Cargando…
Gemcitabine Plus Vinorelbine as Second-Line Therapy in Patients With Metastatic Esophageal Cancer Previously Treated With Platinum-Based Chemotherapy
We evaluated the efficacy and feasibility of the combination of gemcitabine plus vinorelbine in patients with platinum-based chemotherapy-refractory esophageal cancer. We enrolled 35 patients who received gemcitabine plus vinorelbine as second-line treatment after platinum-based chemotherapy failure...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cognizant Communication Corporation
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7838740/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27296953 http://dx.doi.org/10.3727/096504016X14618564639213 |
_version_ | 1783643250092933120 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Yue-shen Tian, Jing Han, Yong Han, Shu-mei Shi, Sheng-bin |
author_facet | Wang, Yue-shen Tian, Jing Han, Yong Han, Shu-mei Shi, Sheng-bin |
author_sort | Wang, Yue-shen |
collection | PubMed |
description | We evaluated the efficacy and feasibility of the combination of gemcitabine plus vinorelbine in patients with platinum-based chemotherapy-refractory esophageal cancer. We enrolled 35 patients who received gemcitabine plus vinorelbine as second-line treatment after platinum-based chemotherapy failure between May 2009 and April 2012. Dosage: gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) plus vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2); all drugs were administered on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle, and this was continued until failure or unacceptable toxicity. A total of 125 cycles of treatment were administered, and all patients received at least two cycles of treatment (two to five cycles; median number of cycles: three). Thirty-two patients were evaluable for response. The response rate was 31.3%, and the disease control rate (partial response plus stable disease) was 62.5%. The progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.3 ± 0.2 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 4.0–4.6], and the median overall survival (OS) was 7.3 ± 0.3 months (95% CI, 6.7–7.8). In the subgroup analysis, median PFS was 4.0 ± 0.2 months (95% CI, 3.6–4.3) in patients with high expression of miRNA-214, while it was 4.6 ± 0.3 months (95% CI, 4.1–5.1) in patients with low expression of miRNA-214 (log rank = 0.023). Myelosuppression with neutropenia and thrombocytopenia was the most common side effect observed with this combination regimen, and higher than grade 3 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were observed in 10 (31.3%) and 8 patients (25.0%), respectively. Grade 3 fatigue was the most common nonhematologic toxicity, which was observed in 2 (6.1%) patients. The combination of gemcitabine plus vinorelbine was well tolerated as second-line treatment for platinum-based chemotherapy-refractory esophageal cancer patients and appeared to provide enhanced clinical activity especially in patients with low expression of miRNA-214. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7838740 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Cognizant Communication Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78387402021-02-16 Gemcitabine Plus Vinorelbine as Second-Line Therapy in Patients With Metastatic Esophageal Cancer Previously Treated With Platinum-Based Chemotherapy Wang, Yue-shen Tian, Jing Han, Yong Han, Shu-mei Shi, Sheng-bin Oncol Res Article We evaluated the efficacy and feasibility of the combination of gemcitabine plus vinorelbine in patients with platinum-based chemotherapy-refractory esophageal cancer. We enrolled 35 patients who received gemcitabine plus vinorelbine as second-line treatment after platinum-based chemotherapy failure between May 2009 and April 2012. Dosage: gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) plus vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2); all drugs were administered on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle, and this was continued until failure or unacceptable toxicity. A total of 125 cycles of treatment were administered, and all patients received at least two cycles of treatment (two to five cycles; median number of cycles: three). Thirty-two patients were evaluable for response. The response rate was 31.3%, and the disease control rate (partial response plus stable disease) was 62.5%. The progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.3 ± 0.2 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 4.0–4.6], and the median overall survival (OS) was 7.3 ± 0.3 months (95% CI, 6.7–7.8). In the subgroup analysis, median PFS was 4.0 ± 0.2 months (95% CI, 3.6–4.3) in patients with high expression of miRNA-214, while it was 4.6 ± 0.3 months (95% CI, 4.1–5.1) in patients with low expression of miRNA-214 (log rank = 0.023). Myelosuppression with neutropenia and thrombocytopenia was the most common side effect observed with this combination regimen, and higher than grade 3 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were observed in 10 (31.3%) and 8 patients (25.0%), respectively. Grade 3 fatigue was the most common nonhematologic toxicity, which was observed in 2 (6.1%) patients. The combination of gemcitabine plus vinorelbine was well tolerated as second-line treatment for platinum-based chemotherapy-refractory esophageal cancer patients and appeared to provide enhanced clinical activity especially in patients with low expression of miRNA-214. Cognizant Communication Corporation 2016-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7838740/ /pubmed/27296953 http://dx.doi.org/10.3727/096504016X14618564639213 Text en Copyright © 2016 Cognizant, LLC. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. |
spellingShingle | Article Wang, Yue-shen Tian, Jing Han, Yong Han, Shu-mei Shi, Sheng-bin Gemcitabine Plus Vinorelbine as Second-Line Therapy in Patients With Metastatic Esophageal Cancer Previously Treated With Platinum-Based Chemotherapy |
title | Gemcitabine Plus Vinorelbine as Second-Line Therapy in Patients With Metastatic Esophageal Cancer Previously Treated With Platinum-Based Chemotherapy |
title_full | Gemcitabine Plus Vinorelbine as Second-Line Therapy in Patients With Metastatic Esophageal Cancer Previously Treated With Platinum-Based Chemotherapy |
title_fullStr | Gemcitabine Plus Vinorelbine as Second-Line Therapy in Patients With Metastatic Esophageal Cancer Previously Treated With Platinum-Based Chemotherapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Gemcitabine Plus Vinorelbine as Second-Line Therapy in Patients With Metastatic Esophageal Cancer Previously Treated With Platinum-Based Chemotherapy |
title_short | Gemcitabine Plus Vinorelbine as Second-Line Therapy in Patients With Metastatic Esophageal Cancer Previously Treated With Platinum-Based Chemotherapy |
title_sort | gemcitabine plus vinorelbine as second-line therapy in patients with metastatic esophageal cancer previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7838740/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27296953 http://dx.doi.org/10.3727/096504016X14618564639213 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangyueshen gemcitabineplusvinorelbineassecondlinetherapyinpatientswithmetastaticesophagealcancerpreviouslytreatedwithplatinumbasedchemotherapy AT tianjing gemcitabineplusvinorelbineassecondlinetherapyinpatientswithmetastaticesophagealcancerpreviouslytreatedwithplatinumbasedchemotherapy AT hanyong gemcitabineplusvinorelbineassecondlinetherapyinpatientswithmetastaticesophagealcancerpreviouslytreatedwithplatinumbasedchemotherapy AT hanshumei gemcitabineplusvinorelbineassecondlinetherapyinpatientswithmetastaticesophagealcancerpreviouslytreatedwithplatinumbasedchemotherapy AT shishengbin gemcitabineplusvinorelbineassecondlinetherapyinpatientswithmetastaticesophagealcancerpreviouslytreatedwithplatinumbasedchemotherapy |