Cargando…
Measurement of Head Circumference: Implications for Microcephaly Surveillance in Zika-Affected Areas
Worldwide recognition of the Zika virus outbreak in the Americas was triggered by an unexplained increase in the frequency of microcephaly. While severe microcephaly is readily identifiable at birth, diagnosing less severe cases requires comparison of head circumference (HC) measurement to a growth...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7838815/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33383742 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed6010005 |
_version_ | 1783643269055381504 |
---|---|
author | Harville, Emily W. Tong, Van T. Gilboa, Suzanne M. Moore, Cynthia A. Cafferata, Maria Luisa Alger, Jackeline Gibbons, Luz Bustillo, Carolina Callejas, Allison Castillo, Mario Fúnes, Jenny García, Jorge Hernández, Gustavo López, Wendy Ochoa, Carlos Rico, Fátima Rodríguez, Heriberto Zúniga, Concepción Ciganda, Alvaro Stella, Candela Tomasso, Giselle Buekens, Pierre |
author_facet | Harville, Emily W. Tong, Van T. Gilboa, Suzanne M. Moore, Cynthia A. Cafferata, Maria Luisa Alger, Jackeline Gibbons, Luz Bustillo, Carolina Callejas, Allison Castillo, Mario Fúnes, Jenny García, Jorge Hernández, Gustavo López, Wendy Ochoa, Carlos Rico, Fátima Rodríguez, Heriberto Zúniga, Concepción Ciganda, Alvaro Stella, Candela Tomasso, Giselle Buekens, Pierre |
author_sort | Harville, Emily W. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Worldwide recognition of the Zika virus outbreak in the Americas was triggered by an unexplained increase in the frequency of microcephaly. While severe microcephaly is readily identifiable at birth, diagnosing less severe cases requires comparison of head circumference (HC) measurement to a growth chart. We examine measured values of HC and digit preference in those values, and, by extension, the prevalence of microcephaly at birth in two data sources: a research study in Honduras and routine surveillance data in Uruguay. The Zika in Pregnancy in Honduras study enrolled pregnant women prenatally and followed them until delivery. Head circumference was measured with insertion tapes (SECA 212), and instructions including consistent placement of the tape and a request to record HC to the millimeter were posted where newborns were examined. Three indicators of microcephaly were calculated: (1) HC more than 2 standard deviations (SD) below the mean, (2) HC more than 3 SD below the mean (referred to as “severe microcephaly”) and (3) HC less than the 3rd percentile for sex and gestational age, using the INTERGROWTH-21st growth standards. We compared these results from those from a previous analysis of surveillance HC data from the Uruguay Perinatal Information System (Sistema Informático Perinatal (SIP). Valid data on HC were available on 579 infants, 578 with gestational age data. Nine babies (1.56%, 95% CI 0.71–2.93) had HC < 2SD, including two (0.35%, 95% CI 0.04–1.24) with HC < 3SD, and 11 (1.9%, 95% CI, 0.79–3.02) were below the 3rd percentile. The distribution of HC showed strong digit preference: 72% of measures were to the whole centimeter (cm) and 19% to the half-cm. Training and use of insertion tapes had little effect on digit preference, nor were overall HC curves sufficient to detect an increase in microcephaly during the Zika epidemic in Honduras. When microcephaly prevalence needs to be carefully analyzed, such as during the Zika epidemic, researchers may need to interpret HC data with caution. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7838815 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78388152021-01-28 Measurement of Head Circumference: Implications for Microcephaly Surveillance in Zika-Affected Areas Harville, Emily W. Tong, Van T. Gilboa, Suzanne M. Moore, Cynthia A. Cafferata, Maria Luisa Alger, Jackeline Gibbons, Luz Bustillo, Carolina Callejas, Allison Castillo, Mario Fúnes, Jenny García, Jorge Hernández, Gustavo López, Wendy Ochoa, Carlos Rico, Fátima Rodríguez, Heriberto Zúniga, Concepción Ciganda, Alvaro Stella, Candela Tomasso, Giselle Buekens, Pierre Trop Med Infect Dis Article Worldwide recognition of the Zika virus outbreak in the Americas was triggered by an unexplained increase in the frequency of microcephaly. While severe microcephaly is readily identifiable at birth, diagnosing less severe cases requires comparison of head circumference (HC) measurement to a growth chart. We examine measured values of HC and digit preference in those values, and, by extension, the prevalence of microcephaly at birth in two data sources: a research study in Honduras and routine surveillance data in Uruguay. The Zika in Pregnancy in Honduras study enrolled pregnant women prenatally and followed them until delivery. Head circumference was measured with insertion tapes (SECA 212), and instructions including consistent placement of the tape and a request to record HC to the millimeter were posted where newborns were examined. Three indicators of microcephaly were calculated: (1) HC more than 2 standard deviations (SD) below the mean, (2) HC more than 3 SD below the mean (referred to as “severe microcephaly”) and (3) HC less than the 3rd percentile for sex and gestational age, using the INTERGROWTH-21st growth standards. We compared these results from those from a previous analysis of surveillance HC data from the Uruguay Perinatal Information System (Sistema Informático Perinatal (SIP). Valid data on HC were available on 579 infants, 578 with gestational age data. Nine babies (1.56%, 95% CI 0.71–2.93) had HC < 2SD, including two (0.35%, 95% CI 0.04–1.24) with HC < 3SD, and 11 (1.9%, 95% CI, 0.79–3.02) were below the 3rd percentile. The distribution of HC showed strong digit preference: 72% of measures were to the whole centimeter (cm) and 19% to the half-cm. Training and use of insertion tapes had little effect on digit preference, nor were overall HC curves sufficient to detect an increase in microcephaly during the Zika epidemic in Honduras. When microcephaly prevalence needs to be carefully analyzed, such as during the Zika epidemic, researchers may need to interpret HC data with caution. MDPI 2020-12-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7838815/ /pubmed/33383742 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed6010005 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Harville, Emily W. Tong, Van T. Gilboa, Suzanne M. Moore, Cynthia A. Cafferata, Maria Luisa Alger, Jackeline Gibbons, Luz Bustillo, Carolina Callejas, Allison Castillo, Mario Fúnes, Jenny García, Jorge Hernández, Gustavo López, Wendy Ochoa, Carlos Rico, Fátima Rodríguez, Heriberto Zúniga, Concepción Ciganda, Alvaro Stella, Candela Tomasso, Giselle Buekens, Pierre Measurement of Head Circumference: Implications for Microcephaly Surveillance in Zika-Affected Areas |
title | Measurement of Head Circumference: Implications for Microcephaly Surveillance in Zika-Affected Areas |
title_full | Measurement of Head Circumference: Implications for Microcephaly Surveillance in Zika-Affected Areas |
title_fullStr | Measurement of Head Circumference: Implications for Microcephaly Surveillance in Zika-Affected Areas |
title_full_unstemmed | Measurement of Head Circumference: Implications for Microcephaly Surveillance in Zika-Affected Areas |
title_short | Measurement of Head Circumference: Implications for Microcephaly Surveillance in Zika-Affected Areas |
title_sort | measurement of head circumference: implications for microcephaly surveillance in zika-affected areas |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7838815/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33383742 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed6010005 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT harvilleemilyw measurementofheadcircumferenceimplicationsformicrocephalysurveillanceinzikaaffectedareas AT tongvant measurementofheadcircumferenceimplicationsformicrocephalysurveillanceinzikaaffectedareas AT gilboasuzannem measurementofheadcircumferenceimplicationsformicrocephalysurveillanceinzikaaffectedareas AT moorecynthiaa measurementofheadcircumferenceimplicationsformicrocephalysurveillanceinzikaaffectedareas AT cafferatamarialuisa measurementofheadcircumferenceimplicationsformicrocephalysurveillanceinzikaaffectedareas AT algerjackeline measurementofheadcircumferenceimplicationsformicrocephalysurveillanceinzikaaffectedareas AT gibbonsluz measurementofheadcircumferenceimplicationsformicrocephalysurveillanceinzikaaffectedareas AT bustillocarolina measurementofheadcircumferenceimplicationsformicrocephalysurveillanceinzikaaffectedareas AT callejasallison measurementofheadcircumferenceimplicationsformicrocephalysurveillanceinzikaaffectedareas AT castillomario measurementofheadcircumferenceimplicationsformicrocephalysurveillanceinzikaaffectedareas AT funesjenny measurementofheadcircumferenceimplicationsformicrocephalysurveillanceinzikaaffectedareas AT garciajorge measurementofheadcircumferenceimplicationsformicrocephalysurveillanceinzikaaffectedareas AT hernandezgustavo measurementofheadcircumferenceimplicationsformicrocephalysurveillanceinzikaaffectedareas AT lopezwendy measurementofheadcircumferenceimplicationsformicrocephalysurveillanceinzikaaffectedareas AT ochoacarlos measurementofheadcircumferenceimplicationsformicrocephalysurveillanceinzikaaffectedareas AT ricofatima measurementofheadcircumferenceimplicationsformicrocephalysurveillanceinzikaaffectedareas AT rodriguezheriberto measurementofheadcircumferenceimplicationsformicrocephalysurveillanceinzikaaffectedareas AT zunigaconcepcion measurementofheadcircumferenceimplicationsformicrocephalysurveillanceinzikaaffectedareas AT cigandaalvaro measurementofheadcircumferenceimplicationsformicrocephalysurveillanceinzikaaffectedareas AT stellacandela measurementofheadcircumferenceimplicationsformicrocephalysurveillanceinzikaaffectedareas AT tomassogiselle measurementofheadcircumferenceimplicationsformicrocephalysurveillanceinzikaaffectedareas AT buekenspierre measurementofheadcircumferenceimplicationsformicrocephalysurveillanceinzikaaffectedareas |