Cargando…

Mesoporous Bioactive Glasses Cytocompatibility Assessment: A Review of In Vitro Studies

Thanks to their high porosity and surface area, mesoporous bioactive glasses (MBGs) have gained significant interest in the field of medical applications, in particular, with regards to enhanced bioactive properties which facilitate bone regeneration. The aim of this article is to review the state o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Salètes, Margaux, Vartin, Marta, Mocquot, Caroline, Chevalier, Charlène, Grosgogeat, Brigitte, Colon, Pierre, Attik, Nina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7839003/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33498616
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics6010009
_version_ 1783643310266515456
author Salètes, Margaux
Vartin, Marta
Mocquot, Caroline
Chevalier, Charlène
Grosgogeat, Brigitte
Colon, Pierre
Attik, Nina
author_facet Salètes, Margaux
Vartin, Marta
Mocquot, Caroline
Chevalier, Charlène
Grosgogeat, Brigitte
Colon, Pierre
Attik, Nina
author_sort Salètes, Margaux
collection PubMed
description Thanks to their high porosity and surface area, mesoporous bioactive glasses (MBGs) have gained significant interest in the field of medical applications, in particular, with regards to enhanced bioactive properties which facilitate bone regeneration. The aim of this article is to review the state of the art regarding the biocompatibility evaluation of MBGs and provide a discussion of the various approaches taken. The research was performed using PubMed database and covered articles published in the last five years. From a total of 91 articles, 63 were selected after analyzing them according to our inclusion and exclusion criteria. In vitro methodologies and techniques used for biocompatibility assessment were investigated. Among the biocompatibility assessment techniques, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) has been widely used to study cell morphology and adhesion. Viability and proliferation were assessed using different assays including cell counting and/or cell metabolic activity measurement. Finally, cell differentiation tests relied on the alkaline phosphatase assay; however, these were often complemented by specific bimolecular tests according to the exact application of the mesoporous bioactive glass. The standardization and validation of all tests performed for MBG cytocompatibility is a key aspect and crucial point and should be considered in order to avoid inconsistencies, bias between studies, and unnecessary consumption of time. Therefore, introducing standard tests would serve an important role in the future assessment and development of MBG materials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7839003
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78390032021-01-28 Mesoporous Bioactive Glasses Cytocompatibility Assessment: A Review of In Vitro Studies Salètes, Margaux Vartin, Marta Mocquot, Caroline Chevalier, Charlène Grosgogeat, Brigitte Colon, Pierre Attik, Nina Biomimetics (Basel) Review Thanks to their high porosity and surface area, mesoporous bioactive glasses (MBGs) have gained significant interest in the field of medical applications, in particular, with regards to enhanced bioactive properties which facilitate bone regeneration. The aim of this article is to review the state of the art regarding the biocompatibility evaluation of MBGs and provide a discussion of the various approaches taken. The research was performed using PubMed database and covered articles published in the last five years. From a total of 91 articles, 63 were selected after analyzing them according to our inclusion and exclusion criteria. In vitro methodologies and techniques used for biocompatibility assessment were investigated. Among the biocompatibility assessment techniques, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) has been widely used to study cell morphology and adhesion. Viability and proliferation were assessed using different assays including cell counting and/or cell metabolic activity measurement. Finally, cell differentiation tests relied on the alkaline phosphatase assay; however, these were often complemented by specific bimolecular tests according to the exact application of the mesoporous bioactive glass. The standardization and validation of all tests performed for MBG cytocompatibility is a key aspect and crucial point and should be considered in order to avoid inconsistencies, bias between studies, and unnecessary consumption of time. Therefore, introducing standard tests would serve an important role in the future assessment and development of MBG materials. MDPI 2021-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7839003/ /pubmed/33498616 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics6010009 Text en © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Salètes, Margaux
Vartin, Marta
Mocquot, Caroline
Chevalier, Charlène
Grosgogeat, Brigitte
Colon, Pierre
Attik, Nina
Mesoporous Bioactive Glasses Cytocompatibility Assessment: A Review of In Vitro Studies
title Mesoporous Bioactive Glasses Cytocompatibility Assessment: A Review of In Vitro Studies
title_full Mesoporous Bioactive Glasses Cytocompatibility Assessment: A Review of In Vitro Studies
title_fullStr Mesoporous Bioactive Glasses Cytocompatibility Assessment: A Review of In Vitro Studies
title_full_unstemmed Mesoporous Bioactive Glasses Cytocompatibility Assessment: A Review of In Vitro Studies
title_short Mesoporous Bioactive Glasses Cytocompatibility Assessment: A Review of In Vitro Studies
title_sort mesoporous bioactive glasses cytocompatibility assessment: a review of in vitro studies
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7839003/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33498616
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics6010009
work_keys_str_mv AT saletesmargaux mesoporousbioactiveglassescytocompatibilityassessmentareviewofinvitrostudies
AT vartinmarta mesoporousbioactiveglassescytocompatibilityassessmentareviewofinvitrostudies
AT mocquotcaroline mesoporousbioactiveglassescytocompatibilityassessmentareviewofinvitrostudies
AT chevaliercharlene mesoporousbioactiveglassescytocompatibilityassessmentareviewofinvitrostudies
AT grosgogeatbrigitte mesoporousbioactiveglassescytocompatibilityassessmentareviewofinvitrostudies
AT colonpierre mesoporousbioactiveglassescytocompatibilityassessmentareviewofinvitrostudies
AT attiknina mesoporousbioactiveglassescytocompatibilityassessmentareviewofinvitrostudies