Cargando…

Gemcitabine Plus Vinorelbine as Second-Line Therapy in Patients With Metastatic Esophageal Cancer Previously Treated With Platinum-Based Chemotherapy

We evaluated the efficacy and feasibility of the combination of gemcitabine plus vinorelbine in patients with platinum-based chemotherapy-refractory esophageal cancer. We enrolled 35 patients who received gemcitabine plus vinorelbine as second-line treatment after platinum-based chemotherapy failure...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Yue-shen, Tian, Jing, Han, Yong, Han, Shu-mei, Shi, Sheng-bin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cognizant Communication Corporation 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7838740/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27296953
http://dx.doi.org/10.3727/096504016X14618564639213
_version_ 1783643250092933120
author Wang, Yue-shen
Tian, Jing
Han, Yong
Han, Shu-mei
Shi, Sheng-bin
author_facet Wang, Yue-shen
Tian, Jing
Han, Yong
Han, Shu-mei
Shi, Sheng-bin
author_sort Wang, Yue-shen
collection PubMed
description We evaluated the efficacy and feasibility of the combination of gemcitabine plus vinorelbine in patients with platinum-based chemotherapy-refractory esophageal cancer. We enrolled 35 patients who received gemcitabine plus vinorelbine as second-line treatment after platinum-based chemotherapy failure between May 2009 and April 2012. Dosage: gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) plus vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2); all drugs were administered on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle, and this was continued until failure or unacceptable toxicity. A total of 125 cycles of treatment were administered, and all patients received at least two cycles of treatment (two to five cycles; median number of cycles: three). Thirty-two patients were evaluable for response. The response rate was 31.3%, and the disease control rate (partial response plus stable disease) was 62.5%. The progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.3 ± 0.2 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 4.0–4.6], and the median overall survival (OS) was 7.3 ± 0.3 months (95% CI, 6.7–7.8). In the subgroup analysis, median PFS was 4.0 ± 0.2 months (95% CI, 3.6–4.3) in patients with high expression of miRNA-214, while it was 4.6 ± 0.3 months (95% CI, 4.1–5.1) in patients with low expression of miRNA-214 (log rank = 0.023). Myelosuppression with neutropenia and thrombocytopenia was the most common side effect observed with this combination regimen, and higher than grade 3 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were observed in 10 (31.3%) and 8 patients (25.0%), respectively. Grade 3 fatigue was the most common nonhematologic toxicity, which was observed in 2 (6.1%) patients. The combination of gemcitabine plus vinorelbine was well tolerated as second-line treatment for platinum-based chemotherapy-refractory esophageal cancer patients and appeared to provide enhanced clinical activity especially in patients with low expression of miRNA-214.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7838740
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Cognizant Communication Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78387402021-02-16 Gemcitabine Plus Vinorelbine as Second-Line Therapy in Patients With Metastatic Esophageal Cancer Previously Treated With Platinum-Based Chemotherapy Wang, Yue-shen Tian, Jing Han, Yong Han, Shu-mei Shi, Sheng-bin Oncol Res Article We evaluated the efficacy and feasibility of the combination of gemcitabine plus vinorelbine in patients with platinum-based chemotherapy-refractory esophageal cancer. We enrolled 35 patients who received gemcitabine plus vinorelbine as second-line treatment after platinum-based chemotherapy failure between May 2009 and April 2012. Dosage: gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) plus vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2); all drugs were administered on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle, and this was continued until failure or unacceptable toxicity. A total of 125 cycles of treatment were administered, and all patients received at least two cycles of treatment (two to five cycles; median number of cycles: three). Thirty-two patients were evaluable for response. The response rate was 31.3%, and the disease control rate (partial response plus stable disease) was 62.5%. The progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.3 ± 0.2 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 4.0–4.6], and the median overall survival (OS) was 7.3 ± 0.3 months (95% CI, 6.7–7.8). In the subgroup analysis, median PFS was 4.0 ± 0.2 months (95% CI, 3.6–4.3) in patients with high expression of miRNA-214, while it was 4.6 ± 0.3 months (95% CI, 4.1–5.1) in patients with low expression of miRNA-214 (log rank = 0.023). Myelosuppression with neutropenia and thrombocytopenia was the most common side effect observed with this combination regimen, and higher than grade 3 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were observed in 10 (31.3%) and 8 patients (25.0%), respectively. Grade 3 fatigue was the most common nonhematologic toxicity, which was observed in 2 (6.1%) patients. The combination of gemcitabine plus vinorelbine was well tolerated as second-line treatment for platinum-based chemotherapy-refractory esophageal cancer patients and appeared to provide enhanced clinical activity especially in patients with low expression of miRNA-214. Cognizant Communication Corporation 2016-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7838740/ /pubmed/27296953 http://dx.doi.org/10.3727/096504016X14618564639213 Text en Copyright © 2016 Cognizant, LLC. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Article
Wang, Yue-shen
Tian, Jing
Han, Yong
Han, Shu-mei
Shi, Sheng-bin
Gemcitabine Plus Vinorelbine as Second-Line Therapy in Patients With Metastatic Esophageal Cancer Previously Treated With Platinum-Based Chemotherapy
title Gemcitabine Plus Vinorelbine as Second-Line Therapy in Patients With Metastatic Esophageal Cancer Previously Treated With Platinum-Based Chemotherapy
title_full Gemcitabine Plus Vinorelbine as Second-Line Therapy in Patients With Metastatic Esophageal Cancer Previously Treated With Platinum-Based Chemotherapy
title_fullStr Gemcitabine Plus Vinorelbine as Second-Line Therapy in Patients With Metastatic Esophageal Cancer Previously Treated With Platinum-Based Chemotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Gemcitabine Plus Vinorelbine as Second-Line Therapy in Patients With Metastatic Esophageal Cancer Previously Treated With Platinum-Based Chemotherapy
title_short Gemcitabine Plus Vinorelbine as Second-Line Therapy in Patients With Metastatic Esophageal Cancer Previously Treated With Platinum-Based Chemotherapy
title_sort gemcitabine plus vinorelbine as second-line therapy in patients with metastatic esophageal cancer previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7838740/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27296953
http://dx.doi.org/10.3727/096504016X14618564639213
work_keys_str_mv AT wangyueshen gemcitabineplusvinorelbineassecondlinetherapyinpatientswithmetastaticesophagealcancerpreviouslytreatedwithplatinumbasedchemotherapy
AT tianjing gemcitabineplusvinorelbineassecondlinetherapyinpatientswithmetastaticesophagealcancerpreviouslytreatedwithplatinumbasedchemotherapy
AT hanyong gemcitabineplusvinorelbineassecondlinetherapyinpatientswithmetastaticesophagealcancerpreviouslytreatedwithplatinumbasedchemotherapy
AT hanshumei gemcitabineplusvinorelbineassecondlinetherapyinpatientswithmetastaticesophagealcancerpreviouslytreatedwithplatinumbasedchemotherapy
AT shishengbin gemcitabineplusvinorelbineassecondlinetherapyinpatientswithmetastaticesophagealcancerpreviouslytreatedwithplatinumbasedchemotherapy