA group underwent intraoperative infiltration at the harvested site after tendon harvest, with use of 2 mg/mL of ropivacaine 20 mL and 5 mg/mL of epinephrine, respectively. After the reconstruction of ACL, 5 Lg/mL of epinephrine, and 20 mL of ropivacaine (2 mg/mL) were injected at the site of surgical trauma. The patient in FNB group was given 40 mL of ropivacaine (2 mg/mL), and the ropivacaine was injected into femoral nerve sheath at femoral triangle level. The primary outcome was the consumption of morphine 24 h after the operation. And the secondary results involved the complications, functional results, and the scores of pain. RESULTS: It is assumed that the efficacy of LIA in the early postoperative pain is no less than that of FNB. For our study, the major limitation is the lack of randomization. Nevertheless, these data were prospectively harvested, with high response rate of patient. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study protocol was registered in Research Registry (researchregistry6277). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-01-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7837884/ /pubmed/33545958 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000023895 Text en Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
spellingShingle 7000
Chen, Juan
Wang, Xiaowei
The efficacy and safety of local infiltration analgesia vs femoral nerve block after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A retrospective trial protocol
title The efficacy and safety of local infiltration analgesia vs femoral nerve block after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A retrospective trial protocol
title_full The efficacy and safety of local infiltration analgesia vs femoral nerve block after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A retrospective trial protocol
title_fullStr The efficacy and safety of local infiltration analgesia vs femoral nerve block after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A retrospective trial protocol
title_full_unstemmed The efficacy and safety of local infiltration analgesia vs femoral nerve block after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A retrospective trial protocol
title_short The efficacy and safety of local infiltration analgesia vs femoral nerve block after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A retrospective trial protocol
title_sort efficacy and safety of local infiltration analgesia vs femoral nerve block after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a retrospective trial protocol
topic 7000
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7837884/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33545958
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000023895
work_keys_str_mv AT chenjuan theefficacyandsafetyoflocalinfiltrationanalgesiavsfemoralnerveblockafteranteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionaretrospectivetrialprotocol
AT wangxiaowei theefficacyandsafetyoflocalinfiltrationanalgesiavsfemoralnerveblockafteranteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionaretrospectivetrialprotocol
AT chenjuan efficacyandsafetyoflocalinfiltrationanalgesiavsfemoralnerveblockafteranteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionaretrospectivetrialprotocol
AT wangxiaowei efficacyandsafetyoflocalinfiltrationanalgesiavsfemoralnerveblockafteranteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionaretrospectivetrialprotocol