Cargando…
The self-psychological safety maintenance and its influencing factors of community frontline staff during COVID-19 pandemic
The present study was designed to determine the self-psychological safety maintenance and its influencing factors of community staff on the front-line during Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. A total of 126 frontline staff in community were involved in the current cross-section study. On...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7837898/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33546028 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000024140 |
_version_ | 1783643049219325952 |
---|---|
author | Xia, Yinghua Zhang, Hao Xia, Yingjie Li, Hui Zhai, Lili Wang, Hong |
author_facet | Xia, Yinghua Zhang, Hao Xia, Yingjie Li, Hui Zhai, Lili Wang, Hong |
author_sort | Xia, Yinghua |
collection | PubMed |
description | The present study was designed to determine the self-psychological safety maintenance and its influencing factors of community staff on the front-line during Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. A total of 126 frontline staff in community were involved in the current cross-section study. Online questionnaires including the anxiety sensitivity index-3 (ASI-3), patient health questionnaire (PHQ-9), simple coping style questionnaire (SCSQ) and general self-efficacy scale (GSES) were utilized to analyze psychological state, coping style and self-efficacy of the surveyed staff. The ASI-3 standard score of 126 community frontline staff was 10.01 ± 2.82, of which 21 community frontline staff scored > 16, and the detection rate of anxiety was 16.67%. The anxiety state of doctors and nursing staff was significantly lower than that of administrative staff, logistics staff and other staff, and the rate of anxiety of having colleagues with suspected symptoms was significantly higher than that without colleagues with suspected symptoms (P < .05). The PHQ-9 standard score was 2.03 ± 0.16, of which 19 frontline staff in the community scored more than 5, and the detection rate of depression was 15.08%. Among them, the depression state of those with bachelor degree or above was significantly lower than that of those with junior college education, and the rate of depressive symptoms of community frontline staff with colleagues harboring suspected symptoms were significantly higher than those without colleagues with suspected symptoms (P < .05). The aggregated results showed that most of the community frontline staff in anxiety state group and depression group adopted negative coping style while most of the community frontline staff in the non-anxiety group and the non-depression group adopted positive coping style (P < .05). Additionally, lower score of self-efficacy of the community frontline staff was observed in the anxiety state group and the depression state group (P < .05). During the outbreak of COVID-19, several community frontline staff showed negative psychology of anxiety and depression, which could affect their coping style and self-efficacy. Early and effective psychological safety maintenance was required to alleviate the negative psychology of community frontline staff. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7837898 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78378982021-01-27 The self-psychological safety maintenance and its influencing factors of community frontline staff during COVID-19 pandemic Xia, Yinghua Zhang, Hao Xia, Yingjie Li, Hui Zhai, Lili Wang, Hong Medicine (Baltimore) 5000 The present study was designed to determine the self-psychological safety maintenance and its influencing factors of community staff on the front-line during Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. A total of 126 frontline staff in community were involved in the current cross-section study. Online questionnaires including the anxiety sensitivity index-3 (ASI-3), patient health questionnaire (PHQ-9), simple coping style questionnaire (SCSQ) and general self-efficacy scale (GSES) were utilized to analyze psychological state, coping style and self-efficacy of the surveyed staff. The ASI-3 standard score of 126 community frontline staff was 10.01 ± 2.82, of which 21 community frontline staff scored > 16, and the detection rate of anxiety was 16.67%. The anxiety state of doctors and nursing staff was significantly lower than that of administrative staff, logistics staff and other staff, and the rate of anxiety of having colleagues with suspected symptoms was significantly higher than that without colleagues with suspected symptoms (P < .05). The PHQ-9 standard score was 2.03 ± 0.16, of which 19 frontline staff in the community scored more than 5, and the detection rate of depression was 15.08%. Among them, the depression state of those with bachelor degree or above was significantly lower than that of those with junior college education, and the rate of depressive symptoms of community frontline staff with colleagues harboring suspected symptoms were significantly higher than those without colleagues with suspected symptoms (P < .05). The aggregated results showed that most of the community frontline staff in anxiety state group and depression group adopted negative coping style while most of the community frontline staff in the non-anxiety group and the non-depression group adopted positive coping style (P < .05). Additionally, lower score of self-efficacy of the community frontline staff was observed in the anxiety state group and the depression state group (P < .05). During the outbreak of COVID-19, several community frontline staff showed negative psychology of anxiety and depression, which could affect their coping style and self-efficacy. Early and effective psychological safety maintenance was required to alleviate the negative psychology of community frontline staff. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-01-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7837898/ /pubmed/33546028 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000024140 Text en Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
spellingShingle | 5000 Xia, Yinghua Zhang, Hao Xia, Yingjie Li, Hui Zhai, Lili Wang, Hong The self-psychological safety maintenance and its influencing factors of community frontline staff during COVID-19 pandemic |
title | The self-psychological safety maintenance and its influencing factors of community frontline staff during COVID-19 pandemic |
title_full | The self-psychological safety maintenance and its influencing factors of community frontline staff during COVID-19 pandemic |
title_fullStr | The self-psychological safety maintenance and its influencing factors of community frontline staff during COVID-19 pandemic |
title_full_unstemmed | The self-psychological safety maintenance and its influencing factors of community frontline staff during COVID-19 pandemic |
title_short | The self-psychological safety maintenance and its influencing factors of community frontline staff during COVID-19 pandemic |
title_sort | self-psychological safety maintenance and its influencing factors of community frontline staff during covid-19 pandemic |
topic | 5000 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7837898/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33546028 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000024140 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT xiayinghua theselfpsychologicalsafetymaintenanceanditsinfluencingfactorsofcommunityfrontlinestaffduringcovid19pandemic AT zhanghao theselfpsychologicalsafetymaintenanceanditsinfluencingfactorsofcommunityfrontlinestaffduringcovid19pandemic AT xiayingjie theselfpsychologicalsafetymaintenanceanditsinfluencingfactorsofcommunityfrontlinestaffduringcovid19pandemic AT lihui theselfpsychologicalsafetymaintenanceanditsinfluencingfactorsofcommunityfrontlinestaffduringcovid19pandemic AT zhailili theselfpsychologicalsafetymaintenanceanditsinfluencingfactorsofcommunityfrontlinestaffduringcovid19pandemic AT wanghong theselfpsychologicalsafetymaintenanceanditsinfluencingfactorsofcommunityfrontlinestaffduringcovid19pandemic AT xiayinghua selfpsychologicalsafetymaintenanceanditsinfluencingfactorsofcommunityfrontlinestaffduringcovid19pandemic AT zhanghao selfpsychologicalsafetymaintenanceanditsinfluencingfactorsofcommunityfrontlinestaffduringcovid19pandemic AT xiayingjie selfpsychologicalsafetymaintenanceanditsinfluencingfactorsofcommunityfrontlinestaffduringcovid19pandemic AT lihui selfpsychologicalsafetymaintenanceanditsinfluencingfactorsofcommunityfrontlinestaffduringcovid19pandemic AT zhailili selfpsychologicalsafetymaintenanceanditsinfluencingfactorsofcommunityfrontlinestaffduringcovid19pandemic AT wanghong selfpsychologicalsafetymaintenanceanditsinfluencingfactorsofcommunityfrontlinestaffduringcovid19pandemic |